Jump to content

Changing one item into another (not metadata)


LittleBreadLoaf

Recommended Posts

Hello, this is LittleBreadLoaf. I'll get right into it.

In my mod, the player is given a type and texture for their sword that is unique to the player. After they unlock it, they can "upgrade" their sword for short periods of time as long as they have energy. For activating the second-tier sword, a simple method is used:

/**
     * called when the player releases the use item button. Args: itemstack, world, entityplayer, itemInUseCount
     */
    public void onPlayerStoppedUsing(ItemStack par1ItemStack, World par2World, EntityPlayer par3EntityPlayer, int par4)
    {
if(props.getZType() == 1)
	        		{
                		ItemStack shikai = new ItemStack(Items.shikaifire, 1);
                		par1ItemStack.itemID = shikai.itemID;
}
}

This part works just fine. To answer your question that I know you have, why not just use metadata, this is why: Depending on the player's type, they can get 12 different types of tier 2 swords, each with 5 textures available. I have the first sword go to different tier 2 swords, and from there to whatever texture they have, instead of one item with 60 different subtypes (or even 12, if I did textures differently)

 

However, to deactivate the tier 2 sword, I used a keybind and relatively the same code:

    @Override
         public void keyDown(EnumSet<TickType> types, KeyBinding kb, boolean tickEnd, boolean isRepeat)
         {
                this.keyPressed = true;
               EntityPlayer player = mc.thePlayer;
       		ItemStack heldItem = player.getCurrentEquippedItem();
    		ItemStack var13 = new ItemStack(Items.zanpakuto, 1);
               if(heldItem != null )
               {
            	   if(heldItem.getItem() == Items.shikaifire)
            	   {
            		   heldItem.itemID = var13.itemID;
            	   }
}
}

 

All well and good, but on servers it will sometimes revert the texture to the original tier 1 sword (zanpakuto), but keep the effects and damage of the tier two sword, and it still drains the player's energy.

 

So my questions are these:

1) Is there a better way of changing one item into another than switching item IDs?

2) If not, and my methods are ridiculous and terrible coding, do I need to make a bunch of different metadatas for this item?

3) It is registering the change of ID clientside, AKA changing the texture, but serverside keeps the tier 2 sword when deactivated. Is there a way I can keep my method but use packets to alert the server of the change? 

 

If you want the rest of the item classes, just ask. I figure that's all that's needed to answer the question, but the rest is available.

Thanks for any help that may or may not come,

LittleBreadLoaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple things:

 

1. You don't need to create a whole new ItemStack just to switch the ID on the original. Just go with "par1ItemStack.itemID = Items.shikaifire.itemID;", it will make your code a bit more concise.

2. You probably shouldn't use a direct comparison between the ItemStack's Item object and your singleton sword Item. In theory it should work, but there are all sorts of little reasons a straight-up comparison like that might not behave as expected. Try pulling the item ID straight off the held ItemStack and compare that against the sword's item ID instead. Comparing IDs is always a better idea than comparing the Item itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple things:

 

1. You don't need to create a whole new ItemStack just to switch the ID on the original. Just go with "par1ItemStack.itemID = Items.shikaifire.itemID;", it will make your code a bit more concise.

2. You probably shouldn't use a direct comparison between the ItemStack's Item object and your singleton sword Item. In theory it should work, but there are all sorts of little reasons a straight-up comparison like that might not behave as expected. Try pulling the item ID straight off the held ItemStack and compare that against the sword's item ID instead. Comparing IDs is always a better idea than comparing the Item itself.

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind.  :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In your key handler:

//perform item checks...
Packet packet = new CustomPacket(data);//build a packet with data, like a boolean to switch between tiers and the player entityid to identify him
player.sendQueue.addToSendQueue(packet);//send packet to the server

In your packet handler:

//handle the packet, read data, use it to check and perform changes...
if(player instanceof EntityPlayerMP)//avoid endless loop
		{
			((EntityPlayerMP)player).playerNetServerHandler.sendPacketToPlayer(packet);//send packet to the player client
		}

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright... Sorry I'm so hopeless, but what do I put in the CustomPacket's methods? Like readPacketData and such? In the key handler, I have

Packet packet = new DeactivatePacket(true, player.username);

