Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello guys.

 

I have one problem. There is a mod for Minecraft 1.7.2 and the problem is that I want to downgrade it to 1.6.4, because its easier to downgrade it instead of working with the buggy 1.6.4 source and because of many guys from the community want a 1.6.4 version. (well it takes not so much time...) Oh and aswell, its allowed from the mod creators.

 

So my problem: In Minecraft Forge 1.7.2 there is a class called "net.minecraftforge.common.util.Constants". https://github.com/MinecraftForge/MinecraftForge/blob/master/src/main/java/net/minecraftforge/common/util/Constants.java

I want now to know if such a class exits in 1.6.4 and if not what must I change here?

 

    @Override
    public void readFromNBT(NBTTagCompound nbtTagCompound)
    {
        super.readFromNBT(nbtTagCompound);
        this.cityName = nbtTagCompound.getString("cityName");
        NBTTagList nbtTagOwnersList = nbtTagCompound.getTagList("owners", Constants.NBT.TAG_COMPOUND);
        this.owners = new ArrayList<UUID>();
        for(int i = 0; i < nbtTagOwnersList.tagCount(); i++)
        {
            NBTTagCompound nbtTagOwnersCompound = nbtTagOwnersList.getCompoundTagAt(i);
            UUID uuid = UUID.fromString(nbtTagOwnersCompound.getString("owner"));
            owners.add(i, uuid);
            System.out.println("UUID Size = " + this.owners.size());
            System.out.println("UUID name = " + this.owners.get(i).toString());
        }
    }

Oh and is it right that I must change "UUID" to EntityPlayer?

 

Bektor

Developer of Primeval Forest.

Posted

I know it's easier but UUID? Wtf is that? What are you trying to do?

Read up on the newest updates by Mojang. Players are no longer identified by their username, but by a UUID (google it if you don't know what it is -.-), to ultimately support changing your username.

 

@OP: The Constants class is not present in 1.6.4 yet, because it's not technically needed. Only in 1.7 take NBTTagLists their component type.

With UUIDs, yes, use usernames for that in 1.6.

Ok, thanks. But which class must I use for the usernames? I think its EntityPlayer, but I'm not 100% sure and so I want not to test it out, because if it isn't EntityPlayer then I have to change a log of code.

Oh and how must then this line look like?

NBTTagList nbtTagOwnersList = nbtTagCompound.getTagList("owners", Constants.NBT.TAG_COMPOUND);

Must I only remove the "Constants.NBT.TAG_COMPOUND" or must I replace it with something different or change it? And if yes, in what must I change this line?

Developer of Primeval Forest.

Posted

Ok, I found some other things that are different from 1.7 to 1.6.

 

So how must look like this code in 1.6?

    @Override
    public void readFromNBT(NBTTagCompound nbtTagCompound)
    {
        super.readFromNBT(nbtTagCompound);
        this.cityName = nbtTagCompound.getString("cityName");
        NBTTagList nbtTagOwnersList = nbtTagCompound.getTagList("owners", Constants.NBT.TAG_COMPOUND);
        this.owners = new ArrayList<UUID>();
        for(int i = 0; i < nbtTagOwnersList.tagCount(); i++)
        {
            NBTTagCompound nbtTagOwnersCompound = nbtTagOwnersList.getCompoundTagAt(i);
            UUID uuid = UUID.fromString(nbtTagOwnersCompound.getString("owner"));
            owners.add(i, uuid);
            System.out.println("UUID Size = " + this.owners.size());
            System.out.println("UUID name = " + this.owners.get(i).toString());
        }
    }

 

I hope that you guys can help me!

Bektor

Developer of Primeval Forest.

Posted

I won't give you fully working code, you need to do some work yourself. UUIDs are Strings in 1.6 (containing the username). And for getTagList you can just remove the 2nd parameter.

Ok, but what is with "getCompoundTagAt"?

NBTTagCompound nbtTagOwnersCompound = nbtTagOwnersList.getCompoundTagAt(i);

Developer of Primeval Forest.

Posted

The method name probably changed. Search "getTag" or similar.

Well I searched already but I dindn't find a method that do the same thing, only methods for 1.7 but nothing for 1.6.

Developer of Primeval Forest.

Posted

Please, use your brain. It's called

tagAt

in 1.6.

Ok, thanks. Well now I don't get an error after I changed some more lines that gaves me an error after I used

tagAt

.

I hope that this will work, because I can't test it, because there I need to add many many other lines...

