Jump to content

[1.6.2] Fire doesn't extinguish correctly


sep87x

Recommended Posts

Hey lads and gents,

 

I've released a mod yesterday which went pretty well on the Minecraft Forums and Planet Minecraft last night (see here). This mod is about extinguishing fire by blowing into your microphone. Anyway, today I recognized an annoying bug. When I try to extinguish the fire (simply setting block ID to 0), it kinda still exists and creates new fires around the fire which has been "extinguished" ... sometimes at very unusual places like 4 blocks away from the source.

 

I found the extinguishFire() method in the World.java and I tried it, but I found out that it does pretty much the same. It simply sets a new air block instead of the fire block, but I know that this doesn't really work out. Ridiculously, this case only appears when the fire is at the bottom of a block or on the side of a block. Not when the fire is on top of the block. Can anyone help me out? This starts to get really annoying. I'll provide you with code if needed, but I think I explained pretty much all you need :D

 

Greetings from Germany

~sep87x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

/push

 

Does no one have an idea? I'm a bit in trouble now because the hype about this mod just started and I NEED to get rid of this bug. I have tried some more methods like posting the PlayerInteractEvent to the event bus, use world.setBlockToAir() (also used by the BlockFire class) but none of these worked.

 

I found some further information about this bug. When I try to replace the block with air, the fire still exists, but it is invisible, so players and mobs can still get caught on fire. I don't even need a piece of code to fix this, just tell me your suggestions.

 

~sep87x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The part of the code you used that turns the block from fire to 0 would be helpful

 

Either way though, I would've though extinguishFire() would work... but seeing the code would help to work out where it's gone wrong

 

also

that mod sounds REALLY awesome

I don't think I've ever seen a mod like that before

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the code which extinguishes the fire. All commented lines are things that I tried and never worked.

 

if (sysTime - f.startTime >= 500 + 500 * d) {
//Block.fire.onBlockClicked(world, x, y, z, player);
//Block.fire.breakBlock(world, x, y, z, 0, 0);
//Block.fire.onBlockDestroyedByPlayer(world, x, y, z, 0);
//world.setBlockToAir(x, y, z);
//world.setBlock(x, y, z, 0);
//MinecraftForge.EVENT_BUS.post(new PlayerInteractEvent(player, Action.LEFT_CLICK_BLOCK, x, y, z, 1));

/**for (int i = 0; i <= 5; i++) {
	world.extinguishFire(player, x, y, z, i);
}**/
}

 

The variable f is an object called "FireState". It contains the coordinate of a fire and the start time of the system, when the fire was located. (x, y, z - Fire coordinates) The variable d calculates the distance in blocks from the player to the fire. (0 to 4)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would suggest trying to get the layout of blocks around, then erasing / replacing them. I know this would not work at all, but that is all the heck I have. ( I left a comment on your PMC post btw, I go by many names xD )

I wish I could think of something, but

 

Have you tried looking into what water does when it comes into contact with fire? That would seem like another logical place to check. I guess you could also try placing a block of water that disappears again... Hey, you asked for suggestions xD

 

Also, I do believe that blowing on a fire makes it burn stronger... I would consider that if I were you! Still a great mod idea though...

I am Mew. The Legendary Psychic. I behave oddly and am always playing practical jokes.

 

I have also found that I really love making extremely long and extremely but sometimes not so descriptive variables. Sort of like what I just did there xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've looked into the code, but found the same code as I tried below. I think I found the source of the error. The change has been submitted to the client, but not for the server, so for the server, the fire still exists. That means I need to send a Packet55BlockDestroy to server, but it needs to come expected. I tried it out but it always came unexpected. Any suggestions?

 

PacketDispatcher.sendPacketToServer(new Packet55BlockDestroy(player.entityId, x, y, z, 15));

^ Code until now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've looked into the code, but found the same code as I tried below. I think I found the source of the error. The change has been submitted to the client, but not for the server, so for the server, the fire still exists. That means I need to send a Packet55BlockDestroy to server, but it needs to come expected. I tried it out but it always came unexpected. Any suggestions?

 

PacketDispatcher.sendPacketToServer(new Packet55BlockDestroy(player.entityId, x, y, z, 15));

^ Code until now

 

That makes so much sense :/ Why didn't I think of that? *facepalms* of course it's client side, you are working with the clients microphone for crying out loud! xD So yes, that seems to be the case doesn't it. I am looking into it now. Expand on unexpected please? I am pushing the limits of my awakens right now.

I am Mew. The Legendary Psychic. I behave oddly and am always playing practical jokes.

 

I have also found that I really love making extremely long and extremely but sometimes not so descriptive variables. Sort of like what I just did there xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes so much sense :/ Why didn't I think of that? *facepalms* of course it's client side, you are working with the clients microphone for crying out loud! xD So yes, that seems to be the case doesn't it. I am looking into it now. Expand on unexpected please? I am pushing the limits of my awakens right now.

