Jump to content

General question, sending packets with variable number of pars.


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey,

I am working on probably the most difficult part of my orders system - customization of orders.

After choosing own customization in gui, packets have to be send.

 

I made write and readBytes methods using sth like: int...args

 

Method returns object(my task) with set parameters.

With packets table is send with ints customization numbers(each task customization I will make as an int value)

 

public Object getTaskWithParameters(int id, int...args)
{		
	switch(id)
	{
		case 1:
			task = new EntityAIStayHere(villager, [u]some args[/u]);
		case 2:
			task = new EntityAIStay(villager, [u]some args[/u]);
	}

	return task;		
}

 

Is that way of setting pars for object is good or I should try sth else?

Should I continue working on my code or its only waste of time??

 

Posted

In my eyes - it's perfectly fine.

 

Note: Use some abstract AI class instead of object and generalize methods - there must be SOME methods (like execute()) that would exist for all AI tasks. Makes things easier. :)

Also note: you will need some instanceof checks and stuff, to not overload AI with arguments. (Unless you are certain that args received will never be too much/few).

 

If you'd create abstraction, you couls put there abstract method load and write NBT.

Then inside packet you could simply call load and write, where write would be done on server to serialize data, and then on clisnt read would read that data and construct AI task.

1.7.10 is no longer supported by forge, you are on your own.

Posted

I use Object, some methods cant work with general ai class(its abstract)

Object classes are only for a while, they are converted into their oryginal classes.

I think that instanceof checks and stuff also arent needed, my refreshing orders packet clears all orders and than sets it again(for me easier)

Thanks for confirmating that code should work. So far the code works fine, orders can be added with out crash. I only need to make some order with customization to find out is my code realy working.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Different problem now. https://paste.ee/p/iDo8lS35
    • I would like to have a BoP sapling drop from my block if it is also installed. I think I have done everything and I cannot pinpoint the problem, which is the error in the logs that appears when joining a world:   [Worker-Main-11/ERROR] [ne.mi.co.ForgeHooks/]: Couldn't parse element loot_tables:grasses:blocks/leaves_block com.google.gson.JsonSyntaxException: Expected name to be an item, was unknown string 'biomesoplenty:magic_sapling' My code:   LootItemConditions.CONDITIONS.register(modEventBus); public class LootItemConditions { public static final DeferredRegister<LootItemConditionType> CONDITIONS = DeferredRegister.create(Registries.LOOT_CONDITION_TYPE, Grasses.MOD_ID); public static final RegistryObject<LootItemConditionType> IS_MOD_LOADED = CONDITIONS.register("is_mod_loaded", () -> new LootItemConditionType(new IsModLoaded.ConditionSerializer())); } public class IsModLoaded implements LootItemCondition { private final boolean exists; private final String modID; public IsModLoaded(String modID) { this.exists = ModList.get().isLoaded(modID); this.modID = modID; } @Override public LootItemConditionType getType() { return LootItemConditions.IS_MOD_LOADED.get(); } @Override public boolean test(LootContext context) { return this.exists; } public static LootItemCondition.Builder builder(String modid) { return () -> new IsModLoaded(modid); } public static class ConditionSerializer implements Serializer<IsModLoaded> { @Override public void serialize(JsonObject json, IsModLoaded instance, JsonSerializationContext ctx) { json.addProperty("modid", instance.modID); } @Override public IsModLoaded deserialize(JsonObject json, JsonDeserializationContext ctx) { return new IsModLoaded(GsonHelper.getAsString(json, "modid")); } } } protected LootTable.Builder createLeavesDropsWithModIDCheck(Block selfBlock, Item sapling, Property<?>[] properties, String modIDToCheck, float... chances) { CopyBlockState.Builder blockStateCopyBuilder = CopyBlockState.copyState(selfBlock); for(Property<?> property : properties) { blockStateCopyBuilder.copy(property); } return LootTable.lootTable() .withPool(LootPool.lootPool().setRolls(ConstantValue.exactly(1.0F)) .add(LootItem.lootTableItem(selfBlock) .when(HAS_SHEARS_OR_SILK_TOUCH) .apply(blockStateCopyBuilder))) .withPool(LootPool.lootPool().setRolls(ConstantValue.exactly(1.0F)) .add(this.applyExplosionCondition(selfBlock, LootItem.lootTableItem(sapling)) .when(IsModLoaded.builder(modIDToCheck))) .when(BonusLevelTableCondition.bonusLevelFlatChance(Enchantments.BLOCK_FORTUNE, chances)) .when(HAS_NO_SHEARS_OR_SILK_TOUCH)) .withPool(LootPool.lootPool().name("sticks").setRolls(ConstantValue.exactly(1.0F)) .add(this.applyExplosionDecay(selfBlock, LootItem.lootTableItem(Items.STICK). apply(SetItemCountFunction.setCount(UniformGenerator.between(1.0F, 2.0F)))) .when(BonusLevelTableCondition.bonusLevelFlatChance(Enchantments.BLOCK_FORTUNE, NORMAL_LEAVES_STICK_CHANCES)) .when(HAS_NO_SHEARS_OR_SILK_TOUCH))); } I don't know. Am I making a mistake somewhere? Am I forgetting something? Should there be something else?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.