Jump to content

Using AABB to get a entities


UberAffe

Recommended Posts

This is what I am doing currently

int range = myItem.getRange();
BlockPos pPos = player.getPosition();
Vec3d look = player.getLookVec();
BlockPos tPos = pPos.add(new Vec3i(pPos.getX() + look.xCoord*range, pPos.getY()+ (look.yCoord*range), pPos.getZ() + (look.zCoord*range)));
List<Entity> targets = player.worldObj.getEntitiesWithinAABBExcludingEntity(player, new AxisAlignedBB(pPos, tPos));

but it only seems to work when I am facing a certain direction, I think it's north-east.

So two questions:

Any idea why this only seems to work in 1 general direction?

Is there another method or ordering to the entities returned that would allow me to get just the closest entity without doing a bunch of other calculations.

Current Project: Armerger 

Planned mods: Light Drafter  | Ore Swords

Looking for help getting a mod off the ground? Coding  | Textures

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well.

 

Imagine for a moment that your lookvec is (1,0,0)

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It should get me a tPos that is the distance of range away from pPos in the x direction.

 

Yes, and how large of a volume will the AABB between pPos and tPos be?

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're misunderstanding vectors and aabb: the look vector is normalized, so all values are between -1 and 1. If the player is looking straight up or down, x and z coord of look vec are both zero, so:

pPos.getX() + look.xCoord*range

which equals: pPos.getX() + 0 * range
which equals: pPos.getX()

So aabb is between pPos.getX() and... pPos.getX(). A horizontal plane of nothing, basically.

 

That, however, is not the issue. The issue is that you are adding the player's position to itself. Vectors are additive, so (x, y, z).add(x1, y1, z1) becomes (x + x1, y + y1, z + z1).

 

Now imagine you are standing at 1000, 60, -500, looking straight west so your look vector is (-1, 0.5, 0) or something like that. Even with a range of 20, the look vector becomes irrelevant compared to the position. Let's take the xCoord for example:

pPos = 1000

tPos = 1000 + (1000 + (-1 * range)) = 1980, for example

aabb checks for entities between x=1000 and x=1980, which is EAST of your position (very very far east), even though you are looking WEST.

 

Now apply that to all 3 directions; see why you are not getting what you expect?

 

Solution: don't include pPos in the tPos calculations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right. Somehow I managed to ignore the face that I was using the add method to get the new position, which resulted in the players position getting effectively doubled.

 

Second question stands: is there a way to get only the nearest entity that intersects without checking the distance of all of them?

Current Project: Armerger 

Planned mods: Light Drafter  | Ore Swords

Looking for help getting a mod off the ground? Coding  | Textures

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second question stands: is there a way to get only the nearest entity that intersects without checking the distance of all of them?

No, that is literally impossible. You can't know which is the nearest without checking all options, though some methods like #findNearestPlayer and such may make it seem like you don't have to check because you are not making the comparisons in your own code.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

World#doRaycast

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raycasting can detect enemies, sure.  I don't recall offhand which method needs to be called, there's at least two.

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't find any raycast methods in player.worldObj, I found three methods that were variations of rayTraceBlocks with different params. Although #findNearestEntityWithinAABB seems to be doing what I want.

Current Project: Armerger 

Planned mods: Light Drafter  | Ore Swords

Looking for help getting a mod off the ground? Coding  | Textures

Link to comment
Share on other sites

findNearestEntityWithinAABB will work, provided that the volume is actually large enough to contain anything.

 

Anyway, looking up my old artifacts code, the method I used was

rayTraceBlocks_do_do

which did hit entities.

https://github.com/Draco18s/Artifacts/blob/master/main/java/com/draco18s/artifacts/network/PacketHandlerServer.java#L160

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

                                float range = ((float)item.partMap.GetHeight())/16.0f + 1.5f;
			Vec3d pVec = player.getPositionEyes(.5f);
			Vec3d tVec = pVec.add(player.getLookVec().scale(range));
			LogHelper.info("Player is at " + pVec);
			LogHelper.info("Target is at " + tVec);
			RayTraceResult target = player.worldObj.rayTraceBlocks(pVec, tVec,false, true, false);
			LogHelper.info(target.typeOfHit);

This is the call I am using and pVec/tVec have a value for each Coord, but the last line always has a null pointer exception. Even with hard coding the range to 10 it always gives null.

 

Edit: Slight wrong, If I aim at an entity and there is nothing behind it but air I get NULL.

If I aim at an entity and there is a block behind it I get Block . Which seems like it doesn't work for entities anymore.

