Jump to content

[1.16.4] Custom item enchantability


AzizD

Recommended Posts

There are functions that define this. The default checks what kind of item things are and allows or denies various enchantments.

TieredItem only allows Unbreaking (because that's the default).

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Override
    public boolean canApplyAtEnchantingTable(ItemStack stack, Enchantment enchantment) {
        enchantment = Enchantments.SHARPNESS;
        return enchantment.canApply(stack.getItem().getDefaultInstance());
    }

I tried to override this method. Whenever i put the item in the enchantment table game crashes with java.lang.StackOverflowError.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, AzizD said:

@Override
    public boolean canApplyAtEnchantingTable(ItemStack stack, Enchantment enchantment) {
        if(enchantment == Enchantments.SHARPNESS) {
            enchantment.canApply(stack);
        }
        return true;
    }

I changed with this but same error.

well obviously, Enchantment#canApply(), calls ItemStack#CanApplyAtEnchantingTable(), which calls Item#canApplyAtEnchantingTable. Therefore, you got yourself an infinite loop...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

    @Override
    public boolean canApplyAtEnchantingTable(ItemStack stack, Enchantment enchantment) {
        Enchantment[] enchantments = {
                Enchantments.SHARPNESS,
                Enchantments.LOOTING,
                Enchantments.FIRE_ASPECT,
                Enchantments.UNBREAKING,
                Enchantments.KNOCKBACK,
                Enchantments.MENDING,
        };
        for(int i=0;i<enchantments.length;i++){
            if(enchantments[i] == enchantment){
                return true;
            }
        }
        return false;
    }

 

I wrote this and it worked. Thx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, diesieben07 said:

A better way would be to use a Set (probably ImmutableSet in this case).

It looks way better. Thanks for the advice.

@Override
    public boolean canApplyAtEnchantingTable(ItemStack stack, Enchantment enchantment) {
        Set e = ImmutableSet.of(
                Enchantments.SHARPNESS,
                Enchantments.LOOTING,
                Enchantments.FIRE_ASPECT,
                Enchantments.UNBREAKING,
                Enchantments.KNOCKBACK
                );
        return e.contains(enchantment);
    }

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.