Jump to content

[SOLVED][1.14.4] Rendering Glitches with BlockRenderLayer.TRANSLUCENT


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Some parts of my block model are rendering over others where they shouldn't. I'm sure this is due to using BlockRenderLayer.TRANSLUCENT for the block. What can I do to avoid these bugs?

2019-11-18_17_50_22.png.0910602928f88376e9e73f7120f442b9.png

Edited by deerangle
solved
Posted

Your problem seems to be similar to this one. If the block is a TESR or FastTESR, then you should be able to solve it with the same solution as I suggested there.

(That is a 1.12.2 post, however, so the method names might be a little different. I suspect the underlying rendering code is pretty much the same, though.)

Fancy 3D Graphing Calculator mod, with many different coordinate systems.

Lightweight 3D/2D position/vector transformations library, also with support for different coordinate systems.

Posted

I have the same issue, and sadly turning my blocks into tile entities won't be viable for me. Using a custom baked model and sorting the vertex data there would be an option, though. The trouble then is figuring out how to actually do that properly...

  • Like 2

I'm eager to learn and am prone to mistakes. Don't hesitate to tell me how I can improve.

Posted (edited)

I created a complex block model to showcase the severity of the issue some more:

Spoiler

layers.gif.25f565a8f7af664864bacd60db68649a.gif

Seems like BufferBuilder#sortVertexData() is only ever called to re-sort translucence vertices inside ChunkRender#postRenderBlocks(), which implies that manually sorting them ourselves in baked models may not be possible, but don't quote me on that.

 

For now, a viable workaround would be to separate the problematic model into distinct "solid" and "transparent" models, then re-combine them in a single baked model by rendering them on the correct layers. You can check the current layer being rendered by using the static MinecraftForgeClient#getRenderLayer() method. The block would need to return true for both the solid and translucent layers, of course.

 

This workaround isn't perfect, since quads that still need to render on the translucent layer won't be "fixed", but it will mitigate the problem for many cases. If it really comes down to it, using a tile entity may have to be a last resort if a better fix can't be found.

 

Edit: Forge's multi-layer-model system would be a perfect way of implementing this solution, and would remove the need to write a custom baked model yourself. However, as of writing this, that feature is currently inaccessible. For now, you will have to implement this yourself.

Edited by imacatlolol
  • Like 1

I'm eager to learn and am prone to mistakes. Don't hesitate to tell me how I can improve.

Posted

So I got some things working. I can now correctly render my Blocks with translucent and solid layers using the MultiLayerModel class (or in my case an edited version of that class to manage particle textures, but its essentially the same). Now I would like to rotate my models, as the Block I'm making the model for is a HorizontalBlock. Currently, this is my code:

@SubscribeEvent
public static void onModelBake(ModelBakeEvent event) {
    ModelResourceLocation wooden_frame_location = new ModelResourceLocation(new ResourceLocation(LaserMod.MODID, "wooden_frame"), "");
    ModelResourceLocation orange_glass_location = new ModelResourceLocation(new ResourceLocation(LaserMod.MODID, "orange_glass"), "");

    IBakedModel wooden_frame = getBakedModel(new ResourceLocation(LaserMod.MODID, "wooden_frame"), event.getModelLoader(), ModelRotation.X0_Y0);
    event.getModelRegistry().put(wooden_frame_location, wooden_frame);

    IBakedModel orange_glass = getBakedModel(new ResourceLocation(LaserMod.MODID, "orange_glass"), event.getModelLoader(), ModelRotation.X0_Y90);
    event.getModelRegistry().put(orange_glass_location, orange_glass);