Current Project: Armerger 

Planned mods: Light Drafter  | Ore Swords

Looking for help getting a mod off the ground? Coding  | Textures

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Electronic Arts is making some much-needed changes to its soccer annual game EAFC 24 Coins. The addition of cross-play between PC, PS5. Stadia as well as Xbox Series X/S gamers and also players from PS4 as well as Xbox One players, is very thrilling. Cross-play has been demanded in FIFA by players for quite a long time. But as exciting as it may be, EA is actually holding off on providing full support for the technology. Particularly, FC 24 is not offering cross-play in its well-known Pro Clubs game mode. A confirmed statement from EA has stated that FC 24's cross-play feature will not be available for Pro Clubs in the foreseeable time. The reason according to EA is to ensure that "product innovativeness is of high top quality." Furthermore, Pro Clubs, according to EA is a degree of technical complexity that is higher than what developers can handle at the moment. "Technical complexity" is a subtle method of describing the scenario. The Pro Clubs of FIFA permit the use of up to 22 players in an online multiplayer game that includes between 2 and 11 real players in each team. Connecting 22 players on one platform isn't a simple task and adding interplay of the four platforms can make difficult. In the real world, the platforms pose less complicated than 22 players, however EA is just exploring cross-play, and therefore it's plausible when they say that additional time is required. It isn't stopping FIFA fans from feeling dissatisfied and angry about the situation However. Demands for cross-play being made available to FC 24 Pro Clubs are being circulated across the web and FIFA YouTuber JCC encouraging players to join support the cause. JCC along with other well-known players within the FIFA community are complaining that EA of placing the importance of FIFA Ultimate Team above the core experience like Pro Clubs. The company is very grateful that it has responded to the growing discontent within members of the FIFA community, saying it is aware of the criticism. Electronic Arts then points to its FIFA Twitter account to receive future updates on its plans for future games. This isn't a guarantee at all but it's about the closest a game's creator can get to say that something is being developed. FC 24 is all but certain to not have cross-play features for Pro Clubs at launch, or during the game's release. Maybe Pro Club cross-play will end being tested in FC 24 similar to how the basic cross-play was implemented in cheap EAFC 24 Coins. More likely, the feature will be a bit further away to be released by EA Sports FC's launch in 2023 or even later. It's also possible that FIFA fans are right and that EA's priority lies in FUT. It's the responsibility of EA to prove the criticism is not true.
    • SENSA69 💯 Daftar Link Slot Gacor Hari Ini Bisa Judi Slot Online KLIK DISINI >>> DAFTAR DAN LOGIN KLIK DISINI >>>   DAFTAR AKUN GACOR KLIK DISINI >>> DAFTAR AKUN VVIP KLIK DISINI >>>  LINK ALTERNATIF KLIK DISINI >>> AKUN GACOR SCATTER HITAM SENSA69 adalah slot gacor winrate 100% dengan server thailand dan akun pro. Dapatkan akses menuju kemenangan ke puluhan sampai ratusan juta rupiah hanya dalam hitungan menit. 3 web yang kami hadirkan ini adalah yang terbaik dengan histori kemenangan tertinggi di satu Asia Tenggara. Member-member dari web ini selalu kembali karena tim admin dan CS yang profesional serta kemenangan berapapun pasti akan dibayar. RTP slot gacor juga sudah disiapkan agar kalian tidak bingung lagi mau main apa dan di jam berapa. Semua fasilitas seperti deposit dana dan pulsa sudah disiapkan juga untuk kemudahan para slotters. Jadi tunggu apalagi? Raih kemenangan kalian disini sekarang juga!
    • SV388: Temukan situs taruhan sabung ayam resmi yang terjamin aman di Winning303! Bergabunglah dengan SV388 untuk pengalaman taruhan sabung ayam yang mengasyikkan dan aman. Nikmati berbagai pertandingan sabung ayam terbaik sambil memanfaatkan layanan terpercaya dari Winning303. Daftar sekarang dan rasakan sensasi taruhan yang tak terlupakan dengan SV388 di Winning303! ❱❱❱❱❱ DAFTAR DI SINI ❰❰❰❰❰ ❱❱❱❱❱ DAFTAR DI SINI ❰❰❰❰❰
    • MPO1121: Temukan daftar situs judi slot dengan layanan pembayaran melalui Bank Danamon. Bergabunglah dengan MPO1121 untuk pengalaman taruhan slot online yang menarik dan aman. Nikmati berbagai permainan slot terbaik sambil memanfaatkan kemudahan pembayaran melalui Bank Danamon. Daftar sekarang dan rasakan sensasi taruhan yang tak terlupakan dengan MPO1121!" ❱❱❱❱❱ DAFTAR DI SINI ❰❰❰❰❰ ❱❱❱❱❱ DAFTAR DI SINI ❰❰❰❰❰
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.