Jump to content

ObfuscationReflectionHelper in 1.18.2


Syric

Recommended Posts

I'm porting a mod someone else wrote to 1.18.2. It increases mob caps. It does this using something called ObfuscationReflectionHelper, which I unfortunately have no experience with, and which seems to have been removed for 1.18.

How can I replicate the following code in 1.18.2 and beyond?

(I've already updated a few things, like changing EntityClassification to MobCategory.)

	private void setup(final FMLCommonSetupEvent event) {
		
//		for (EntityClassification classification : EntityClassification.values()) {
//			LOGGER.error(String.format("%s: %d", classification.getName(), classification.getMaxNumberOfCreature()));
//		}
		
		try {
			Field mobCap = ObfuscationReflectionHelper.findField(MobCategory.class, "field_75606_e");
			mobCap.setAccessible(true);
			
			Field modifierField = Field.class.getDeclaredField("modifiers");
			modifierField.setAccessible(true);
			modifierField.setInt(mobCap, mobCap.getModifiers() & ~Modifier.FINAL);
			
			mobCap.setInt(MobCategory.MONSTER, Config.MONSTER_CAP.get());
			mobCap.setInt(MobCategory.CREATURE, Config.CREATURE_CAP.get());
			mobCap.setInt(MobCategory.AMBIENT, Config.AMBIENT_CAP.get());
			mobCap.setInt(MobCategory.WATER_CREATURE, Config.WATER_CREATURE_CAP.get());
			mobCap.setInt(MobCategory.WATER_AMBIENT, Config.WATER_AMBIENT_CAP.get());
		} catch (NoSuchFieldException | IllegalAccessException e) {
			e.printStackTrace();
		}
		
//		for (EntityClassification classification : EntityClassification.values()) {
//			LOGGER.error(String.format("%s: %d", classification.getName(), classification.getMaxNumberOfCreature()));
//		}
		
	}

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Syric said:

I'm porting a mod someone else wrote to 1.18.2. It increases mob caps. It does this using something called ObfuscationReflectionHelper, which I unfortunately have no experience with, and which seems to have been removed for 1.18.

ObfuscationReflectionHelper still exists, though not in the same location.

15 hours ago, Syric said:

How can I replicate the following code in 1.18.2 and beyond?

The same way as in the previous version, only with the class and srg field name updated. Though, you should be enqueueing that through #enqueueWork as the operation is not thread-safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.