Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

[Solved] [1.9.4] Force block update at position


onVoid
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am using the code

        			worldIn.destroyBlock(pos.add(0, 0, i), false);

(i being a variable) to destroy multiple blocks at once. The blocks are being removed but aren't updating, still showing as what they were before until I relog. How can I force a block update at the location?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am using the code

        			worldIn.destroyBlock(pos.add(0, 0, i), false);

(i being a variable) to destroy multiple blocks at once. The blocks are being removed but aren't updating, still showing as what they were before until I relog. How can I force a block update at the location?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you calling this ONLY (!world.isRemote) server side?

Yes, here is my whole code for the action.

    public EnumActionResult onItemUse(ItemStack stack, EntityPlayer playerIn, World worldIn, BlockPos pos, EnumHand hand, EnumFacing facing, float hitX, float hitY, float hitZ)
    {
        if (!worldIn.isRemote) {
        	for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++){
        			if (worldIn.getBlockState(pos.add(0, 0, i)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.STONE) && playerIn.canPlayerEdit(pos.add(0, 0, i), facing, stack)){
        			worldIn.destroyBlock(pos.add(0, 0, i), false);
            			//worldIn.getBlockState(pos.add(0,0,i)).getBlock().removedByPlayer(worldIn.getBlockState(pos.add(0,0,i)),
            					//worldIn, pos.add(0,0,i), playerIn, true);
        			worldIn.scheduleBlockUpdate(pos, worldIn.getBlockState(pos.add(0,0,i)).getBlock(), 1, 100);
        			}
        	}
        }

The first block is the only one that actually gets updated and is shown breaking. The second one does not update.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you calling this ONLY (!world.isRemote) server side?

Yes, here is my whole code for the action.

    public EnumActionResult onItemUse(ItemStack stack, EntityPlayer playerIn, World worldIn, BlockPos pos, EnumHand hand, EnumFacing facing, float hitX, float hitY, float hitZ)
    {
        if (!worldIn.isRemote) {
        	for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++){
        			if (worldIn.getBlockState(pos.add(0, 0, i)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.STONE) && playerIn.canPlayerEdit(pos.add(0, 0, i), facing, stack)){
        			worldIn.destroyBlock(pos.add(0, 0, i), false);
            			//worldIn.getBlockState(pos.add(0,0,i)).getBlock().removedByPlayer(worldIn.getBlockState(pos.add(0,0,i)),
            					//worldIn, pos.add(0,0,i), playerIn, true);
        			worldIn.scheduleBlockUpdate(pos, worldIn.getBlockState(pos.add(0,0,i)).getBlock(), 1, 100);
        			}
        	}
        }

The first block is the only one that actually gets updated and is shown breaking. The second one does not update.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just tried it, works just fine with just

destroyBlock

:

 

Mine's done on right click, if that changes anything.

   
public EnumActionResult onItemUse(ItemStack stack, EntityPlayer playerIn, World worldIn, BlockPos pos, EnumHand hand, EnumFacing facing, float hitX, float hitY, float hitZ)
    {
        if (!worldIn.isRemote) {
        	int dir = MathHelper.floor_double((double)((playerIn.rotationYaw * 4F) / 360F) + 0.5D) & 3;
    		if (dir == 0){
        	for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++){
        			if (worldIn.getBlockState(pos.add(0, 0, i)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.STONE)){
        			worldIn.destroyBlock(pos.add(0, 0, i), false);
        			}
        			if (worldIn.getBlockState(pos.add(1, 0, i)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.STONE)){
        			worldIn.destroyBlock(pos.add(1, 0, i), false);
        			}        			if (worldIn.getBlockState(pos.add(-1, 0, i)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.STONE)){
        			worldIn.destroyBlock(pos.add(-1, 0, i), false);

        			}
        		}
    		}
        }
	return null;
    }

Full code

EDIT: Longer gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • no, the way he use it's the way to go
    • Minecraft 1.16 requires java 8-15, you currently using java 16, downgrade your java to 8-15 and the problem should be fixed.
    • Hi So Im trying to set up a Server for 1.16.4 now but when I go to launch it doesn't work, Im using the Life in the Village 2 server pack thats already pre-made but it still wont launch no matter what I try. If I can get some help that would be great thanks. D:\Modded Mc\LITV2-Serverpack-1.28a\LITV2-Serverpack-1.28a>java -Xmx4G -jar forge-1.16.5-36.2.4.jar nogui 2021-11-29 13:43:08,050 main WARN Advanced terminal features are not available in this environment [13:43:08] [main/INFO] [cp.mo.mo.Launcher/MODLAUNCHER]: ModLauncher running: args [--gameDir, ., --launchTarget, fmlserver, --fml.forgeVersion, 36.2.4, --fml.mcpVersion, 20210115.111550, --fml.mcVersion, 1.16.5, --fml.forgeGroup, net.minecraftforge, nogui] [13:43:08] [main/INFO] [cp.mo.mo.Launcher/MODLAUNCHER]: ModLauncher 8.0.9+86+master.3cf110c starting: java version 16.0.2 by Oracle Corporation Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalAccessError: class cpw.mods.modlauncher.SecureJarHandler (in unnamed module @0x4de5031f) cannot access class sun.security.util.ManifestEntryVerifier (in module java.base) because module java.base does not export sun.security.util to unnamed module @0x4de5031f at cpw.mods.modlauncher.SecureJarHandler.lambda$static$1(SecureJarHandler.java:41) at cpw.mods.modlauncher.api.LamdbaExceptionUtils.uncheck(LamdbaExceptionUtils.java:95) at cpw.mods.modlauncher.SecureJarHandler.<clinit>(SecureJarHandler.java:41) at cpw.mods.modlauncher.Launcher.lambda$new$6(Launcher.java:55) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.computeIfAbsent(ConcurrentHashMap.java:1708) at cpw.mods.modlauncher.api.TypesafeMap.computeIfAbsent(TypesafeMap.java:52) at cpw.mods.modlauncher.api.TypesafeMap.computeIfAbsent(TypesafeMap.java:47) at cpw.mods.modlauncher.Environment.computePropertyIfAbsent(Environment.java:62) at cpw.mods.modlauncher.Launcher.<init>(Launcher.java:55) at cpw.mods.modlauncher.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:66) at net.minecraftforge.server.ServerMain$Runner.runLauncher(ServerMain.java:63) at net.minecraftforge.server.ServerMain$Runner.access$100(ServerMain.java:60) at net.minecraftforge.server.ServerMain.main(ServerMain.java:57) D:\Modded Mc\LITV2-Serverpack-1.28a\LITV2-Serverpack-1.28a>pause Press any key to continue . . .  
    • Still waiting on the issue.
    • Registering in static fields isn't ideal. You have a method that registers your deferred register to the event bus, right? leave your RegistryObject fields as non-final and empty, and set their reference in that method, right after registering the deferred register on the bus.
  • Topics

  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.