Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have quite a complex capability, with some collections. I thought that it would be too troublesome to create network messages for every operation I make, so I instead used the storage class to serialize the whole capability class and send it to the client. I then added some methods on the capability class to replace the references in the fields with the ones from the deserialized class. The performance loss is insignificant, as I will rarely be using it.

Is there anything I should be concerned about? 

Posted (edited)

You should only send the data which has changed.
You could create a message that uses a Collection as parameter,
if you then change the data of a collection, you can send this message with the new Collection to the client

Note: you also need a parameter that defies which Collection is to be synchronized on the Client (a String or an int are recommended)

Edited by Luis_ST
Posted
14 minutes ago, Luis_ST said:

You should only send the data which has changed.
You could create a message that uses a Collection as parameter,
if you then change the data of a collection, you can send this message with the new Collection to the client

Note: you also need a parameter that defies which Collection is to be synchronized on the Client (a String or an int are recommended)

By collections, I mean maps of lists and such. Syncing will be a pain. If there is no immediate issue other than a little performance loss, I will just keep it like that until i do a refactoring and cleanup session on the code.

Posted
5 minutes ago, matthew123 said:

By collections, I mean maps of lists and such.

then you need to create two messaages, also Lists are an instance of Collection

5 minutes ago, matthew123 said:

If there is no immediate issue other than a little performance loss

if you don't sync the data very often, that shouldn't be a problem

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.