Jump to content

Do something if item/items are struck by lightning


elbaslito

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

So I am facing some trouble, whereby if item x is struck by lightning the item transforms into another. Basically the item is destroyed and the other item to be transformed into takes its place. I also want to do this with two items, say item a and item b are together and if they are struck by lightning (they are in the same position) they transform into another item. I have managed to do this with blocks, but only through the means of a rod, whereby on right click it summons lightning and through that code it checks if the block struck at the position is what I want it then it transforms it. But I want the block or item itself to check if it has been struck by lightning then transform. That way any lightning bolt from any source can transform it.

 

Thanks for your support :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

So I am facing some trouble, whereby if item x is struck by lightning the item transforms into another. Basically the item is destroyed and the other item to be transformed into takes its place. I also want to do this with two items, say item a and item b are together and if they are struck by lightning (they are in the same position) they transform into another item. I have managed to do this with blocks, but only through the means of a rod, whereby on right click it summons lightning and through that code it checks if the block struck at the position is what I want it then it transforms it. But I want the block or item itself to check if it has been struck by lightning then transform. That way any lightning bolt from any source can transform it.

 

Thanks for your support :)

 

I'm fairly sure there is a EntityStruckByLightningEvent that gets called whenever any entity is about to be hit by lightning. In an event handler, you can check if the entity is an EntityItem and holds the specific item(s) you want, cancel the event (if you want to prevent the items from being set on fire and despawning in the next few ticks), and then do whatever you whatever logic you want. (Checking item and transforming or checking if there are 2 items and transforming, etc)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If one of the items is your own, create a class that extends

EntityItem

and overrides

Entity#onStruckByLightning

to attempt the transformation and then call the super method. Override

Item#hasCustomEntity

to return

true

and override

Item#createEntity

to create an instance of your custom

EntityItem

class at the same location as the

location

argument.

 

If none of the items are your own, subscribe to

EntityStruckByLightningEvent

and check if the entity is an

EntityItem

containing your item before attempting the transformation.

 

I explained how to do something similar (items transforming when near each other in the world) here, you can see my implementation here.

Please don't PM me to ask for help. Asking your question in a public thread preserves it for people who are having the same problem in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Alright, Thanks!!! I will try the subscribe to event thing, its a really good way to handle this (pun not intended). But what if I want it if the block is struck by lightning. The problem here is that there is no BlockStruckByLightning Event, only EntityStruckByLightning. So what do I do in this case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, Thanks!!! I will try the subscribe to event thing, its a really good way to handle this (pun not intended). But what if I want it if the block is struck by lightning. The problem here is that there is no BlockStruckByLightning Event, only EntityStruckByLightning. So what do I do in this case?

 

Either spawn an entity inside the block when it's placed or suggest that Forge add a

BlockStruckByLightningEvent

.

Please don't PM me to ask for help. Asking your question in a public thread preserves it for people who are having the same problem in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lightning bolt is an entity. Would Forge's EntityJoinWorldEvent give you a chance to detect each bolt, look at its coords and do your actions? I haven't traced lightning's execution far enough to see if it is spawned on that path, but it may be worth a try (or further research).