but I don't know how to make it read this, or understand what I want it to do

Also, player doesn't have the method sendQueue. Is there a way to get player differently than (EntityPlayer) player = Minecraft.getMinecraft().thePlayer;?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • rp.crazyheal.xyz mods  
    • I'm developing a dimension, but it's kinda resource intensive so some times during player teleporting it lags behind making the player phase down into the void, so im trying to implement some kind of pregeneration to force the game loading a small set of chunks in the are the player will teleport to. Some of the things i've tried like using ServerLevel and ServerChunkCache methods like getChunk() dont actually trigger chunk generation if the chunk isn't already on persistent storage (already generated) or placing tickets, but that doesn't work either. Ideally i should be able to check when the task has ended too. I've peeked around some pregen engines, but they're too complex for my current understanding of the system of which I have just a basic understanding (how ServerLevel ,ServerChunkCache  and ChunkMap work) of. Any tips or other classes I should be looking into to understand how to do this correctly?
    • https://mclo.gs/4UC49Ao
    • Way back in the Forge 1.17 days, work started for adding JPMS (Java Platform Module Support) to ModLauncher and ForgeModLoader. This has been used internally by Forge and some libraries for a while now, but mods (those with mods.toml specifically) have not been able to take advantage of it. As of Forge 1.21.1 and 1.21.3, this is now possible!   What is JPMS and what does it mean for modders? JPMS is the Java Platform Module System, introduced in Java 9. It allows you to define modules, which are collections of packages and resources that can be exported or hidden from other modules. This allows for much more fine-tuned control over visibility, cleaner syntax for service declarations and support for sealed types across packages. For example, you might have a mod with a module called `com.example.mod` that exports `com.example.mod.api` and `com.example.mod.impl` to other mods, but hides `com.example.mod.internal` from them. This would allow you to have a clean API for other mods to use, while keeping your internal implementation details hidden from IDE hints, helping prevent accidental usage of internals that might break without prior notice. This is particularly useful if you'd like to use public records with module-private constructors or partially module-private record components, as you can create a sealed interface that only your record implements, having the interface be exported and the record hidden. It's also nice for declaring and using services, as you'll get compile-time errors from the Java compiler for typos and the like, rather than deferring to runtime errors. In more advanced cases, you can also have public methods that are only accessible to specific other modules -- handy if you want internal interactions between multiple of your own mods.   How do I bypass it? We understand there may be drama in implementing a system that prevents mods from accessing each other's internals when necessary (like when a mod is abandoned or you need to fix a compat issue) -- after all, we are already modding a game that doesn't have explicit support for Java mods yet. We have already thought of this and are offering APIs from day one to selectively bypass module restrictions. Let me be clear: Forge mods are not required to use JPMS. If you don't want to use it, you don't have to. The default behaviour is to have fully open, fully exported automatic modules. In Java, you can use the `Add-Opens` and `Add-Exports` manifest attributes to selectively bypass module restrictions of other mods at launch time, and we've added explicit support for these when loading your Forge mods. At compile-time, you can use existing solutions such as the extra-java-module-info Gradle plugin to deal with non-modular dependencies and add extra opens and exports to other modules. Here's an example on how to make the internal package `com.example.examplemod.internal` open to your mod in your build.gradle: tasks.named('jar', Jar) { manifest { attributes([ 'Add-Opens' : 'com.example.examplemod/com.example.examplemod.internal' 'Specification-Title' : mod_id, 'Specification-Vendor' : mod_authors // (...) ]) } } With the above in your mod's jar manifest, you can now reflectively access the classes inside that internal package. Multiple entries are separated with a space, as per Java's official spec. You can also use Add-Exports to directly call without reflection, however you'd need to use the Gradle plugin mentioned earlier to be able to compile. The syntax for Add-Exports is the same as Add-Opens, and instructions for the compile-time step with the Gradle plugin are detailed later in this post. Remember to prefer the opens and exports keywords inside module-info.java for sources you control. The Add-Opens/Add-Exports attributes are only intended for forcing open other mods.   What else is new with module support? Previously, the runtime module name was always forced to the first mod ID in your `mods.toml` file and all packages were forced fully open and exported. Module names are now distinguished from mod IDs, meaning the module name in your module-info.java can be different from the mod ID in your `mods.toml`. This allows you to have a more descriptive module name that doesn't have to be the same as your mod ID, however we strongly recommend including your mod ID as part of your module name to aid troubleshooting. The `Automatic-Module-Name` manifest attribute is now also honoured, allowing you to specify a module name for your mod without needing to create a `module-info.java` file. This is particularly useful for mods that don't care about JPMS features but want to have a more descriptive module name and easier integration with other mods that do use JPMS.   How do I use it? The first step is to create a `module-info.java` file in your mod's source directory. This file should be in the same package as your main mod class, and should look something like this: open module com.example.examplemod { requires net.minecraftforge.eventbus; requires net.minecraftforge.fmlcore; requires net.minecraftforge.forge; requires net.minecraftforge.javafmlmod; requires net.minecraftforge.mergetool.api; requires org.slf4j; requires logging; } For now, we're leaving the whole module open to reflection, which is a good starting point. When we know we want to close something off, we can remove the open modifier from the module and open or export individual packages instead. Remember that you need to be open to Forge (module name net.minecraftforge.forge), otherwise it can't call your mod's constructor. Next is fixing modules in Gradle. While Forge and Java support modules properly, Gradle does not put automatic modules on the module path by default, meaning that the logging module (from com.mojang:logging) is not found. To fix this, add the Gradle plugin and add a compile-time module definition for that Mojang library: plugins { // (...) id 'org.gradlex.extra-java-module-info' version "1.9" } // (...) extraJavaModuleInfo { failOnMissingModuleInfo = false automaticModule("com.mojang:logging", "logging") } The automatic module override specified in your build.gradle should match the runtime one to avoid errors. You can do the same for any library or mod dependency that is missing either a module-info or explicit Automatic-Module-Name, however be aware that you may need to update your mod once said library adds one. That's all you need to get started with module support in your mods. You can learn more about modules and how to use them at dev.java.
    • Faire la mise à jour grâce à ce lien m'a aider personnellement, merci à @Paint_Ninja. https://www.amd.com/en/support 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.