Jump to content

Ore dictionary custom furnace recipes?


Koopamillion

Recommended Posts

So, I have a block called an electric pounder, it has custom recipes. Anyway, I want it to grind up any "copper ore" that has an ore dictionary name of oreCopper. How would I come about approaching this. This is my custom recipe class:

 

https://gist.github.com/anonymous/0033a376ed1baaaa59dc7fe5c3236820

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You will need a way to add a recipe taking in a string argument, instead of an item stack, and getting all of the item stacks from the OreDict that are registered with that string.

 

OreDictionary.getOres(...)

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) You get a

List<ItemStack>

returned, not an

ItemStack[]

.

2) Go through every

ItemStack

in that

List

and check if the input is in that list.

Don't PM me with questions. They will be ignored! Make a thread on the appropriate board for support.

 

1.12 -> 1.13 primer by williewillus.

 

1.7.10 and older versions of Minecraft are no longer supported due to it's age! Update to the latest version for support.

 

http://www.howoldisminecraft1710.today/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I'd actually do is in the

addRecipe(string input, ItemStack output)

method is get the OreDict stacks there and call

addRecipe(ItemStack input, ItemStack output)

so you're not looking up the OreDict every time the ingredient is checked.

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I'd actually do is in the

addRecipe(string input, ItemStack output)

method is get the OreDict stacks there and call

addRecipe(ItemStack input, ItemStack output)

so you're not looking up the OreDict every time the ingredient is checked.

 

Forge's ore recipes all store the

List<ItemStack>

for the given ore name as returned by

OreDictionary.getOres

, this list will be updated by the Ore Dictionary if any additional items are registered for this name.

 

Ore Dictionary entries are often registered in the same phase as recipes are added (init), so it's entirely possible that more items will be registered for a name after you add a recipe using it.

Please don't PM me to ask for help. Asking your question in a public thread preserves it for people who are having the same problem in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ore Dictionary entries are often registered in the same phase as recipes are added (init), so it's entirely possible that more items will be registered for a name after you add a recipe using it.

 

I never do my recipes in init, I always do them in postInit for precisely this reason.  That and IMC messages.

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.