Jump to content

[1.8] [SOLVED] Problems with an item with an inventory after porting to 1.8


SnowyEgret

Recommended Posts

Hi :)

 

A while back I posted for help with setting up an item with an inventory. I got everything working after much help from diesieben07 (many thanks again). Here is the thread:

 

http://www.minecraftforge.net/forum/index.php/topic,22360.msg114869.html#msg114869

 

After porting to 1.8, things are not working any more. When I reopen the gui, all items placed in the inventory have disappeared. Here are my relevent classes (I am putting spells on a staff, both of which are items):

 

InventoryStaff (setInventorySlotContents() passes the call on to the inventory passed to the constructor. I am writing immediately to the NBTTag)

public class InventoryStaff implements IInventory {

private TagStaff tag;

//These three fields to be used in method setInventorySlotContents
private IInventory parentInventory;
private ItemStack parentStack;
private int parentSlot;

public InventoryStaff(IInventory parentInventory, int parentSlot) {
	this.parentInventory = parentInventory;
	this.parentSlot = parentSlot;
	parentStack = parentInventory.getStackInSlot(parentSlot);
	tag = new TagStaff(parentStack);
}

//IInventory--------------------------------------------------------

@Override
public ItemStack getStackInSlot(int i) {
	return tag.getItemStack(i);
}

@Override
public ItemStack decrStackSize(int i, int amount) {
	ItemStack stack = tag.getItemStack(i);
	tag.setItemStack(i, null);
	return stack;
}

@Override
public ItemStack getStackInSlotOnClosing(int i) {
	//Seems like this is not being called
	System.out.println();
	if (tag.getItemStack(i) != null) {
		ItemStack itemstack = tag.getItemStack(i);
		//Why this?
		tag.setItemStack(i, null);
		return itemstack;
	} else {
		return null;
	}
}

@Override
public void setInventorySlotContents(int i, ItemStack stack) {
	tag.setItemStack(i, stack);
	//These three fields were passed to constructor
	parentInventory.setInventorySlotContents(parentSlot, this.parentStack);
}

@Override
public int getSizeInventory() {
	return Staff.maxNumSpells;
}

@Override
public int getInventoryStackLimit() {
	return 1;
}

@Override
public void markDirty() {
}

@Override
public boolean isUseableByPlayer(EntityPlayer player) {
	return true;
}

@Override
public boolean isItemValidForSlot(int i, ItemStack stack) {
	return true;
}

// ---------------------------------- New 1.8 methods in IInventory

@Override
public String getName() {
	return null;
}

@Override
public boolean hasCustomName() {
	return false;
}

@Override
public IChatComponent getDisplayName() {
	return new ChatComponentText(getName());
}

@Override
public void openInventory(EntityPlayer player) {
	System.out.println();
}

@Override
public void closeInventory(EntityPlayer player) {
}

@Override
public int getField(int id) {
	// TODO Auto-generated method stub
	return 0;
}

@Override
public void setField(int id, int value) {
	// TODO Auto-generated method stub

}

@Override
public int getFieldCount() {
	// TODO Auto-generated method stub
	return 0;
}

@Override
public void clear() {
	//Seems this is not being called
	System.out.println();
	for (int i = 0; i < parentInventory.getSizeInventory(); ++i) {
		setInventorySlotContents(i, null);
	}
}
}

 

TagStaff encapsulates all the complexitity of writing to the tag and it working fine, so I won't post it.

 

GuiStaffContainer:

public class GuiStaffContainer extends Container {

private IInventory inventoryStaff;

public GuiStaffContainer(InventoryPlayer inventoryPlayer, IInventory inventoryStaff) {
	this.inventoryStaff = inventoryStaff;

	for (int i = 0; i < inventoryStaff.getSizeInventory(); i++) {
		//Overrides isItemValid to permit only spells in these slots
		addSlotToContainer(new GuiStaffSlot(inventoryStaff, i, 8 + i * 18, 18));
	}

	for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
		for (int j = 0; j < 9; j++) {
			addSlotToContainer(new Slot(inventoryPlayer, j + i * 9 + 9, 8 + j * 18, 49 + i * 18));
		}
	}

	for (int i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
		addSlotToContainer(new Slot(inventoryPlayer, i, 8 + i * 18, 107));
	}
}

@Override
public boolean canInteractWith(EntityPlayer player) {
	return  inventoryStaff.isUseableByPlayer(player);
}
}

 

GuiHandler

public class GuiHandler implements IGuiHandler {

@Override
public Object getServerGuiElement(int id, EntityPlayer player, World w, int x, int y, int z) {
	switch (id) {
	case 3:
		return new GuiStaffContainer(player.inventory, new InventoryStaff(player.inventory,
				player.inventory.currentItem));
	default:
		throw new IllegalArgumentException("GUI id " + id + " is undefined");
	}
}

