mjhotdog Posted February 21, 2014 Share Posted February 21, 2014 Which is the best way to play sounds that will be sustained for a machine for a long time, e.g., a sawmill sound? sndHandler.playSound(ISound) lets me turn the sound on (for as long as I want with automatic repeat) and off when I desire. Very cool, but takes _a lot_ of other code. worldObj.playSoundEffect(x,y,z,"soundname",volume,pitch) is super-easy, but it has to keep being called over and over to play the sound in a sustained way, and yet turn off when I desire. Which way is most likely to lag the system if I have a dozen machines running in close proximity to one another? Is either one significantly more efficient than the other for playing sustained effects that need to be turned off at will? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SanAndreaP Posted February 21, 2014 Share Posted February 21, 2014 The best way to find that out is to test it for yourself. Quote Don't ask for support per PM! They'll get ignored! | If a post helped you, click the "Thank You" button at the top right corner of said post! | mah twitter This thread makes me sad because people just post copy-paste-ready code when it's obvious that the OP has little to no programming experience. This is not how learning works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GotoLink Posted February 21, 2014 Share Posted February 21, 2014 In your sounds.json, you should be able to set the sound as a stream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjhotdog Posted February 22, 2014 Author Share Posted February 22, 2014 Does someone know whether sndHandler.playSound() is more or less efficient for repeating a short sound file for a long period of time compared to worldObj.playSoundEffect()? (Or would it be better to have a single long sound file repeating the sound?) I have tried each way of producing sound, and they sound fine, but I would like to move on to other parts of my mod, and if someone has already determined this, I would like to avoid having to do extensive testing of this myself. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.