 

Yeah, I thought of that while I was taking a nap :D Regarding the "unexpected": this screen pops up.

 

M8saKmS.png

 

Most likely the server found out that this might be something suspicious, like cheating, so I must find a way to tell the server that this is not a cheat.

 

€dit:

 

I found a more appropriate method, but it doesn't really do what I want. Nevertheless, it doesn't raise the "unexpected screen".

 

mc.thePlayer.sendQueue.handleBlockDestroy(new Packet55BlockDestroy(mc.thePlayer.entityId, x, y, z, i));

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That to me seems like you have no channel set up... I am not sure if you need it but.. Well, may as well try xD

I am Mew. The Legendary Psychic. I behave oddly and am always playing practical jokes.

 

I have also found that I really love making extremely long and extremely but sometimes not so descriptive variables. Sort of like what I just did there xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeaaaah, I have a channel set up and a packet handler, but the packet handler is pretty useless, because I don't want to recieve packets. I just want to send a packet ... or do I need to recieve this packet in some way? As I looked in the tutorial, it seemed pretty useless for my mod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well... I have no clue then xD Well, have fun. There is a bed with my name on it :S

 

I need some sleep... Ill sleep on it xD

I am Mew. The Legendary Psychic. I behave oddly and am always playing practical jokes.

 

I have also found that I really love making extremely long and extremely but sometimes not so descriptive variables. Sort of like what I just did there xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I need to send a custom packet. I found some interesting methods in the sendQueue of the EntityClientPlayerMP (mc.thePlayer).

 

mc.thePlayer.sendQueue.addToSendQueue(new Packet55BlockDestroy(mc.thePlayer.entityId, x, y, z, 15));
mc.thePlayer.sendQueue.handleBlockDig(new Packet14BlockDig(2, x, y, z, 1));

 

They both don't work, or am I missing something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wish I knew :/

 

 

I would agree with GotoLink, but the fact of the matter is that you still have to tell the server that a block w

 

Actually, wouldn't the block break packet be sent from the server to the client? Because the WorldGen and block location stuff is all stored server side, the client just displays that information. That is probably why the first packet is not working. You are sending the packet from the client, back to the client again.

I am Mew. The Legendary Psychic. I behave oddly and am always playing practical jokes.

 

I have also found that I really love making extremely long and extremely but sometimes not so descriptive variables. Sort of like what I just did there xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Mew: I've been having the same issue with the packet handlers where if I try to send a custom packet from the client, it comes back to the client and not to the server... Any idea on why it's doing this and how to fix it? It's so very frustrating!

 

Are you sure it's not making it to the server? Its quite hard ( for me anyway ) to determine wether or not the packet has gone through...

I am Mew. The Legendary Psychic. I behave oddly and am always playing practical jokes.

 

I have also found that I really love making extremely long and extremely but sometimes not so descriptive variables. Sort of like what I just did there xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, the Packet14BlockDig worked in some way. You were able to see this "destroying progress" in the fire (you know, these cracks). Regarding the BlockBreakPacket, you were right. I think I'm thinking too difficult. I know I need to send the fitting packet to the server to make the server recognize that there's no fire anymore, but I won't be able to make this with a custom packet, or am I? I'm a bit confused right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. No. and.... No.

 

You are wanting the SERVER to tell the CLIENT that the fire has disappeared, so you want to have the BlockBreakPacket executed on the server and have the results sent to the client. So yes, I think you may need your own packets because you have to let the server know that the microphone is being blown and how strong etc. Then, in a handler that is server side, do the checks to see if the microphone has been blown enough to put out the fire and send the packet. So I am thinking you will only need one packet, but I may be wrong.

I am Mew. The Legendary Psychic. I behave oddly and am always playing practical jokes.

 

I have also found that I really love making extremely long and extremely but sometimes not so descriptive variables. Sort of like what I just did there xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Mew: I've been having the same issue with the packet handlers where if I try to send a custom packet from the client, it comes back to the client and not to the server... Any idea on why it's doing this and how to fix it? It's so very frustrating!

 

Are you sure it's not making it to the server? Its quite hard ( for me anyway ) to determine wether or not the packet has gone through...

