Jump to content

Sword damage/tool efficiency based on NBT


decebaldecebal

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Like the title says, I want to set a swords damage vs entity to a value in an NBT tag.

 

I have a sword with a container item where you can insert a specific item in a slot and based on that item I am writing NBT data to the sword item.I have searched in the ItemSword and Item class but I could not find a functions that allows this.All the functions that deal with damage are called once when the game is loaded.

 

Also I have anther questions that is related to this one.I want to make a pickaxe that changes the efficiencyOnProperMaterial field based on NBT data like the sword, but I could not find how to do this either.

 

I plan to make a hole set of tools that have a container and that change certain aspects of them like damage vs entity, efficiency and total damage(which I know how to set because there is a function for that in the Item class).

 

Why aren't there such functions or the damage vs entity and efficiency in the Item class or ItemTool class or am I just missing them?

 

Thank you for your help.

 

EDIT: Is it also possible to add an enchantment effect based on NBT?

 

EDIT 2: Sorry for so many edits, but I just want to ask you your opinion on this piece of code:

	@Override
public boolean onBlockStartBreak(ItemStack itemstack, int X, int Y, int Z, EntityPlayer player)
{
	if (this.getDamage(itemstack) >= 498 && player.capabilities.isCreativeMode == false)
		return true;
	return false;
}

Currently I use this method on my custom pickaxe.My pickaxe is unbreakable and uses a custom fuel I made to recharge it's durability.My question is:

 

Is there a better way to do it so the tool is indestructible and only works if it is recharged with my custom fuel?

 

 

Sorry for all these questions, haven't posted on this forum for a while and now I remember all the problems I wanted to ask here but found a solution myself for them :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked at Modular Powersuits source code and I've created an hitEntity function that works but I am not sure if I am doing things properly.

 

	@Override
    public boolean hitEntity(ItemStack par1ItemStack, EntityLivingBase par2EntityLivingBase, EntityLivingBase par3EntityLivingBase)
    {
    	if (this.getDamage(par1ItemStack) >= 998)
    		return false;
    	float damage = weaponDamage;
    	if(par1ItemStack.hasTagCompound())
    	{
    		System.out.println("works");
		if(par1ItemStack.getTagCompound().getInteger("speed")==1)
		{
			System.out.println("works1");
			damage+=2.0F;
		}
    	}
    	DamageSource damagesource = DamageSource.causePlayerDamage((EntityPlayer)par3EntityLivingBase);
    	par2EntityLivingBase.attackEntityFrom(damagesource, damage);
    	par1ItemStack.damageItem(1, par3EntityLivingBase);
    	return true;
    }

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can see damage change in ItemSword, and harvest in ItemTool, though ForgeHooks contains a hook in case you need it.

 

I am quite sure you can add enchantment at any time, I'd look at ItemEnchantedBook if I were you.

 

This.

player.capabilities.isCreativeMode == false

is wrong.

Fix, please  :-\

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can see damage change in ItemSword, and harvest in ItemTool, though ForgeHooks contains a hook in case you need it.

 

I am quite sure you can add enchantment at any time, I'd look at ItemEnchantedBook if I were you.

 

This.

player.capabilities.isCreativeMode == false

is wrong.

Fix, please  :-\

 

Can you please be more specific?I have searched the ItemSword class and ItemTool class for functions that allow what I am saying, only private fields that are used only when the constructor is called.

 

Also why is

player.capabilities.isCreativeMode == false

wrong?

It works, when the player is in creative mode it still allows them to destroy the blocks even when the durability is bigger than 998.Should I not check for it because creative mode handles things differently?I will try and see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you found weaponDamage in ItemSword, but didn't search where it is used in the class ?  ???

You couldn't found the "Weapon modifier" AttributeModifier ?

You found efficiencyOnProperMaterial in ItemTool, but couldn't find getStrVsBlock method ?

 

It should be !player.capabilities.isCreativeMode , obviously...where did you learn to code ?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you found weaponDamage in ItemSword, but didn't search where it is used in the class ?  ???

You couldn't found the "Weapon modifier" AttributeModifier ?