 

"Old" code: (1.7.2)

    @Override
    public void readFromNBT(NBTTagCompound nbtTagCompound)
    {
        super.readFromNBT(nbtTagCompound);
        this.cityName = nbtTagCompound.getString("cityName");
        NBTTagList nbtTagOwnersList = nbtTagCompound.getTagList("owners", Constants.NBT.TAG_COMPOUND);
        this.owners = new ArrayList<UUID>();
        for(int i = 0; i < nbtTagOwnersList.tagCount(); i++)
        {
            NBTTagCompound nbtTagOwnersCompound = nbtTagOwnersList.getCompoundTagAt(i);
            UUID uuid = UUID.fromString(nbtTagOwnersCompound.getString("owner"));
            owners.add(i, uuid);
            System.out.println("UUID Size = " + this.owners.size());
            System.out.println("UUID name = " + this.owners.get(i).toString());
        }
    }

Changed code: (1.6.4)

    
@Override
    public void readFromNBT(NBTTagCompound nbtTagCompound)
    {
        super.readFromNBT(nbtTagCompound);
        this.cityName = nbtTagCompound.getString("cityName");
        NBTTagList nbtTagOwnersList = nbtTagCompound.getTagList("owners");
        this.owners = new ArrayList<UUID>();
        for(int i = 0; i < nbtTagOwnersList.tagCount(); i++)
        {
            NBTBase nbtTagOwnersCompound = nbtTagOwnersList.tagAt(i);
            UUID uuid = UUID.fromString(((NBTTagCompound) nbtTagOwnersCompound).getString("owner"));
            owners.add(i, uuid);
            System.out.println("UUID Size = " + this.owners.size());
            System.out.println("UUID name = " + this.owners.get(i).toString());
        }
    }

 

Developer of Primeval Forest.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • @Tsuk1 Also, new note, you can use blockbench to make the custom item model for when it is not on the head.   EDIT: Funny story, I am making a mod similar to yours! Mine is called NorseMC.
    • @Nood_dev Could you send a screenshot of your weapon code? Here is the one I made (for a dagger): The specific UUID does not matter, just that it is the same every time, which is why UUID#randomUUID does not work public class DaggerItem extends TieredItem implements Vanishable { protected static final double REACH_MODIFIER = -1.5D; protected final Multimap<Attribute, AttributeModifier> defaultModifiers; protected final UUID BASE_ATTACK_REACH_UUID = UUID.fromString("6fe75b5c-9d1b-4e83-9eea-a1d5a94e8dd5") public DaggerItem(Tier pTier, int pAttackDamageModifier, float pAttackSpeedModifier, Properties pProperties) { super(pTier, pAttackDamageModifier, pAttackSpeedModifier, pProperties); this.attackDamage = (float) pAttackDamageModifier + pTier.getAttackDamageBonus(); ImmutableMultimap.Builder<Attribute, AttributeModifier> builder = ImmutableMultimap.builder(); builder.put(Attributes.ATTACK_DAMAGE, new AttributeModifier(BASE_ATTACK_DAMAGE_UUID, "Weapon modifier", this.attackDamage, AttributeModifier.Operation.ADDITION)); builder.put(Attributes.ATTACK_SPEED, new AttributeModifier(BASE_ATTACK_SPEED_UUID, "Weapon modifier", pAttackSpeedModifier, AttributeModifier.Operation.ADDITION)); // THE ONE YOU WANT: builder.put(ForgeMod.ENTITY_REACH.get(), new AttributeModifier(BASE_ATTACK_REACH_UUID, "Weapon modifier", REACH_MODIFIER, AttributeModifier.Operation.ADDITION)); this.defaultModifiers = builder.build(); } @Override public Multimap<Attribute, AttributeModifier> getDefaultAttributeModifiers(EquipmentSlot pEquipmentSlot) { return pEquipmentSlot == EquipmentSlot.MAINHAND ? this.defaultModifiers : super.getDefaultAttributeModifiers(pEquipmentSlot); } }
    • https://images.app.goo.gl/1PxFKdxByTgkxvSu6
    • That's what we'll try out. I could never figure out how to recreate the crash, so I'll just have to wait and see.
    • Ok, I updated to the latest version and now the models are visible, the problem now is that the glowing eyes are not rendered nor any texture I render there when using shaders, even using the default Minecraft eyes RenderType, I use entityTranslucent and entityCutout, but it still won't render. Something I noticed when using shaders is that a texture, instead of appearing at the world position, would appear somewhere on the screen, following a curved path, it was strange, I haven't been able to reproduce it again. I thought it could be that since I render the texture in the AFTER ENTITIES stage which is posted after the batches used for entity rendering are finished, maybe that was the reason why the render types were not being drawn correctly, so I tried injecting code before finishing the batches but it still didn't work, plus the model was invisible when using shaders, there was a bug where if I look at the model from above it is visible but if I look at it from below it is invisible. So in summary, models are now visible but glowing eyes and textures are not rendered, that hasn't changed.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.