Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Following the method outlined by diesieben07 here, I'm attempting to override a texture for a custom potion. I (think?) I have the full ModelBakeEvent implemented, but I'm not sure if it's running, as I get no response similar to here. The new model is being added in the ModelRegistryEvent though. Below are my event classes and item model. Thanks!

Spoiler
@Mod.EventBusSubscriber(modid = Main.MOD_ID, bus = Mod.EventBusSubscriber.Bus.MOD)
public class ModSubscribeModEvents {

    @SubscribeEvent
    public static void onModelRegistry(ModelRegistryEvent event) {
        System.out.println("Added model");
        ModelLoader.addSpecialModel(new ResourceLocation(Main.MOD_ID, "item/new_potion_model"));
    }
}
Spoiler
@Mod.EventBusSubscriber(modid = Main.MOD_ID)
public class ModSubscribeForgeEvents {

    @SubscribeEvent
    public void onModelBake(ModelBakeEvent event) {
        IBakedModel oldModel = event.getModelRegistry().get(new ModelResourceLocation("minecraft:potion#inventory"));
        ModelResourceLocation newLocation = new ModelResourceLocation("mod_id:new_potion_model#inventory");
        IBakedModel newModel = event.getModelRegistry().get(newLocation);
        ItemOverrideList newList0 = newModel.getOverrides();
        System.out.println("Check1");

        ItemOverrideList newList1 = new ItemOverrideList() {
            @Override
            public IBakedModel resolve(IBakedModel model, ItemStack stack, @Nullable ClientWorld clientWorld, @Nullable LivingEntity livingEntity) {
                if (stack.getItem() instanceof PotionItem) {
                    if (PotionUtils.getPotion(stack) == ModEffects.MY_POTION.get()) {
                        System.out.println("Check2");
                        return newModel;
                    }
                }
                return super.resolve(model, stack, clientWorld, livingEntity);
            }

            @Override
            public ImmutableList<ItemOverride> getOverrides() {
                return newList0.getOverrides();
            }
        };

        BakedModelWrapper newBakedModelWrapper = new BakedModelWrapper(oldModel) {
            @Override
            public ItemOverrideList getOverrides() {
                return newList1;
            }
        };
        event.getModelRegistry().put(newLocation, newBakedModelWrapper);
    }
}

 

Spoiler
{
    "parent": "item/generated",
    "textures": {
        "layer0": "extra:item/new_potion_texture",
        "layer1": "extra:item/blank"
    }
}

 

Edited by urbanxx001
Posted (edited)

Thanks. Sorry for the stupid mistake. The event is firing, but I'm not sure what to do with getOverrides(), unlike resolve() that has constructor parameters to check with. Trying to return or use newList0.getOverrides() here is null. The resource location should be correct.

Edited by urbanxx001
Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, diesieben07 said:

You should seriously name your variables better.

Yeah I was confused and labeled both as newList. I'm returning:

ImmutableList<ItemOverride> oldList = oldModel.getOverrides().getOverrides();

in newList1.getOverride now.

I'm not sure what using oldList in newList1.resolve would do though, since the checks for the itemstack already exist, and new model is returned here. Unless it's for another form of check (what vanilla does). I also can't debug resolve as console outputs there don't work (or something's preventing it).

I appreciate your help. I've read the forge docs and tried finding similar examples, but this event hack is something else.

Edited by urbanxx001
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, diesieben07 said:

Show updated code.

Spoiler
public class ModelBakeHandler {

    @SubscribeEvent
    public void onModelBake(ModelBakeEvent event) {
        IBakedModel oldModel = event.getModelRegistry().get(new ModelResourceLocation(new ResourceLocation("minecraft", "potion"), "inventory"));
        ImmutableList<ItemOverride> oldImmutableList = oldModel.getOverrides().getOverrides();
        List<ItemOverride> oldList = new ArrayList<>(oldImmutableList);
        ModelResourceLocation newLocation = new ModelResourceLocation(new ResourceLocation("mod_id", "new_potion_model"), "inventory");
        IBakedModel newModel = event.getModelRegistry().get(newLocation);

        ItemOverrideList newList = new ItemOverrideList() {
            @Override
            public IBakedModel resolve(IBakedModel model, ItemStack stack, @Nullable ClientWorld clientWorld, @Nullable LivingEntity livingEntity) {
                if (!oldList.isEmpty()) { // Necessary? Assume list is single entry so don't loop through it like vanilla
                    if (PotionUtils.getPotion(stack) == ModEffects.MY_POTION.get()) {
                        if (newModel == null) { // In case resource location is bad
                            return model;
                        }
                        return newModel;
                    }
                }
                return super.resolve(model, stack, clientWorld, livingEntity);
            }
            @Override
            public ImmutableList<ItemOverride> getOverrides() {
                return oldImmutableList;
            }
        };

        BakedModelWrapper newBakedModelWrapper = new BakedModelWrapper(oldModel) {
            @Override
            public ItemOverrideList getOverrides() {
                return newList;
            }
        };
        event.getModelRegistry().put(newLocation, newBakedModelWrapper);
    }

}

 

Edited by urbanxx001
Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, diesieben07 said:

No. Refer to oldModel.getOverrides.

Understood, the return for newList.resolve() should be oldModel.getOverrides().resolve(params). It didn't dawn on me that 'proceed as previously' in step 4 referred to the oldModel here as well instead of the method's super, but it makes sense since you specified it should in step 3.