 

I'm also finding it quite difficult to do so :P

 

I've tried a few ways:

 

 

public class PacketHandler implements IPacketHandler {
@Override
public void onPacketData(INetworkManager manager, Packet250CustomPayload packet, Player player) {
	if (packet.channel.equals("MyPacket")) {
		this.handleMyPacket(packet);
	}
}

@SideOnly(Side.SERVER)
public void handleMyPacket(Packet250CustomPayload packet) {
	Side effectiveSide = FMLCommonHandler.instance().getEffectiveSide();
	Side side = FMLCommonHandler.instance().getSide();
	Boolean isClient = Minecraft.getMinecraft().theWorld.isRemote;
	// actual code here
}

 

 

Unless I comment out the

@SideOnly

annotation, the game crashes with a NoMethodFound error, indicating that the packet is being handled client-side.

side

and

isClient

get set to

Side.CLIENT

and

true

respectively, which would mean that the code is server-side, while

effectiveSide

is

Side.SERVER

, indicating that the code is being handled client-side. I'm most inclined to believe the SideOnly annotation and the value of

world.isRemote

, especially since the latter should have failed if it were running server side (well, the

Minecraft.getMinecraft()

part)

I like to make mods, just like you. Here's one worth checking out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try using diesieben07's advanced packet handling tutorial. It works like a charm for me. After being explained what packets do, I now see so many errors that I have had in my mods before xD

 

Here is the tutorial http://www.minecraftforge.net/wiki/Advanced_Packet_Handling

I am Mew. The Legendary Psychic. I behave oddly and am always playing practical jokes.

 

I have also found that I really love making extremely long and extremely but sometimes not so descriptive variables. Sort of like what I just did there xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, just finished implementing their packet handler, but the exact same thing happens. See my GitHub repo for the code...

 

PS: I feel like I'm taking over OP's thread... I have my own I created recently. But then again, this _is_ relevant (at least, I _think_ OP and I are having the same problem here...). Should we discuss there or here? :P

I like to make mods, just like you. Here's one worth checking out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well... I have no idea. Could I see some of your code? Especially the code that is related to the sending of the packet, the packet, and the any data associated with the packet.

I am Mew. The Legendary Psychic. I behave oddly and am always playing practical jokes.

 

I have also found that I really love making extremely long and extremely but sometimes not so descriptive variables. Sort of like what I just did there xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Relevant code: PacketHandler.java (code is pretty much copy-paste from the tutorial here), SDPacket.java (once again, no changes other than the name), OutgoingWormholePacket.java (the same as TestPacket but with different data), and finally BlockStargateController.java line 129 (sends the custom packet from the client side with some test data)

 

If it matters, I'm using 1.6.2 but I assumed that's what you assumed :)

I like to make mods, just like you. Here's one worth checking out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Relevant code: PacketHandler.java (code is pretty much copy-paste from the tutorial here), SDPacket.java (once again, no changes other than the name), OutgoingWormholePacket.java (the same as TestPacket but with different data), and finally BlockStargateController.java line 129 (sends the custom packet from the client side with some test data)

 

If it matters, I'm using 1.6.2 but I assumed that's what you assumed :)

 

Why are you doing all that queue stuff? You just need to go OutgoingWormholePacket packet = new OutgoingWormholePacket(params); packet.makePacket(); and you should be good :/

I am Mew. The Legendary Psychic. I behave oddly and am always playing practical jokes.

 