You found efficiencyOnProperMaterial in ItemTool, but couldn't find getStrVsBlock method ?

 

It should be !player.capabilities.isCreativeMode , obviously...where did you learn to code ?

 

The public Multimap func_111205_h() uses the variable but I tried overwriting that function and I used a custom variable but it did not work, that's why I am asking on this forum.I already tried everything that I can think of and the only thing that works is how Modular Powersuits does it.

 

I knew the getStrVsBlock function but I didn't want to use it because if I make a custom tool that extends the ToolPickaxe class but is classified as a shovel with MinecraftForge.setToolClass(this, "shovel", 3);

then the getStrVsBlock function has to be heavily modified and I didn't want to do that.Anyways, I may try that if that is the only solution.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The future of Bitcoin recovery is a topic of great interest and excitement, particularly with the emergence of innovative companies like Dexdert Net Pro Recovery leading the charge. As the cryptocurrency market continues to evolve and face new challenges, the need for effective solutions to help users recover lost or stolen Bitcoin has become increasingly critical. Dexdert Net Pro, a specialized firm dedicated to this very purpose, has positioned itself at the forefront of this emerging field. Through their proprietary techniques and deep expertise in blockchain technology, Dexdert Net Pro has developed a comprehensive approach to tracking down and retrieving misplaced or compromised Bitcoin, providing a lifeline to individuals and businesses who have fallen victim to the inherent risks of the digital currency landscape. Their team of seasoned investigators and cryptography experts employ a meticulous, multi-pronged strategy, leveraging advanced data analysis, forensic techniques, and collaborative partnerships with law enforcement to painstakingly trace the movement of lost or stolen coins, often recovering funds that would otherwise be considered irrecoverable. This pioneering work not only restores financial assets but also helps to bolster confidence and trust in the long-term viability of Bitcoin, cementing Dexdert Net Pro role as a crucial player in shaping the future of cryptocurrency recovery and security. As the digital finance ecosystem continues to evolve, the importance of innovative solutions like those offered by Dexdert Net Pro will only grow, ensuring that users can navigate the complexities of Bitcoin with greater peace of mind and protection. Call Dexdert Net Pro now     
    • I'm developing a dimension, but it's kinda resource intensive so some times during player teleporting it lags behind making the player phase down into the void, so im trying to implement some kind of pregeneration to force the game loading a small set of chunks in the are the player will teleport to. Some of the things i've tried like using ServerLevel and ServerChunkCache methods like getChunk() dont actually trigger chunk generation if the chunk isn't already on persistent storage (already generated) or placing tickets, but that doesn't work either. Ideally i should be able to check when the task has ended too. I've peeked around some pregen engines, but they're too complex for my current understanding of the system of which I have just a basic understanding (how ServerLevel ,ServerChunkCache  and ChunkMap work) of. Any tips or other classes I should be looking into to understand how to do this correctly?
    • https://mclo.gs/4UC49Ao
    • Way back in the Forge 1.17 days, work started for adding JPMS (Java Platform Module Support) to ModLauncher and ForgeModLoader. This has been used internally by Forge and some libraries for a while now, but mods (those with mods.toml specifically) have not been able to take advantage of it. As of Forge 1.21.1 and 1.21.3, this is now possible!   What is JPMS and what does it mean for modders? JPMS is the Java Platform Module System, introduced in Java 9. It allows you to define modules, which are collections of packages and resources that can be exported or hidden from other modules. This allows for much more fine-tuned control over visibility, cleaner syntax for service declarations and support for sealed types across packages. For example, you might have a mod with a module called `com.example.mod` that exports `com.example.mod.api` and `com.example.mod.impl` to other mods, but hides `com.example.mod.internal` from them. This would allow you to have a clean API for other mods to use, while keeping your internal implementation details hidden from IDE hints, helping prevent accidental usage of internals that might break without prior notice. This is particularly useful if you'd like to use public records with module-private constructors or partially module-private record components, as you can create a sealed interface that only your record implements, having the interface be exported and the record hidden. It's also nice for declaring and using services, as you'll get compile-time errors from the Java compiler for typos and the like, rather than deferring to runtime errors. In more advanced cases, you can also have public methods that are only accessible to specific other modules -- handy if you want internal interactions between multiple of your own mods.   