Jump to content

Questions About Death Causes


AdamIzAmazin

Recommended Posts

The mod I am making requires it to be able to detect if a player was killed by another player, and if so, who. I've been all over EntityLivingBase, DamageSource, and a few others. Maybe I'm looking straight at what I need to be looking at, or maybe I'm not looking in the right places. Either way, I would greatly appreciate if someone could help solve my issue. Thank you.

 

-Adam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have a look at net.minecraftforge.event.entity.living.LivingDeathEvent, and net.minecraft.util.EntityDamageSource. On a LivingDeathEvent, you could check if the entity is an instance of EntityPlayer, and if the DamageSource is of the type in DamageSource.causePlayerDamage

 

I hope that this helped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried what I could with the information given, but I was still only able to detect that the player had died, not that the player had died to another player which is something I had been able to do before. I think you sent me on the right track though. I think that, like you said, Inside LivingDeathEntity, if I could see if the entity that caused my death was another player besides me than that would work, but I am still learning so it would be very much appreciated if you could go a bit ,more in depth as to how to do this. Still not sure how to detect the name  of the killer so if you have any ideas on that you would make me a very happy person! Thanks for being the only one that tried to help!

 

-Adam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing, last night I found attackingPlayer in EntityLivingBase and I tried doing a test to see if that did what I wanted it to. Since I do almost all of my tests in the chat bow (I find that way the easiest), I did likewise with this. All I did was put this into EntityClientPlayerMP:

 

    	if (par1Str.equals("player"))
    	{
    		mc.thePlayer.addChatMessage(EntityLivingBase.attackingPlayer);
                return;
    	}

 

This gave me an error with two quick fixes, either to make attackingPlayer static or create getters and setters for it. At first I chose static, but in multiplayer (and singleplayer, duh) whenever I would type "player" it would only output "null" whether I hit, got hit, or did nothing. I assumed this was because of me making attackingPlayer static since I've had similar problems making things like that static. So I looked up getters and setters and then created this right below attackingPlayer:

 

    public EntityPlayer getAttackingPlayer()
    {
    	return this.attackingPlayer;
    }

 

However, this still required me to make both of them static which I decided got me nowhere. I have no idea if I'm even close to the answer for this one, and even when I do solve it, it still wont solve the whole issue of detecting if the player died to another player; it just gets me closer. Thank you for not getting annoyed with my pestering!

 

-Adam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I thought I found something, in EntityLivingBase I found:

 

                    if (entity instanceof EntityPlayer)
                    {
                        this.recentlyHit = 100;
                        this.attackingPlayer = (EntityPlayer)entity;
                    }

 

I thought that this might be triggered (and maybe it is) when a you die to a player, so I changed it to this:

 

                    if (entity instanceof EntityPlayer)
                    {
                        this.recentlyHit = 100;
                        this.attackingPlayer = (EntityPlayer)entity;
                        VengenceMode.wasPlayer = true;  
                    }

 

Did my chat tests, is still always false. :/ This seems like it HAS to be the spot. Especially since it says this.attackingPlayer = (EntityPlayer)entity; Can anyone confirm that this is the correct location, and if so, can you tell me what I'm doing wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This gave me an error with two quick fixes, either to make attackingPlayer static or create getters and setters for it.

Sorry, but this sounds like another 'learn Java before you're going to mod' case. Or at least learn the basics (so you can advance whilst modding). And knowing (and recognizing) the difference between object and static references is essential to this basics.

Author of PneumaticCraft, MineChess, Minesweeper Mod and Sokoban Mod. Visit www.minemaarten.com to take a look at them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This gave me an error with two quick fixes, either to make attackingPlayer static or create getters and setters for it.

Sorry, but this sounds like another 'learn Java before you're going to mod' case. Or at least learn the basics (so you can advance whilst modding). And knowing (and recognizing) the difference between object and static references is essential to this basics.

 

Okay, I guess I do have a bit of reading to do. I was hoping that I could just play it by ear. Oh well, thanks anyways.

 

