Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Outlook email to a Google Doc?  


Jimm68
 Share

Recommended Posts

You could convert your email to a .doc file and then upload it as a Google doc on your drive. For this you will need a utility that can handle Outook email if available in PST and if you want to directly convert from the email account to Doc without saving it first as PST then a webmail converter. CoolUtils actually has both Total Outlook Converter and Total Webmail Converter. https://www.coolutils.com/TotalWebMailConverterthey offer a trial before needing to buy a license.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 years later...

You're looking for a person with an active email address based on only a name and an organization? In our experience, we know precisely what you need. To discover types of prospects what you're searching for in a matter of minutes, utilize our Getprospect email finding tool - https://getprospect.com/blog/8-b2b-prospecting-strategies-for-faster-sales . Your search for the perfect partner is made much easier by professional services like Getprospect!

Edited by IvoryHoward
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • In 1.16, LootModifierManager#deserializeModifier read: private IGlobalLootModifier deserializeModifier(ResourceLocation location, JsonElement element) { if (!element.isJsonObject()) return null; JsonObject object = element.getAsJsonObject(); ILootCondition[] lootConditions = GSON_INSTANCE.fromJson(object.get("conditions"), ILootCondition[].class); // For backward compatibility with the initial implementation, fall back to using the location as the type. // TODO: Remove fallback in 1.16 ResourceLocation serializer = location; if (object.has("type")) { serializer = new ResourceLocation(JSONUtils.getAsString(object, "type")); } return ForgeRegistries.LOOT_MODIFIER_SERIALIZERS.getValue(serializer).read(location, object, lootConditions); } Note the if(object.has(type")){} block, which is lacking from the 1.18 version of the class: private IGlobalLootModifier deserializeModifier(ResourceLocation location, JsonElement element) { if (!element.isJsonObject()) return null; JsonObject object = element.getAsJsonObject(); LootItemCondition[] lootConditions = GSON_INSTANCE.fromJson(object.get("conditions"), LootItemCondition[].class); ResourceLocation serializer = new ResourceLocation(GsonHelper.getAsString(object, "type")); return ForgeRegistries.LOOT_MODIFIER_SERIALIZERS.getValue(serializer).read(location, object, lootConditions); } So, the "value" tag is required now for loot modifiers... fine. I added this to my loot modifer json files when I kept getting NullPointerExceptions. But when I use a valid "value" tag I get: [15:27:02] [Render thread/ERROR]: Couldn't parse loot modifier examplemod:add_structure_loot java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "net.minecraftforge.common.loot.GlobalLootModifierSerializer.read(net.minecraft.resources.ResourceLocation, com.google.gson.JsonObject, net.minecraft.world.level.storage.loot.predicates.LootItemCondition[])" because the return value of "net.minecraftforge.registries.IForgeRegistry.getValue(net.minecraft.resources.ResourceLocation)" is null at net.minecraftforge.common.loot.LootModifierManager.deserializeModifier(LootModifierManager.java:133) ~[forge-1.18-38.0.14_mapped_official_1.18-recomp.jar%2376%2382!:?] at net.minecraftforge.common.loot.LootModifierManager.lambda$apply$0(LootModifierManager.java:115) ~[forge-1.18-38.0.14_mapped_official_1.18-recomp.jar%2376%2382!:?] at java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1511) ~[?:?] at net.minecraftforge.common.loot.LootModifierManager.apply(LootModifierManager.java:113) ~[forge-1.18-38.0.14_mapped_official_1.18-recomp.jar%2376%2382!:?] at net.minecraftforge.common.loot.LootModifierManager.apply(LootModifierManager.java:54) ~[forge-1.18-38.0.14_mapped_official_1.18-recomp.jar%2376%2382!:?] My json file is: { "type": "chest", "conditions": [ { "condition": "forge:loot_table_id", "loot_table_id": "examplemod:chests/modstructure" } ] } I tried printing the contents of ForgeRegistries.LOOT_MODIFIER_SERIALIZERS to know which keys I can use, but got: [15:26:13] [modloading-worker-0/INFO]: Printing LOOT_MODIFER_SERIALIZERS [15:26:13] [modloading-worker-0/INFO]: Printed LOOT_MODIFER_SERIALIZERS Is this a bug, given 1.18 is new, or am I not using these classes right?
    • https://forge.gemwire.uk/wiki/Capabilities#Attaching_a_Capability do the same thing but with LevelChunk
    • Yeah never figured that one out. Going to look into that a little deeper now.
    • So I just need to attach my code (I posted above) to chunks?
    • Capabilities all work the same regardless of their attached type (except ItemStack ones which are a little special).
  • Topics

  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.