Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I'm looking for the best way to add an item to existing chest loot tables without completely overwriting them, through an existing method (preferable) or from an event handler if necessary.

Thanks in advance.

Edited by CrackedScreen
Marking thread as solved
Posted

Wrote the following code and passed the serializer through a deferred register:

public class ModLoot extends LootModifier {

    protected ModLoot(LootItemCondition[] conditionsIn) {
        super(conditionsIn);
    }

    @NotNull
    @Override
    protected List<ItemStack> doApply(List<ItemStack> generatedLoot, LootContext context) {
        generatedLoot.add(new ItemStack(Items.NETHERITE_SCRAP));
        return generatedLoot;
    }

    public static class ModLootSerializer extends GlobalLootModifierSerializer<ModLoot> {

        @Override
        public ModLoot read(ResourceLocation location, JsonObject object, LootItemCondition[] ailootcondition) {
            return new ModLoot(ailootcondition);
        }

        @Override
        public JsonObject write(ModLoot instance) {
                return new JsonObject();
        }
    }
}

Assuming any of this even works in the first place, what would a reliable way to test if the netherite scrap appears in loot chests? Currently using a seed which contains a broken nether portal next to spawn, but the contents are the same across recreating the world.

Posted
42 minutes ago, CrackedScreen said:

random number generator?

handle it in the way you want, there is no recommended way

if you want you can add the final values to your json files of your LootModifier,
then it would be possible to change the values simply by the user or other Mods via a data pack

Posted
{
  "type": "loot_test:mod_loot",
  "conditions": [
    {
      "condition": "forge:loot_table_id",
      "loot_table_id": "minecraft:chests/ruined_portal"
    }
  ],
  "min": 1,
  "max": 3,
  "chance": 0.5
}

Do loot table files currently support multiple conditions (such as adding modded loot in ruined_portal and nether_bridge loot) or will a new file need to be created and serialized for this?

Posted (edited)

I cannot swap the type to minecraft:alternatives since the type field is used by the loot table serializer. If you have an example of an OR condition I could use for the json in my previous post that would work best. I'm specifically looking to change the condition so that loot will be added to multiple loot chest types instead of only "ruined_portal".

Edited by CrackedScreen
Posted
{
  "type": "loot_test:mod_loot",
  "conditions": [
      {
        "condition": "minecraft:alternative",
          "terms": [
          {
            "condition": "forge:loot_table_id",
            "loot_table_id": "minecraft:chests/ruined_portal"
          },
          {
            "condition": "forge:loot_table_id",
            "loot_table_id": "minecraft:chests/nether_bridge"
          }
        ]
      }
  ],
  "min": 1,
  "max": 3,
  "chance": 0.5
}

This works. Marking the thread as solved.

  • CrackedScreen changed the title to [1.18.2] [SOLVED] Adding modded items to existing vanilla loot tables

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I’m working on a Manta Ray entity in MCreator using GeckoLib animations, and my goal is to have a looping (flip) animation that ends at −360°, then transitions seamlessly into a swim animation starting at 0°. However, every method I’ve tried—like quickly interpolating the angle, inserting a brief keyframe at 0°, or using a micro “bridge” animation—still causes a visible “flash” https://imgur.com/a/5ucjUb9 or "jump" when the rotation resets. I want a perfectly smooth motion from the flip’s final rotation to the swim’s initial rotation. If anyone has solved this in MCreator/GeckoLib, or found a better trick for handling the −360° →0° gap without a snap, I’d appreciate some advice ! P.S.- I cannot set swim to start at -360 because I would have the same issue but in reverse. Here's the custom LoopingAnimationGoal :   class LoopingAnimationGoal extends Goal { private final MantaRayEntity entity; private final int cooldownTime; private int animationTimer; private int cooldownTimer; // New boolean to prevent double calls private boolean isLoopingActive = false; public LoopingAnimationGoal(MantaRayEntity entity, int cooldownTime) { this.entity = entity; this.cooldownTime = cooldownTime; this.animationTimer = 0; this.cooldownTimer = 0; this.setFlags(EnumSet.of(Flag.MOVE, Flag.LOOK)); } @Override public boolean canUse() { System.out.println("[DEBUG] LoopingGoal canUse => cooldownTimer=" + cooldownTimer); if (cooldownTimer > 0) { cooldownTimer--; return false; } BlockPos entityPos = entity.blockPosition(); boolean canUse = entity.isWaterAbove(entityPos, 4); System.out.println("[DEBUG] LoopingGoal canUse => WATER " + (canUse ? "DETECTED" : "NOT DETECTED") + " at " + entityPos + ", returning " + canUse); return canUse; } @Override public void start() { entity.setAnimation("looping"); animationTimer = 63; isLoopingActive = true; System.out.println("[DEBUG] Looping animation STARTED. Timer=" + animationTimer + ", gameTime=" + entity.level().getGameTime()); } @Override public boolean canContinueToUse() { System.out.println("[DEBUG] LoopingGoal canContinueToUse => animationTimer=" + animationTimer); return animationTimer > 0; } @Override public void tick() { animationTimer--; System.out.println("[DEBUG] LoopingGoal TICK => animationTimer=" + animationTimer); // We stop ONLY if we are still looping if (animationTimer <= 0 && isLoopingActive) { System.out.println("[DEBUG] condition => animationTimer <= 0 && isLoopingActive"); stop(); } } @Override public void stop() { // Check if already stopped if (!isLoopingActive) { System.out.println("[DEBUG] stop() called again, but isLoopingActive = false. Doing nothing."); return; } System.out.println("[DEBUG] Looping STOP at tick=" + entity.level().getGameTime() + ", last known rotation=" + entity.getXRot() + "/" + entity.getYRot() + ", animationTimer=" + animationTimer); // Immediately switch to "swim" entity.setAnimation("swim"); // Reset cooldown cooldownTimer = cooldownTime; // Disable looping to prevent a second stop isLoopingActive = false; System.out.println("[DEBUG] Looping STOP => setAnimation('swim'), cooldownTimer=" + cooldownTimer); } }  
    • So is the intention of the crusher for ores meant to be used with a silk touch pickaxe or something? Cause that seems like too much effort just to profit off of the machine, when everything drops as raw materials now. Am I just missing something? 
    • Update your AMD/ATI drivers - get the drivers from their website - do not update via system  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.