Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello!

As title, I have an idea about "EntityBurnBySunlightEvent", which is triggered when entities like zombies, skeletons, and phantoms tries to burn under sunlight.

I also noticed they are hard coded into each of their own

livingTick()

which means if the event is added, I will either trigger the event in every entity class that burns, or add a method in LivingEntity (since not every entity that burns are MonsterEntity). For example:

public void setBurnBySunlight(int ticks)
{
    ticks = ...EntityBurnBySunlightEvent(this, ticks);
    this.setFire(ticks);
}

call this, instead of directly call setFire() in their livingTick()

 

The EntityBurnBySunlightEvent will have two parameters: (LivingEntity) and (Ticks to burn), and will be located in 

net.minecraftforge.event.entity.living.LivingEvent

The user can modify the ticks that the entity given is going to burn, which allows the user to set it to 0 in order to prevent the burning of entity from happening.

This will be helpful for people that wants to cancel the burn update from the sunlight, by not affecting the burn effect from other sources.

Any suggestions for this? Thanks :)

Edited by poopoodice
Posted

Isn't this already handled by LivingDamageEvent in some capacity? All you are doing is negating fire damage on the specific entity. My issues is that it's called every frame which would be already handled in some capacity by LivingUpdateEvent. Technically, I could just check if the entity is on fire and if it's daylight during this event and remove the fire effect. This negates the whole purpose of creating this event as otherwise it's just more processing time for the calls to go through synchronously.

Also, if the event were to be called, it would be handled by ZombieEntity#shouldBurnInDay or an extra condition in PhantomEntity#livingTick for example.

Posted (edited)

The problem is that will remove the fire effect even if the effect is not caused by the sunlight.

 

The purpose of this event is to allow user to modify the duration of the effect caused by the sunlight, and not to remove it as the source of the fire can be lava, enchantments, flint and steel...etc.

And if like you said if you check it in the LivingUpdateEvent, and manually put out the fire if the entity is in daylight, they can literally swim in lava, or walk on fire without getting burned, which is not desired.

Thanks for the reply.
 

Edited by poopoodice
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "I want to understand how complex mods with ASM transformation and coremods work, such as Xray or AntiXray. Why do they break when you simply rename packages? What features of their architecture make refactoring difficult? And what techniques are used to protect these mods? I am interested in technical aspects in order to better understand the bytecode and Forge loader system."
    • I can't figure out if you're looking for help trying to steal someone elses work, or cheat at the game....
    • Title: Why Is It So Hard to Rename and Restructure Mods Like Xray or AntiXray? 🤔 Post text: Hey everyone! I’ve been digging into Minecraft modding for a while and have one big question that I can’t figure out on my own. Maybe someone with more experience could help or give me some advice. Here’s the issue: When I take a “normal” Minecraft mod — for example, one that just adds some blocks or new items — I can easily change its structure, package names, or even rebrand it entirely. It’s straightforward. But as soon as I try this with cheat-type mods like XrayMod or AntiXray, everything falls apart. Even if I just rename the classes, refactor the packages, or hide its identity somehow, the mod either breaks or stops working properly. XrayMod in particular is proving to be a nightmare to modify without losing its core function. So my question is — why is this so much harder with cheat mods like Xray? Is there something fundamentally different about how they’re coded, loaded, or protected that prevents simple renaming or restructuring? And if so, how can I actually learn to understand someone else’s cheat mod enough to safely refactor it without breaking the core features? I’ve already been spending over two months trying to figure this out and haven’t gotten anywhere. It feels like there must be some trick or knowledge I’m missing. Would really appreciate any thoughts, tips, or references — maybe there are guides or techniques for understanding cheat-mod internals? Or if you’ve successfully “disguised” a cheat mod like Xray before, I’d love to hear how you did it. Thanks in advance for any help or discussion. ✌️
    • just started making cinamatic contect check it out on my channel or check out my facebook page    Humbug City Minecraft Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2N6OveKwno https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61575866982337  
    • Where did you get the schematic? Source/Link? And do use an own modpack or a pre-configured from curseforge? If yes, which one On a later time, I can make some tests on my own - but I need the schematic and the modpack name
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.