-Adam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm developing a dimension, but it's kinda resource intensive so some times during player teleporting it lags behind making the player phase down into the void, so im trying to implement some kind of pregeneration to force the game loading a small set of chunks in the are the player will teleport to. Some of the things i've tried like using ServerLevel and ServerChunkCache methods like getChunk() dont actually trigger chunk generation if the chunk isn't already on persistent storage (already generated) or placing tickets, but that doesn't work either. Ideally i should be able to check when the task has ended too. I've peeked around some pregen engines, but they're too complex for my current understanding of the system of which I have just a basic understanding (how ServerLevel ,ServerChunkCache  and ChunkMap work) of. Any tips or other classes I should be looking into to understand how to do this correctly?
    • https://mclo.gs/4UC49Ao
    • Way back in the Forge 1.17 days, work started for adding JPMS (Java Platform Module Support) to ModLauncher and ForgeModLoader. This has been used internally by Forge and some libraries for a while now, but mods (those with mods.toml specifically) have not been able to take advantage of it. As of Forge 1.21.1 and 1.21.3, this is now possible!   What is JPMS and what does it mean for modders? JPMS is the Java Platform Module System, introduced in Java 9. It allows you to define modules, which are collections of packages and resources that can be exported or hidden from other modules. This allows for much more fine-tuned control over visibility, cleaner syntax for service declarations and support for sealed types across packages. For example, you might have a mod with a module called `com.example.mod` that exports `com.example.mod.api` and `com.example.mod.impl` to other mods, but hides `com.example.mod.internal` from them. This would allow you to have a clean API for other mods to use, while keeping your internal implementation details hidden from IDE hints, helping prevent accidental usage of internals that might break without prior notice. This is particularly useful if you'd like to use public records with module-private constructors or partially module-private record components, as you can create a sealed interface that only your record implements, having the interface be exported and the record hidden. It's also nice for declaring and using services, as you'll get compile-time errors from the Java compiler for typos and the like, rather than deferring to runtime errors. In more advanced cases, you can also have public methods that are only accessible to specific other modules -- handy if you want internal interactions between multiple of your own mods.   How do I bypass it? We understand there may be drama in implementing a system that prevents mods from accessing each other's internals when necessary (like when a mod is abandoned or you need to fix a compat issue) -- after all, we are already modding a game that doesn't have explicit support for Java mods yet. We have already thought of this and are offering APIs from day one to selectively bypass module restrictions. Let me be clear: Forge mods are not required to use JPMS. If you don't want to use it, you don't have to. The default behaviour is to have fully open, fully exported automatic modules. In Java, you can use the `Add-Opens` and `Add-Exports` manifest attributes to selectively bypass module restrictions of other mods at launch time, and we've added explicit support for these when loading your Forge mods. At compile-time, you can use existing solutions such as the extra-java-module-info Gradle plugin to deal with non-modular dependencies and add extra opens and exports to other modules. Here's an example on how to make the internal package `com.example.examplemod.internal` open to your mod in your build.gradle: tasks.named('jar', Jar) { manifest { attributes([ 'Add-Opens' : 'com.example.examplemod/com.example.examplemod.internal' 'Specification-Title' : mod_id, 'Specification-Vendor' : mod_authors // (...) ]) } } With the above in your mod's jar manifest, you can now reflectively access the classes inside that internal package. Multiple entries are separated with a space, as per Java's official spec. You can also use Add-Exports to directly call without reflection, however you'd need to use the Gradle plugin mentioned earlier to be able to compile. The syntax for Add-Exports is the same as Add-Opens, and instructions for the compile-time step with the Gradle plugin are detailed later in this post. Remember to prefer the opens and exports keywords inside module-info.java for sources you control. The Add-Opens/Add-Exports attributes are only intended for forcing open other mods.   What else is new with module support? Previously, the runtime module name was always forced to the first mod ID in your `mods.toml` file and all packages were forced fully open and exported. Module names are now distinguished from mod IDs, meaning the module name in your module-info.java can be different from the mod ID in your `mods.toml`. This allows you to have a more descriptive module name that doesn't have to be the same as your mod ID, however we strongly recommend including your mod ID as part of your module name to aid troubleshooting. The `Automatic-Module-Name` manifest attribute is now also honoured, allowing you to specify a module name for your mod without needing to create a `module-info.java` file. This is particularly useful for mods that don't care about JPMS features but want to have a more descriptive module name and easier integration with other mods that do use JPMS.   How do I use it? The first step is to create a `module-info.java` file in your mod's source directory. This file should be in the same package as your main mod class, and should look something like this: open module com.example.examplemod { requires net.minecraftforge.eventbus; requires net.minecraftforge.fmlcore; requires net.minecraftforge.forge; requires net.minecraftforge.javafmlmod; requires net.minecraftforge.mergetool.api; requires org.slf4j; requires logging; } For now, we're leaving the whole module open to reflection, which is a good starting point. When we know we want to close something off, we can remove the open modifier from the module and open or export individual packages instead. Remember that you need to be open to Forge (module name net.minecraftforge.forge), otherwise it can't call your mod's constructor. Next is fixing modules in Gradle. While Forge and Java support modules properly, Gradle does not put automatic modules on the module path by default, meaning that the logging module (from com.mojang:logging) is not found. To fix this, add the Gradle plugin and add a compile-time module definition for that Mojang library: plugins { // (...) id 'org.gradlex.extra-java-module-info' version "1.9" } // (...) extraJavaModuleInfo { failOnMissingModuleInfo = false automaticModule("com.mojang:logging", "logging") } The automatic module override specified in your build.gradle should match the runtime one to avoid errors. You can do the same for any library or mod dependency that is missing either a module-info or explicit Automatic-Module-Name, however be aware that you may need to update your mod once said library adds one. That's all you need to get started with module support in your mods. You can learn more about modules and how to use them at dev.java.
    • Faire la mise à jour grâce à ce lien m'a aider personnellement, merci à @Paint_Ninja. https://www.amd.com/en/support 
    • When I came across the 'Exit Code: I got a 1 error in my Minecraft mods, so I decided to figure out what was wrong. First, I took a look at the logs. In the mods folder (usually where you'd find logs or crash reports), I found the latest.log file or the corresponding crash report. I read it through carefully, looking for any lines with errors or warnings. Then I checked the Minecraft Forge support site, where you can often find info on what causes errors and how to fix them. I then disabled half of my mods and tried running the game. If the error disappeared, it meant that the problem was with the disabled mod. I repeated this several times to find the problem mod.
  • Topics

  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.