How do I bypass it? We understand there may be drama in implementing a system that prevents mods from accessing each other's internals when necessary (like when a mod is abandoned or you need to fix a compat issue) -- after all, we are already modding a game that doesn't have explicit support for Java mods yet. We have already thought of this and are offering APIs from day one to selectively bypass module restrictions. Let me be clear: Forge mods are not required to use JPMS. If you don't want to use it, you don't have to. The default behaviour is to have fully open, fully exported automatic modules. In Java, you can use the `Add-Opens` and `Add-Exports` manifest attributes to selectively bypass module restrictions of other mods at launch time, and we've added explicit support for these when loading your Forge mods. At compile-time, you can use existing solutions such as the extra-java-module-info Gradle plugin to deal with non-modular dependencies and add extra opens and exports to other modules. Here's an example on how to make the internal package `com.example.examplemod.internal` open to your mod in your build.gradle: tasks.named('jar', Jar) { manifest { attributes([ 'Add-Opens' : 'com.example.examplemod/com.example.examplemod.internal' 'Specification-Title' : mod_id, 'Specification-Vendor' : mod_authors // (...) ]) } } With the above in your mod's jar manifest, you can now reflectively access the classes inside that internal package. Multiple entries are separated with a space, as per Java's official spec. You can also use Add-Exports to directly call without reflection, however you'd need to use the Gradle plugin mentioned earlier to be able to compile. The syntax for Add-Exports is the same as Add-Opens, and instructions for the compile-time step with the Gradle plugin are detailed later in this post. Remember to prefer the opens and exports keywords inside module-info.java for sources you control. The Add-Opens/Add-Exports attributes are only intended for forcing open other mods.   What else is new with module support? Previously, the runtime module name was always forced to the first mod ID in your `mods.toml` file and all packages were forced fully open and exported. Module names are now distinguished from mod IDs, meaning the module name in your module-info.java can be different from the mod ID in your `mods.toml`. This allows you to have a more descriptive module name that doesn't have to be the same as your mod ID, however we strongly recommend including your mod ID as part of your module name to aid troubleshooting. The `Automatic-Module-Name` manifest attribute is now also honoured, allowing you to specify a module name for your mod without needing to create a `module-info.java` file. This is particularly useful for mods that don't care about JPMS features but want to have a more descriptive module name and easier integration with other mods that do use JPMS.   How do I use it? The first step is to create a `module-info.java` file in your mod's source directory. This file should be in the same package as your main mod class, and should look something like this: open module com.example.examplemod { requires net.minecraftforge.eventbus; requires net.minecraftforge.fmlcore; requires net.minecraftforge.forge; requires net.minecraftforge.javafmlmod; requires net.minecraftforge.mergetool.api; requires org.slf4j; requires logging; } For now, we're leaving the whole module open to reflection, which is a good starting point. When we know we want to close something off, we can remove the open modifier from the module and open or export individual packages instead. Remember that you need to be open to Forge (module name net.minecraftforge.forge), otherwise it can't call your mod's constructor. Next is fixing modules in Gradle. While Forge and Java support modules properly, Gradle does not put automatic modules on the module path by default, meaning that the logging module (from com.mojang:logging) is not found. To fix this, add the Gradle plugin and add a compile-time module definition for that Mojang library: plugins { // (...) id 'org.gradlex.extra-java-module-info' version "1.9" } // (...) extraJavaModuleInfo { failOnMissingModuleInfo = false automaticModule("com.mojang:logging", "logging") } The automatic module override specified in your build.gradle should match the runtime one to avoid errors. You can do the same for any library or mod dependency that is missing either a module-info or explicit Automatic-Module-Name, however be aware that you may need to update your mod once said library adds one. That's all you need to get started with module support in your mods. You can learn more about modules and how to use them at dev.java.
    • Faire la mise à jour grâce à ce lien m'a aider personnellement, merci à @Paint_Ninja. https://www.amd.com/en/support 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.