Jump to content

LargePrime

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Converted

  • Gender
    Undisclosed
  • Personal Text
    I am new!

LargePrime's Achievements

Tree Puncher

Tree Puncher (2/8)

0

Reputation

  1. So does this mean luacs1998 side project has been halted? Does Forge have any plans to help modders do better? Or help Server Owners identify High performance enabled mods that wont choke servers? Or low performance ones? So we dont ALL have to test the same thing over and over again? So MCPC+ must really be working their buts off. That's one approach I guess. Am I free to 'care' and entertain other approaches? I know My MCPC+ servers are faster and lighter than straight vanilla-forge. I was hoping for even more from a version that dropped bukkit entirely. If that is not going to happen, then I guess I will stick with MCPC+?
  2. So does this mean luacs1998 side project has been halted? Does Forge have any plans to help modders do better? Or help Server Owners identify High performance enabled mods that wont choke servers? Or low performance ones? So we dont ALL have to test the same thing over and over again? So MCPC+ must really be working their buts off. That's one approach I guess. Am I free to 'care' and entertain other approaches? I know My MCPC+ servers are faster and lighter than straight vanilla-forge. I was hoping for even more from a version that dropped bukkit entirely. If that is not going to happen, then I guess I will stick with MCPC+?
  3. Are you saying that vanilla server is plenty optimal? Is Forge looking at helping modders move to threadable mod architectures? Or ways of writing mods to support higher performance? Currently Spigot supports ore obfuscation with performance that no mod can match. Will luacs1998 side project do that, or are you saying Forge will have to ore obfuscate thru mods, if we dont use spigot? luacs1998; with Forge Essentials relatively mature, we can almost drop bukkit now, right?
  4. Are you saying that vanilla server is plenty optimal? Is Forge looking at helping modders move to threadable mod architectures? Or ways of writing mods to support higher performance? Currently Spigot supports ore obfuscation with performance that no mod can match. Will luacs1998 side project do that, or are you saying Forge will have to ore obfuscate thru mods, if we dont use spigot? luacs1998; with Forge Essentials relatively mature, we can almost drop bukkit now, right?
  5. I am curious if there is any plan to have a Vanilla/Forge version of Spigot? Without the CraftBukkit/Bukkit support. Yes MCPC+ exists. But with the current and future capability of forge, I am looking at a bukkit free future. But My servers need the efficiency that spigot brings to the table. It wold be kinda silly If i have to keep bukkit compatibility just for the efficiency. I could find and have not read anything about this. I cant be the only one?
  6. I am curious if there is any plan to have a Vanilla/Forge version of Spigot? Without the CraftBukkit/Bukkit support. Yes MCPC+ exists. But with the current and future capability of forge, I am looking at a bukkit free future. But My servers need the efficiency that spigot brings to the table. It wold be kinda silly If i have to keep bukkit compatibility just for the efficiency. I could find and have not read anything about this. I cant be the only one?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.