Jump to content

[1.8] [SOLVED]Client/server conflict when changing blocks? (checkerboard effect)


Ferrettomato

Recommended Posts

I'm trying to make an item that turns water in to ice underfoot. Whenever I try to do this, though, the block changes act a bit glitchy when the player is walking, and the blocks are just in a checkerboard when sprint-jumping. From what I can tell, it's to do with the client and the server having problems with each other. (world.isRemote fixes the glitch, but the blocks revert to water when updated.) Here's my code, can anyone tell me how I can fix it?

 

	public void onArmorTick(World world, EntityPlayer player, ItemStack itemStack)
{
	BlockPos pos = player.getPosition();

	if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(0, -1, 0)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
		world.setBlockState(pos.add(0, -1, 0), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
	if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(1, -1, -1)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
		world.setBlockState(pos.add(1, -1, -1), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
	if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(1, -1, 0)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
		world.setBlockState(pos.add(1, -1, 0), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
	if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(1, -1, 1)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
		world.setBlockState(pos.add(1, -1, 1), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
	if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(0, -1, -1)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
		world.setBlockState(pos.add(0, -1, -1), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
	if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(0, -1, 1)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
		world.setBlockState(pos.add(0, -1, 1), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
	if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(-1, -1, -1)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
		world.setBlockState(pos.add(-1, -1, -1), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
	if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(-1, -1, 0)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
		world.setBlockState(pos.add(-1, -1, 0), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
	if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(-1, -1, 1)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
		world.setBlockState(pos.add(-1, -1, 1), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
}

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BlockPos pos = player.getPosition();

	if(world.isRemote)
	{
		if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(0, -1, 0)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
			world.setBlockState(pos.add(0, -1, 0), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
		if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(1, -1, -1)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
			world.setBlockState(pos.add(1, -1, -1), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
		if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(1, -1, 0)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
			world.setBlockState(pos.add(1, -1, 0), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
		if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(1, -1, 1)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
			world.setBlockState(pos.add(1, -1, 1), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
		if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(0, -1, -1)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
			world.setBlockState(pos.add(0, -1, -1), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
		if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(0, -1, 1)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
			world.setBlockState(pos.add(0, -1, 1), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
		if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(-1, -1, -1)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
			world.setBlockState(pos.add(-1, -1, -1), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
		if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(-1, -1, 0)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
			world.setBlockState(pos.add(-1, -1, 0), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
		if(world.getBlockState(pos.add(-1, -1, 1)).getBlock().equals(Blocks.water))
			world.setBlockState(pos.add(-1, -1, 1), Blocks.ice.getStateFromMeta(0));
	}

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I've changed it to !world.isRemote to correctly check if it's on the server, but now I'm getting the strange checkerboard effect again. (To reiterate, this is only while the player is sprint-jumping along the water. When the player is on the ground, there's a bit of delay on the block directly ahead of the player.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the fact that when you were setting blocks client side you said that it resulted in the correct pattern, you could send a packet from the client to the server with the player's current client-side position information, then the server should be able to figure out what to do from there.

 

If that doesn't work, you could instead send the block position(s) that need to be changed, but it's not generally recommended to let the client dictate any sort of state, but if you really don't want a checkerboard pattern, it might be the only solution.

 

Also, when setting blocks, instead of using getStateFromMeta(0), you should use getDefaultState().

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Realizing I was a victim of a scam was a devastating blow. My initial investment of $89,000, driven by dreams of financial success and the buzz surrounding a new cryptocurrency project, turned into a nightmare. The project promised high returns and rapid gains, attracting many eager investors like myself. However, as time passed and inconsistencies began to surface, it became evident that I had made a grave mistake by not thoroughly vetting the brokerage company handling the investment. Feeling anxious and betrayed, I desperately searched for a way to recover my funds. It was during this frantic search that I stumbled upon the Lee Ultimate Hacker tool through a Facebook post. With little left to lose, I decided to reach out to their team for help. To my relief, they were quick to respond and immediately started recovering my compromised email and regaining access to my cryptocurrency wallets. The team at Lee Ultimate Hacker was incredibly professional and transparent throughout the process. They meticulously traced the digital footprints left by the scammers, employing advanced technological methods to unravel the complex network that had ensnared my funds. Their expertise in cybersecurity and recovery strategies gradually began to turn the tide in my favor. Although the scammers had already siphoned off $30,000 worth of Bitcoin, Lee Ultimate Hacker was relentless in their pursuit. They managed to expose the fraudulent activities of the scam operators, revealing their identities and the mechanisms they used to lure investors. This exposure was crucial not only for my case but also as a warning to the wider community about the perils of unverified investment schemes. As we progressed, it became a race against time to retrieve the remaining $59,000 before the scammers could vanish completely. Each step forward was met with new challenges, as these criminals constantly shifted tactics and moved their digital assets to evade capture. Nonetheless, the determination and skill of the recovery team kept us hopeful. Throughout this ordeal, I learned the hard value of caution and due diligence in investment, especially within the volatile world of cryptocurrency. The experience has been incredibly taxing, both emotionally and financially, but the support and results provided by Lee Ultimate Hacker have been indispensable. The recovery process is ongoing, and while the final outcome remains uncertain, the progress made so far gives me hope. The battle to recover the full amount of my investment continues, and with the expertise of Lee Ultimate Hacker, I remain optimistic about the eventual recovery of my funds. Their commitment to their clients and proficiency in handling such complex cases truly sets them apart in the field of cyber recovery. LEEULTIMATEHACKER@ AOL. COM   Support @ leeultimatehacker . com.  telegram:LEEULTIMATE   wh@tsapp +1  (715) 314  -  9248     
    • Hi everyone. I’m excited to share my experience with CrackerWizard Recovery Firm. They helped me recover a substantial amount of crypto after falling victim to online scams disguised as Bitcoin investments. CrackerWizard’s exceptional service enabled me to retrieve my lost funds, despite the complex circumstances surrounding the case. With their dedicated team and advanced technology, they swiftly traced and recovered my assets. CrackerWizard is a reliable partner in the crypto world, highly recommended for anyone facing similar challenges. Contact them.
    • So I saw that mixin is shipped as a library with forge, but is it available for 1.7.10 ?  
    • So I've read the EULA, and lets be straight...     If I split my modpack(of my mods, yeah I'm nuts) into several(many) individual mods(like just one boss) with minor additions(plus not working together), then have a complete/modpack version on patreon/onlyfans having each addon work together... Would people buy my idea?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.