I have also found that I really love making extremely long and extremely but sometimes not so descriptive variables. Sort of like what I just did there xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm developing a dimension, but it's kinda resource intensive so some times during player teleporting it lags behind making the player phase down into the void, so im trying to implement some kind of pregeneration to force the game loading a small set of chunks in the are the player will teleport to. Some of the things i've tried like using ServerLevel and ServerChunkCache methods like getChunk() dont actually trigger chunk generation if the chunk isn't already on persistent storage (already generated) or placing tickets, but that doesn't work either. Ideally i should be able to check when the task has ended too. I've peeked around some pregen engines, but they're too complex for my current understanding of the system of which I have just a basic understanding (how ServerLevel ,ServerChunkCache  and ChunkMap work) of. Any tips or other classes I should be looking into to understand how to do this correctly?
    • https://mclo.gs/4UC49Ao
    • Way back in the Forge 1.17 days, work started for adding JPMS (Java Platform Module Support) to ModLauncher and ForgeModLoader. This has been used internally by Forge and some libraries for a while now, but mods (those with mods.toml specifically) have not been able to take advantage of it. As of Forge 1.21.1 and 1.21.3, this is now possible!   What is JPMS and what does it mean for modders? JPMS is the Java Platform Module System, introduced in Java 9. It allows you to define modules, which are collections of packages and resources that can be exported or hidden from other modules. This allows for much more fine-tuned control over visibility, cleaner syntax for service declarations and support for sealed types across packages. For example, you might have a mod with a module called `com.example.mod` that exports `com.example.mod.api` and `com.example.mod.impl` to other mods, but hides `com.example.mod.internal` from them. This would allow you to have a clean API for other mods to use, while keeping your internal implementation details hidden from IDE hints, helping prevent accidental usage of internals that might break without prior notice. This is particularly useful if you'd like to use public records with module-private constructors or partially module-private record components, as you can create a sealed interface that only your record implements, having the interface be exported and the record hidden. It's also nice for declaring and using services, as you'll get compile-time errors from the Java compiler for typos and the like, rather than deferring to runtime errors. In more advanced cases, you can also have public methods that are only accessible to specific other modules -- handy if you want internal interactions between multiple of your own mods.   How do I bypass it? We understand there may be drama in implementing a system that prevents mods from accessing each other's internals when necessary (like when a mod is abandoned or you need to fix a compat issue) -- after all, we are already modding a game that doesn't have explicit support for Java mods yet. We have already thought of this and are offering APIs from day one to selectively bypass module restrictions. Let me be clear: Forge mods are not required to use JPMS. If you don't want to use it, you don't have to. The default behaviour is to have fully open, fully exported automatic modules. In Java, you can use the `Add-Opens` and `Add-Exports` manifest attributes to selectively bypass module restrictions of other mods at launch time, and we've added explicit support for these when loading your Forge mods. At compile-time, you can use existing solutions such as the extra-java-module-info Gradle plugin to deal with non-modular dependencies and add extra opens and exports to other modules. Here's an example on how to make the internal package `com.example.examplemod.internal` open to your mod in your build.gradle: tasks.named('jar', Jar) { manifest { attributes([ 'Add-Opens' : 'com.example.examplemod/com.example.examplemod.internal' 'Specification-Title' : mod_id, 'Specification-Vendor' : mod_authors // (...) ]) } } With the above in your mod's jar manifest, you can now reflectively access the classes inside that internal package. Multiple entries are separated with a space, as per Java's official spec. You can also use Add-Exports to directly call without reflection, however you'd need to use the Gradle plugin mentioned earlier to be able to compile. The syntax for Add-Exports is the same as Add-Opens, and instructions for the compile-time step with the Gradle plugin are detailed later in this post. Remember to prefer the opens and exports keywords inside module-info.java for sources you control. The Add-Opens/Add-Exports attributes are only intended for forcing open other mods.   What else is new with module support? Previously, the runtime module name was always forced to the first mod ID in your `mods.toml` file and all packages were forced fully open and exported. Module names are now distinguished from mod IDs, meaning the module name in your module-info.java can be different from the mod ID in your `mods.toml`. This allows you to have a more descriptive module name that doesn't have to be the same as your mod ID, however we strongly recommend including your mod ID as part of your module name to aid troubleshooting. The `Automatic-Module-Name` manifest attribute is now also honoured, allowing you to specify a module name for your mod without needing to create a `module-info.java` file. This is particularly useful for mods that don't care about JPMS features but want to have a more descriptive module name and easier integration with other mods that do use JPMS.   How do I use it? The first step is to create a `module-info.java` file in your mod's source directory. This file should be in the same package as your main mod class, and should look something like this: open module com.example.examplemod { requires net.minecraftforge.eventbus; requires net.minecraftforge.fmlcore; requires net.minecraftforge.forge; requires net.minecraftforge.javafmlmod; requires net.minecraftforge.mergetool.api; requires org.slf4j; requires logging; } For now, we're leaving the whole module open to reflection, which is a good starting point. When we know we want to close something off, we can remove the open modifier from the module and open or export individual packages instead. Remember that you need to be open to Forge (module name net.minecraftforge.forge), otherwise it can't call your mod's constructor. Next is fixing modules in Gradle. While Forge and Java support modules properly, Gradle does not put automatic modules on the module path by default, meaning that the logging module (from com.mojang:logging) is not found. To fix this, add the Gradle plugin and add a compile-time module definition for that Mojang library: plugins { // (...) id 'org.gradlex.extra-java-module-info' version "1.9" } // (...) extraJavaModuleInfo { failOnMissingModuleInfo = false automaticModule("com.mojang:logging", "logging") } The automatic module override specified in your build.gradle should match the runtime one to avoid errors. You can do the same for any library or mod dependency that is missing either a module-info or explicit Automatic-Module-Name, however be aware that you may need to update your mod once said library adds one. That's all you need to get started with module support in your mods. You can learn more about modules and how to use them at dev.java.
    • Faire la mise à jour grâce à ce lien m'a aider personnellement, merci à @Paint_Ninja. https://www.amd.com/en/support 
    • When I came across the 'Exit Code: I got a 1 error in my Minecraft mods, so I decided to figure out what was wrong. First, I took a look at the logs. In the mods folder (usually where you'd find logs or crash reports), I found the latest.log file or the corresponding crash report. I read it through carefully, looking for any lines with errors or warnings. Then I checked the Minecraft Forge support site, where you can often find info on what causes errors and how to fix them. I then disabled half of my mods and tried running the game. If the error disappeared, it meant that the problem was with the disabled mod. I repeated this several times to find the problem mod.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.