@Override
public Object getClientGuiElement(int id, EntityPlayer player, World world, int x, int y, int z) {
	switch (id) {
	case 3:
		return new GuiStaff(new GuiStaffContainer(player.inventory, new InventoryStaff(player.inventory,
				player.inventory.currentItem)));
	default:
		throw new IllegalArgumentException("GUI id " + id + " is undefined");
	}
}
}

 

The tag seems to be in sync on both side after placing a spell on the staff:

[16:22:18] [Client thread/INFO] [sTDOUT]: [ds.plato.item.staff.TagStaff:setItemStack:65]: tag={index:0,0:"SpellBox",}
[16:22:18] [server thread/INFO] [sTDOUT]: [ds.plato.item.staff.TagStaff:setItemStack:65]: tag={index:0,0:"SpellBox",}

 

When I close and reopen the gui, the staff has no spells and the tag on the server side is empty:

[16:24:30] [Client thread/INFO] [sTDOUT]: [ds.plato.item.staff.Staff:onItemUse:49]: tag={index:0,0:"SpellBox",}
[16:24:30] [server thread/INFO] [sTDOUT]: [ds.plato.item.staff.Staff:onItemUse:49]: tag={index:0,}

 

I am opening the gui in Staff.onItemUse:

	@Override
public boolean onItemUse(ItemStack stack, EntityPlayer player, World world, BlockPos pos, EnumFacing side, float sx, float sy, float sz) {

	// To compare item stacks on both sides
	System.out.println("tag=" + stack.getTagCompound());

	if (world.isRemote) {
		return true;
	}

	// Open staff gui if space is down
	if (Keyboard.isKeyDown(Keyboard.KEY_SPACE)) {
		player.openGui(Plato.instance, 3, world, 0, 0, 0);
		return true;
	}
}

 

Logic tells me I am doing something elsewhere on the server side which is clearing the tag, but I can't find it. Any help appreciated :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks coolAlias for the reply :)

 

I had a look at your tutorial, specifically class ItemStore. I think my code is the equivalent of yours. I am returning when the world is remote and opening the gui on the server thread. Here is my Staff.onItemUse() cleaned up a little and commented. I have also overriden getMaxItemUseDuration as you suggest:

 

	@Override
public int getMaxItemUseDuration(ItemStack stack) {
	return 1; // return any value greater than zero
}

@Override
public boolean onItemUse(ItemStack stack, EntityPlayer player, World world, BlockPos pos, EnumFacing side, float sx, float sy, float sz) {

	// To compare item stacks and their tags on both sides
	System.out.println("tag=" + stack.getTagCompound());

	// Return if called from the client thread. We only want the the call from the server side.
	if (world.isRemote) {
		return true;
	}

	// We are on the server side. Open staff gui if space bar is down
	if (Keyboard.isKeyDown(Keyboard.KEY_SPACE)) {
		player.openGui(Plato.instance, GuiHandler.GUI_STAFF, world, (int) player.posX, (int) player.posY,
				(int) player.posZ);
		return true;
	}

	// Get the current spell on the staff and use it
	if (!isEmpty(stack)) {
		Spell s = getSpell(stack);
		s.onItemUse(stack, player, world, pos, side, sx, sy, sz);
		return true;
	}

	return false;
}

 

I am overriding onItemUse() instead of onItemRightClick(), but my guess is that it shouldn't make a difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There absolutely is a difference: onItemUse is only called when the player clicks on a block, not in the air; onItemRightClick is called for both.

 

You CAN NOT open the gui on the server from a key press. Read my last reply, read the tutorial. Besides, why are you bothering with a key press when the player is already right-clicking with the item? Just open the gui onItemRightClick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In your tutorial the opening of your gui on the server is effectively modified by a keypress:

 

@Override
public ItemStack onItemRightClick(ItemStack stack, World world, EntityPlayer player) {
if (!world.isRemote) {
if (!player.isSneaking()) {
player.openGui(TutorialMain.instance, TutorialMain.GUI_ITEM_INV, player.worldObj, (int) player.posX, (int) player.posY, (int) player.posZ);

 

I understand now that player.isSneaking() is not the same as testing for a keypress. Thankyou for pointing that out. I have changed to isSneaking now.

 

I am bothering with the keypress because with no modifier the call is passed on to the current spell on the staff. I need onItemUse because I want the side parameter for use in the spell.