    IBakedModel orange_wooden_lens = makeLensModel(wooden_frame_location, orange_glass_location, event.getModelLoader(), ModelRotation.X0_Y90, new ResourceLocation("block/oak_log_top"));
    event.getModelRegistry().put(new ModelResourceLocation(new ResourceLocation(LaserMod.MODID, "orange_wooden_lens"), "distance=8,facing=south"), orange_wooden_lens);
}

private static IBakedModel makeLensModel(ModelResourceLocation solid, ModelResourceLocation translucent, ModelLoader loader, ModelRotation rotation, ResourceLocation particle) {
    ImmutableMap<Optional<BlockRenderLayer>, ModelResourceLocation> map = ImmutableMap.<Optional<BlockRenderLayer>, ModelResourceLocation>builder()
            .put(Optional.of(BlockRenderLayer.SOLID), solid)
            .put(Optional.of(BlockRenderLayer.TRANSLUCENT), translucent)
            .build();
    LensModel model = new LensModel(map, particle);
    return bakeModel(model, loader, rotation);
}

private static IBakedModel getBakedModel(ResourceLocation location, ModelLoader loader, ModelRotation rotation) {
    BlockModel model = (BlockModel) loader.getUnbakedModel(location);
    return bakeModel(model, loader, rotation);
}

private static IBakedModel bakeModel(IUnbakedModel model, ModelLoader loader, ModelRotation rotation) {
    return model.bake(loader, ModelLoader.defaultTextureGetter(), new BasicState(TRSRTransformation.from(rotation), false), DefaultVertexFormats.BLOCK);
}

As you can see I tried inputting ModelRotations when calling the bake method, but with no success... The model looks exactly the same, no matter what rotation values I use. I really don't want to make extra models to have rotation, so I am asking how I can rotate my models before (or maybe even after) baking?

Posted

Fixed it by changing the bake method in the MultiLayerModel (or LensModel in my case) to get BlockModels instead of VariantLists. BlockModels can be rotated, and that's why It's now working

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • When I first heard about Bitcoin back in 2018, I was skeptical. The idea of a decentralized, digital currency seemed too good to be true. But I was intrigued as I learned more about the technology behind it and its potential. I started small, investing just a few hundred dollars, dipping my toes into the cryptocurrency waters. At first, it was exhilarating to watch the value of my investment grow exponentially. I felt like I was part of the future, an early adopter of this revolutionary new asset. But that euphoria was short-lived. One day, I logged into my digital wallet only to find it empty - my Bitcoin had vanished without a trace. It turned out that the online exchange I had trusted had been hacked, and my funds were stolen. I was devastated, both financially and emotionally. All the potential I had seen in Bitcoin was tainted by the harsh reality that with decentralization came a lack of regulation and oversight. My hard-earned money was gone, lost to the ether of the digital world. This experience taught me a painful lesson about the price of trust in the uncharted territory of cryptocurrency. While the technology holds incredible promise, the risks can be catastrophic if you don't approach it with extreme caution. My Bitcoin investment gamble had failed, and I was left to pick up the pieces, wiser but poorer for having placed my faith in the wrong hands. My sincere appreciation goes to MUYERN TRUST HACKER. You are my hero in recovering my lost funds. Send a direct m a i l ( muyerntrusted ( @ ) mail-me ( . )c o m ) or message on whats app : + 1 ( 4-4-0 ) ( 3 -3 -5 ) ( 0-2-0-5 )
    • You could try posting a log (if there is no log at all, it may be the launcher you are using, the FAQ may have info on how to enable the log) as described in the FAQ, however this will probably need to be reported to/remedied by the mod author.
    • So me and a couple of friends are playing with a shitpost mod pack and one of the mods in the pack is corail tombstone and for some reason there is a problem with it, where on death to fire the player will get kicked out of the server and the tombstone will not spawn basically deleting an entire inventory, it doesn't matter what type of fire it is, whether it's from vanilla fire/lava, or from modded fire like ice&fire/lycanites and it's common enough to where everyone on the server has experienced at least once or twice and it doesn't give any crash log. a solution to this would be much appreciated thank you!
    • It is 1.12.2 - I have no idea if there is a 1.12 pack
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.