The debugger is a powerful and necessary tool in any IDE, so learn how to use it. You'll be able to tell us more and get better help here if you investigate your runtime problems in the debugger before posting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • rp.crazyheal.xyz mods  
    • I'm developing a dimension, but it's kinda resource intensive so some times during player teleporting it lags behind making the player phase down into the void, so im trying to implement some kind of pregeneration to force the game loading a small set of chunks in the are the player will teleport to. Some of the things i've tried like using ServerLevel and ServerChunkCache methods like getChunk() dont actually trigger chunk generation if the chunk isn't already on persistent storage (already generated) or placing tickets, but that doesn't work either. Ideally i should be able to check when the task has ended too. I've peeked around some pregen engines, but they're too complex for my current understanding of the system of which I have just a basic understanding (how ServerLevel ,ServerChunkCache  and ChunkMap work) of. Any tips or other classes I should be looking into to understand how to do this correctly?
    • https://mclo.gs/4UC49Ao
    • Way back in the Forge 1.17 days, work started for adding JPMS (Java Platform Module Support) to ModLauncher and ForgeModLoader. This has been used internally by Forge and some libraries for a while now, but mods (those with mods.toml specifically) have not been able to take advantage of it. As of Forge 1.21.1 and 1.21.3, this is now possible!   What is JPMS and what does it mean for modders? JPMS is the Java Platform Module System, introduced in Java 9. It allows you to define modules, which are collections of packages and resources that can be exported or hidden from other modules. This allows for much more fine-tuned control over visibility, cleaner syntax for service declarations and support for sealed types across packages. For example, you might have a mod with a module called `com.example.mod` that exports `com.example.mod.api` and `com.example.mod.impl` to other mods, but hides `com.example.mod.internal` from them. This would allow you to have a clean API for other mods to use, while keeping your internal implementation details hidden from IDE hints, helping prevent accidental usage of internals that might break without prior notice. This is particularly useful if you'd like to use public records with module-private constructors or partially module-private record components, as you can create a sealed interface that only your record implements, having the interface be exported and the record hidden. It's also nice for declaring and using services, as you'll get compile-time errors from the Java compiler for typos and the like, rather than deferring to runtime errors. In more advanced cases, you can also have public methods that are only accessible to specific other modules -- handy if you want internal interactions between multiple of your own mods.   How do I bypass it? We understand there may be drama in implementing a system that prevents mods from accessing each other's internals when necessary (like when a mod is abandoned or you need to fix a compat issue) -- after all, we are already modding a game that doesn't have explicit support for Java mods yet. We have already thought of this and are offering APIs from day one to selectively bypass module restrictions. Let me be clear: Forge mods are not required to use JPMS. If you don't want to use it, you don't have to. The default behaviour is to have fully open, fully exported automatic modules. In Java, you can use the `Add-Opens` and `Add-Exports` manifest attributes to selectively bypass module restrictions of other mods at launch time, and we've added explicit support for these when loading your Forge mods. At compile-time, you can use existing solutions such as the extra-java-module-info Gradle plugin to deal with non-modular dependencies and add extra opens and exports to other modules. Here's an example on how to make the internal package `com.example.examplemod.internal` open to your mod in your build.gradle: tasks.named('jar', Jar) { manifest { attributes([ 'Add-Opens' : 'com.example.examplemod/com.example.examplemod.internal' 'Specification-Title' : mod_id, 'Specification-Vendor' : mod_authors // (...) ]) } } With the above in your mod's jar manifest, you can now reflectively access the classes inside that internal package. Multiple entries are separated with a space, as per Java's official spec. You can also use Add-Exports to directly call without reflection, however you'd need to use the Gradle plugin mentioned earlier to be able to compile. The syntax for Add-Exports is the same as Add-Opens, and instructions for the compile-time step with the Gradle plugin are detailed later in this post. Remember to prefer the opens and exports keywords inside module-info.java for sources you control. The Add-Opens/Add-Exports attributes are only intended for forcing open other mods.   What else is new with module support? Previously, the runtime module name was always forced to the first mod ID in your `mods.toml` file and all packages were forced fully open and exported. Module names are now distinguished from mod IDs, meaning the module name in your module-info.java can be different from the mod ID in your `mods.toml`. This allows you to have a more descriptive module name that doesn't have to be the same as your mod ID, however we strongly recommend including your mod ID as part of your module name to aid troubleshooting. The `Automatic-Module-Name` manifest attribute is now also honoured, allowing you to specify a module name for your mod without needing to create a `module-info.java` file. This is particularly useful for mods that don't care about JPMS features but want to have a more descriptive module name and easier integration with other mods that do use JPMS.   How do I use it? The first step is to create a `module-info.java` file in your mod's source directory. This file should be in the same package as your main mod class, and should look something like this: open module com.example.examplemod { requires net.minecraftforge.eventbus; requires net.minecraftforge.fmlcore; requires net.minecraftforge.forge; requires net.minecraftforge.javafmlmod; requires net.minecraftforge.mergetool.api; requires org.slf4j; requires logging; } For now, we're leaving the whole module open to reflection, which is a good starting point. When we know we want to close something off, we can remove the open modifier from the module and open or export individual packages instead. Remember that you need to be open to Forge (module name net.minecraftforge.forge), otherwise it can't call your mod's constructor. Next is fixing modules in Gradle. While Forge and Java support modules properly, Gradle does not put automatic modules on the module path by default, meaning that the logging module (from com.mojang:logging) is not found. To fix this, add the Gradle plugin and add a compile-time module definition for that Mojang library: plugins { // (...) id 'org.gradlex.extra-java-module-info' version "1.9" } // (...) extraJavaModuleInfo { failOnMissingModuleInfo = false automaticModule("com.mojang:logging", "logging") } The automatic module override specified in your build.gradle should match the runtime one to avoid errors. You can do the same for any library or mod dependency that is missing either a module-info or explicit Automatic-Module-Name, however be aware that you may need to update your mod once said library adds one. That's all you need to get started with module support in your mods. You can learn more about modules and how to use them at dev.java.
    • Faire la mise à jour grâce à ce lien m'a aider personnellement, merci à @Paint_Ninja. https://www.amd.com/en/support 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.