 

Anyway, non of this solves my original problem. When I move new spells from the player's inventory to the staff and reopen the gui, the spells are no longer there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, the Minecraft Forum editor seems to have garbled most of the tutorial. Here is the original, and the following is the most important part, updated for 1.8:

/**
 * For inventories stored in ItemStacks, it is critical to implement this method
 * in order to write the inventory to the ItemStack's NBT whenever it changes.
 */
@Override
public void markDirty() {
	for (int i = 0; i < getSizeInventory(); ++i) {
		if (getStackInSlot(i) != null && getStackInSlot(i).stackSize == 0)
			inventory[i] = null;
	}
	writeToNBT(invStack.getTagCompound());
}

In your inventory class, you did not put anything at all in markDirty(), which is why your inventory is not saving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pointed this out on my first post, maybe not clearly enough: I do not have a field of type ItemStack[] in my inventory which needs to be written to the tag after every change to the stack array. Instead, I am writing directly to the stack's tag on every call to setInventorySlotContents and decrStackSize. To illustrate the point I have added a println to my previously empty markDirty which prints the current state of the tag to the console:

 

[10:46:00] [Client thread/INFO] [sTDOUT]: [ds.plato.item.staff.InventoryStaff:markDirty:64]: tag=TagStaff [tag={index:0,0:"SpellBox",}]
[10:46:00] [Client thread/INFO] [sTDOUT]: [ds.plato.item.staff.InventoryStaff:markDirty:64]: tag=TagStaff [tag={index:0,0:"SpellBox",}]
[10:46:00] [server thread/INFO] [sTDOUT]: [ds.plato.item.staff.InventoryStaff:markDirty:64]: tag=TagStaff [tag={index:0,0:"SpellBox",}]
[10:46:00] [server thread/INFO] [sTDOUT]: [ds.plato.item.staff.InventoryStaff:markDirty:64]: tag=TagStaff [tag={index:0,0:"SpellBox",}]

Not sure why I am getting two calls from each thread, but you can see that, after adding a box spell to the staff,  the tags on both server and client side are up to date.

 

When I close and reopen the gui I get this in the console from the println in Staff.onItemUse:

 

[10:59:27] [Client thread/INFO] [sTDOUT]: [ds.plato.item.staff.Staff:onItemUse:55]: tag={index:0,0:"SpellBox",}
[10:59:27] [server thread/INFO] [sTDOUT]: [ds.plato.item.staff.Staff:onItemUse:55]: tag={index:0,}

 

Clearly, somewhere along the line, the server side tag has lost the box spell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, I see. Well, that should work if you're already writing to the containing ItemStack's tag compound. At this point, I suggest comparing your code to mine method by method and seeing what is different.

 

Sorry I can't point out specifically what is wrong, but my guess is it has something to do with your TagStaff object.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solved my problem. Added one line to InventoryStaff.setInventoryContents to set the tag on the parent stack:

 

	@Override
public void setInventorySlotContents(int slot, ItemStack stack) {
	tag.setStack(slot, stack);
	//Fix for issue #42: Staff loses spells when reopening gui
	parentStack.setTagCompound(tagStaff.getTag());
	parentInventory.setInventorySlotContents(parentSlot, parentStack);
}

 

parentInventory is the inventory containing this inventory

parentSlot the slot this inventory is in.

parentStack is that slot's stack

 