In newList.getOverrides, oldImmutableList already derives from oldModel.getOverrides, but I'll inline the variable if it makes a difference (oldModel.getOverrides().getOverrides())

Edited by urbanxx001
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Meant to follow up on this, but I discovered that brewing recipes can also be registered to BrewingRecipeRegistry vs trying to swap out textures for potions. I was only familiar with the reflection method, but it's neat that there's two ways. Doesn't address the original problem, but code below for future visitors:

Registry:

private static void commonSetup(FMLCommonSetupEvent event) {
    event.enqueueWork(() -> {
		ModEffects.addBrews1();
    });
	ModEffects.addBrews2();
}

Methods:

public class ModEffects extends Effects {

    public static final DeferredRegister<Effect> EFFECTS = DeferredRegister.create(ForgeRegistries.POTIONS, Main.MOD_ID);
    public static final DeferredRegister<Potion> POTIONS = DeferredRegister.create(ForgeRegistries.POTION_TYPES, Main.MOD_ID);

    public static RegistryObject<Effect> MY_EFFECT    = EFFECTS.register("my_effect", MyEffect::new);
    public static final RegistryObject<Potion> MY_POTION     = POTIONS.register("my_potion", () -> new Potion(new EffectInstance(MY_EFFECT.get(), 1)));
      
    // Method 1
      
    public static void addBrews1() {
      BrewingRecipeRegistry.addRecipe(Ingredient.of(ModItems.INPUT_ITEM), Ingredient.of(ModItems.INGREDIENT_ITEM), new ItemStack(ModItems.OUTPUT_ITEM));
    } 
      
    // Method 2 (vanilla-style, adds splash, lingering, and arrow variants)  
      
    private static Method brewing_mixes;

    private static void addMix(Potion start, Item ingredient, Potion result) {
        if (brewing_mixes == null) {
            brewing_mixes = ObfuscationReflectionHelper.findMethod(PotionBrewing.class, "addMix", Potion.class, Item.class, Potion.class);
            brewing_mixes.setAccessible(true);
        }
        try {
            brewing_mixes.invoke(null, start, ingredient, result);
        } catch(IllegalAccessException | IllegalArgumentException | InvocationTargetException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }

    public static void addBrews2() {
        addMix(Potions.AWKWARD, ModItems.INGREDIENT_ITEM, MY_POTION.get());
    }
}

 

Edited by urbanxx001

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I’m working on a Manta Ray entity in MCreator using GeckoLib animations, and my goal is to have a looping (flip) animation that ends at −360°, then transitions seamlessly into a swim animation starting at 0°. However, every method I’ve tried—like quickly interpolating the angle, inserting a brief keyframe at 0°, or using a micro “bridge” animation—still causes a visible “flash” https://imgur.com/a/5ucjUb9 or "jump" when the rotation resets. I want a perfectly smooth motion from the flip’s final rotation to the swim’s initial rotation. If anyone has solved this in MCreator/GeckoLib, or found a better trick for handling the −360° →0° gap without a snap, I’d appreciate some advice ! P.S.- I cannot set swim to start at -360 because I would have the same issue but in reverse. Here's the custom LoopingAnimationGoal :   class LoopingAnimationGoal extends Goal { private final MantaRayEntity entity; private final int cooldownTime; private int animationTimer; private int cooldownTimer; // New boolean to prevent double calls private boolean isLoopingActive = false; public LoopingAnimationGoal(MantaRayEntity entity, int cooldownTime) { this.entity = entity; this.cooldownTime = cooldownTime; this.animationTimer = 0; this.cooldownTimer = 0; this.setFlags(EnumSet.of(Flag.MOVE, Flag.LOOK)); } @Override public boolean canUse() { System.out.println("[DEBUG] LoopingGoal canUse => cooldownTimer=" + cooldownTimer); if (cooldownTimer > 0) { cooldownTimer--; return false; } BlockPos entityPos = entity.blockPosition(); boolean canUse = entity.isWaterAbove(entityPos, 4); System.out.println("[DEBUG] LoopingGoal canUse => WATER " + (canUse ? "DETECTED" : "NOT DETECTED") + " at " + entityPos + ", returning " + canUse); return canUse; } @Override public void start() { entity.setAnimation("looping"); animationTimer = 63; isLoopingActive = true; System.out.println("[DEBUG] Looping animation STARTED. Timer=" + animationTimer + ", gameTime=" + entity.level().getGameTime()); } @Override public boolean canContinueToUse() { System.out.println("[DEBUG] LoopingGoal canContinueToUse => animationTimer=" + animationTimer); return animationTimer > 0; } @Override public void tick() { animationTimer--; System.out.println("[DEBUG] LoopingGoal TICK => animationTimer=" + animationTimer); // We stop ONLY if we are still looping if (animationTimer <= 0 && isLoopingActive) { System.out.println("[DEBUG] condition => animationTimer <= 0 && isLoopingActive"); stop(); } } @Override public void stop() { // Check if already stopped if (!isLoopingActive) { System.out.println("[DEBUG] stop() called again, but isLoopingActive = false. Doing nothing."); return; } System.out.println("[DEBUG] Looping STOP at tick=" + entity.level().getGameTime() + ", last known rotation=" + entity.getXRot() + "/" + entity.getYRot() + ", animationTimer=" + animationTimer); // Immediately switch to "swim" entity.setAnimation("swim"); // Reset cooldown cooldownTimer = cooldownTime; // Disable looping to prevent a second stop isLoopingActive = false; System.out.println("[DEBUG] Looping STOP => setAnimation('swim'), cooldownTimer=" + cooldownTimer); } }  
    • So is the intention of the crusher for ores meant to be used with a silk touch pickaxe or something? Cause that seems like too much effort just to profit off of the machine, when everything drops as raw materials now. Am I just missing something? 
    • Update your AMD/ATI drivers - get the drivers from their website - do not update via system  
  • Topics

  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.