Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why, Mojang, would you add something like this, when Java already knows how to test for class inheritance?

// Searching for entities that implement a given interface:
List entities = world.getEntitiesWithinAABB(SomeInterface.class, player.getEntityBoundingBox().expand(radius, (double) radius / 2.0D, radius));

// Oh joy...
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Don't know how to search for interface test.entity.SomeInterface
at net.minecraft.util.ClassInheritanceMultiMap.func_180212_a(ClassInheritanceMultiMap.java:53) ~[ClassInheritanceMultiMap.class:?]
at net.minecraft.util.ClassInheritanceMultiMap$1.iterator(ClassInheritanceMultiMap.java:111) ~[ClassInheritanceMultiMap$1.class:?]
at net.minecraft.world.chunk.Chunk.getEntitiesOfTypeWithinAAAB(Chunk.java:1103) ~[Chunk.class:?]
at net.minecraft.world.World.getEntitiesWithinAABB(World.java:3289) ~[World.class:?]
at net.minecraft.world.World.getEntitiesWithinAABB(World.java:3272) ~[World.class:?]

This kind of code worked perfectly fine before.

 

I'm baffled about how to use the ClassInheritanceMultiMap class; it has a public 'add(Class)' method that is never called from anywhere, and no instance of the class is ever instantiated except for within the Chunk class, and that seems to only be used to contain a list of entity classes currently in the chunk.

 

The method func_180212_a relies on Apache commons ClassUtils to return the class hierarchy; do we now have to register all of our custom classes / interfaces somehow in order for them to be recognized? What the hell is going on here?

Posted

Yeah, I could see that's what it was doing, but I couldn't believe it so I had to ask. I mean, I suppose they are saving some CPU cycles, but wtf. Surely there are other areas that would improve performance more than this.

 

Is there any way to add an interface to the mappings? Does that need to be done on a chunk-by-chunk basis as entities of that type enter the chunk, or can it be added once and be done with it?

 

Worst case scenario is to simply write a custom method specifically for interfaces that uses standard Java instanceof comparisons on all entities found within the given area.

Posted

Most impressive, as always ;)

 

I'd say 'submit this as a bug to Mojang', but that's a lost cause. Last time I submitted a bug with an equally simple fix, it was for 1.7.2, and they dallied around the issue for 6 months and then "Oh, well it's no longer an issue because 1.8 is out now and doesn't suffer from it". Yeah, but you could have f-ing fixed it in 30 seconds 6 months ago, and then neither 1.7.2 or 1.7.10 would suffer from it either!!! Argh.

 

Anyway, I wrote a simple helper method to use in the meantime, nothing fancy:

/**
* Returns a list of all entities within the given bounding box that match the class or interface provided
*/
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public static <T> List<T> getEntitiesWithinAABB(World world, Class<T> clazz, AxisAlignedBB aabb) {
List<Entity> entities = world.getEntitiesWithinAABB(Entity.class, aabb);
List<T> found = Lists.newArrayList();
Iterator<Entity> iterator = entities.iterator();
while (iterator.hasNext()) {
	Entity e = iterator.next();
	if (clazz.isAssignableFrom(e.getClass())) {
		found.add((T) e);
	}
}
return found;
}

As you can see, I just piggy-backed on the vanilla method, since it's so fast and furious, to get a base list of Entities, then cherry-pick any that match the interface (or any class) out of that.

 

It could probably be optimized better, but I didn't want to waste any more time when there is still so much of my mod that needs updating.

Posted
I'd say 'submit this as a bug to Mojang', but that's a lost cause. Last time I submitted a bug with an equally simple fix, it was for 1.7.2, and they dallied around the issue for 6 months and then "Oh, well it's no longer an issue because 1.8 is out now and doesn't suffer from it". Yeah, but you could have f-ing fixed it in 30 seconds 6 months ago, and then neither 1.7.2 or 1.7.10 would suffer from it either!!! Argh.

 

Or close it because it's a mod problem.  Like maps not functioning correctly in dimensions above 127.

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello , when I try to launch the forge installer it just crash with a message for 0,5 secondes. I'm using java 17 to launch it. Here's the link of the error :https://cdn.corenexis.com/view/?img=d/ma24/qs7u4U.jpg  
    • You will find the crash-report or log in your minecraft directory (crash-report or logs folder)
    • Use a modpack which is using these 2 mods as working base:   https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/modpacks/life-in-the-village-3
    • inicie un mundo donde instale Croptopia y Farmer's Delight, entonces instale el addon Croptopia Delight pero no funciona. es la version 1.18.2
    • Hello all. I'm currently grappling with the updateShape method in a custom class extending Block.  My code currently looks like this: The conditionals in CheckState are there to switch blockstate properties, which is working fine, as it functions correctly every time in getStateForPlacement.  The problem I'm running into is that when I update a state, the blocks seem to call CheckState with the position of the block which was changed updated last.  If I build a wall I can see the same change propagate across. My question thus is this: is updateShape sending its return to the neighbouring block?  Is each block not independently executing the updateShape method, thus inserting its own current position?  The first statement appears to be true, and the second false (each block is not independently executing the method). I have tried to fix this by saving the block's own position to a variable myPos at inception, and then feeding this in as CheckState(myPos) but this causes a worse outcome, where all blocks take the update of the first modified block, rather than just their neighbour.  This raises more questions than it answers, obviously: how is a different instance's variable propagating here?  I also tried changing it so that CheckState did not take a BlockPos, but had myPos built into the body - same problem. I have previously looked at neighbourUpdate and onNeighbourUpdate, but could not find a way to get this to work at all.  One post on here about updatePostPlacement and other methods has proven itself long superceded.  All other sources on the net seem to be out of date. Many thanks in advance for any help you might offer me, it's been several days now of trying to get this work and several weeks of generally trying to get round this roadblock.  - Sandermall
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.