Thanks for the help CoolAlias!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • https://mclo.gs/4UC49Ao
    • Way back in the Forge 1.17 days, work started for adding JPMS (Java Platform Module Support) to ModLauncher and ForgeModLoader. This has been used internally by Forge and some libraries for a while now, but mods (those with mods.toml specifically) have not been able to take advantage of it. As of Forge 1.21.1 and 1.21.3, this is now possible!   What is JPMS and what does it mean for modders? JPMS is the Java Platform Module System, introduced in Java 9. It allows you to define modules, which are collections of packages and resources that can be exported or hidden from other modules. This allows for much more fine-tuned control over visibility, cleaner syntax for service declarations and support for sealed types across packages. For example, you might have a mod with a module called `com.example.mod` that exports `com.example.mod.api` and `com.example.mod.impl` to other mods, but hides `com.example.mod.internal` from them. This would allow you to have a clean API for other mods to use, while keeping your internal implementation details hidden from IDE hints, helping prevent accidental usage of internals that might break without prior notice. This is particularly useful if you'd like to use public records with module-private constructors or partially module-private record components, as you can create a sealed interface that only your record implements, having the interface be exported and the record hidden. It's also nice for declaring and using services, as you'll get compile-time errors from the Java compiler for typos and the like, rather than deferring to runtime errors. In more advanced cases, you can also have public methods that are only accessible to specific other modules -- handy if you want internal interactions between multiple of your own mods.   How do I bypass it? We understand there may be drama in implementing a system that prevents mods from accessing each other's internals when necessary (like when a mod is abandoned or you need to fix a compat issue) -- after all, we are already modding a game that doesn't have explicit support for Java mods yet. We have already thought of this and are offering APIs from day one to selectively bypass module restrictions. Let me be clear: Forge mods are not required to use JPMS. If you don't want to use it, you don't have to. The default behaviour is to have fully open, fully exported automatic modules. In Java, you can use the `Add-Opens` and `Add-Exports` manifest attributes to selectively bypass module restrictions of other mods at launch time, and we've added explicit support for these when loading your Forge mods. At compile-time, you can use existing solutions such as the extra-java-module-info Gradle plugin to deal with non-modular dependencies and add extra opens and exports to other modules. Here's an example on how to make the internal package `com.example.examplemod.internal` open to your mod in your build.gradle: tasks.named('jar', Jar) { manifest { attributes([ 'Add-Opens' : 'com.example.examplemod/com.example.examplemod.internal' 'Specification-Title' : mod_id, 'Specification-Vendor' : mod_authors // (...) ]) } } With the above in your mod's jar manifest, you can now reflectively access the classes inside that internal package. Multiple entries are separated with a space, as per Java's official spec. You can also use Add-Exports to directly call without reflection, however you'd need to use the Gradle plugin mentioned earlier to be able to compile. The syntax for Add-Exports is the same as Add-Opens, and instructions for the compile-time step with the Gradle plugin are detailed later in this post. Remember to prefer the opens and exports keywords inside module-info.java for sources you control. The Add-Opens/Add-Exports attributes are only intended for forcing open other mods.   What else is new with module support? Previously, the runtime module name was always forced to the first mod ID in your `mods.toml` file and all packages were forced fully open and exported. Module names are now distinguished from mod IDs, meaning the module name in your module-info.java can be different from the mod ID in your `mods.toml`. This allows you to have a more descriptive module name that doesn't have to be the same as your mod ID, however we strongly recommend including your mod ID as part of your module name to aid troubleshooting. The `Automatic-Module-Name` manifest attribute is now also honoured, allowing you to specify a module name for your mod without needing to create a `module-info.java` file. This is particularly useful for mods that don't care about JPMS features but want to have a more descriptive module name and easier integration with other mods that do use JPMS.   How do I use it? The first step is to create a `module-info.java` file in your mod's source directory. This file should be in the same package as your main mod class, and should look something like this: open module com.example.examplemod { requires net.minecraftforge.eventbus; requires net.minecraftforge.fmlcore; requires net.minecraftforge.forge; requires net.minecraftforge.javafmlmod; requires net.minecraftforge.mergetool.api; requires org.slf4j; requires logging; } For now, we're leaving the whole module open to reflection, which is a good starting point. When we know we want to close something off, we can remove the open modifier from the module and open or export individual packages instead. Remember that you need to be open to Forge (module name net.minecraftforge.forge), otherwise it can't call your mod's constructor. Next is fixing modules in Gradle. While Forge and Java support modules properly, Gradle does not put automatic modules on the module path by default, meaning that the logging module (from com.mojang:logging) is not found. To fix this, add the Gradle plugin and add a compile-time module definition for that Mojang library: plugins { // (...) id 'org.gradlex.extra-java-module-info' version "1.9" } // (...) extraJavaModuleInfo { failOnMissingModuleInfo = false automaticModule("com.mojang:logging", "logging") } The automatic module override specified in your build.gradle should match the runtime one to avoid errors. You can do the same for any library or mod dependency that is missing either a module-info or explicit Automatic-Module-Name, however be aware that you may need to update your mod once said library adds one. That's all you need to get started with module support in your mods. You can learn more about modules and how to use them at dev.java.
    • Faire la mise à jour grâce à ce lien m'a aider personnellement, merci à @Paint_Ninja. https://www.amd.com/en/support 
    • When I came across the 'Exit Code: I got a 1 error in my Minecraft mods, so I decided to figure out what was wrong. First, I took a look at the logs. In the mods folder (usually where you'd find logs or crash reports), I found the latest.log file or the corresponding crash report. I read it through carefully, looking for any lines with errors or warnings. Then I checked the Minecraft Forge support site, where you can often find info on what causes errors and how to fix them. I then disabled half of my mods and tried running the game. If the error disappeared, it meant that the problem was with the disabled mod. I repeated this several times to find the problem mod.
    • I have no idea - switch to a pre-configured modpack and use it as working base    
  • Topics

  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.