Jump to content

General question, sending packets with variable number of pars.


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey,

I am working on probably the most difficult part of my orders system - customization of orders.

After choosing own customization in gui, packets have to be send.

 

I made write and readBytes methods using sth like: int...args

 

Method returns object(my task) with set parameters.

With packets table is send with ints customization numbers(each task customization I will make as an int value)

 

public Object getTaskWithParameters(int id, int...args)
{		
	switch(id)
	{
		case 1:
			task = new EntityAIStayHere(villager, [u]some args[/u]);
		case 2:
			task = new EntityAIStay(villager, [u]some args[/u]);
	}

	return task;		
}

 

Is that way of setting pars for object is good or I should try sth else?

Should I continue working on my code or its only waste of time??

 

Posted

In my eyes - it's perfectly fine.

 

Note: Use some abstract AI class instead of object and generalize methods - there must be SOME methods (like execute()) that would exist for all AI tasks. Makes things easier. :)

Also note: you will need some instanceof checks and stuff, to not overload AI with arguments. (Unless you are certain that args received will never be too much/few).

 

If you'd create abstraction, you couls put there abstract method load and write NBT.

Then inside packet you could simply call load and write, where write would be done on server to serialize data, and then on clisnt read would read that data and construct AI task.

  Quote

1.7.10 is no longer supported by forge, you are on your own.

Posted

I use Object, some methods cant work with general ai class(its abstract)

Object classes are only for a while, they are converted into their oryginal classes.

I think that instanceof checks and stuff also arent needed, my refreshing orders packet clears all orders and than sets it again(for me easier)

Thanks for confirmating that code should work. So far the code works fine, orders can be added with out crash. I only need to make some order with customization to find out is my code realy working.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • inicie un mundo donde instale Croptopia y Farmer's Delight, entonces instale el addon Croptopia Delight pero no funciona. es la version 1.18.2
    • Hello all. I'm currently grappling with the updateShape method in a custom class extending Block.  My code currently looks like this: The conditionals in CheckState are there to switch blockstate properties, which is working fine, as it functions correctly every time in getStateForPlacement.  The problem I'm running into is that when I update a state, the blocks seem to call CheckState with the position of the block which was changed updated last.  If I build a wall I can see the same change propagate across. My question thus is this: is updateShape sending its return to the neighbouring block?  Is each block not independently executing the updateShape method, thus inserting its own current position?  The first statement appears to be true, and the second false (each block is not independently executing the method). I have tried to fix this by saving the block's own position to a variable myPos at inception, and then feeding this in as CheckState(myPos) but this causes a worse outcome, where all blocks take the update of the first modified block, rather than just their neighbour.  This raises more questions than it answers, obviously: how is a different instance's variable propagating here?  I also tried changing it so that CheckState did not take a BlockPos, but had myPos built into the body - same problem. I have previously looked at neighbourUpdate and onNeighbourUpdate, but could not find a way to get this to work at all.  One post on here about updatePostPlacement and other methods has proven itself long superceded.  All other sources on the net seem to be out of date. Many thanks in advance for any help you might offer me, it's been several days now of trying to get this work and several weeks of generally trying to get round this roadblock.  - Sandermall
    • sorry, I might be stupid, but how do I open it? because the only options I have are too X out, copy it, which doesn't work and send crash report, which doesn't show it to me, also, sorry for taking so long.
    • Can you reproduce this with version 55.0.21? A whole lot of plant placement issues were just fixed in this PR.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.