Jump to content

(De)obfuscation / IClassTransformer / production environment


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

 

  i'm trying to deploy a mod into production ( in dev all works )

  The mod uses AspectJ (runtime weaving) for bytecode manipulation

  CoreMod pointing to IClassTransformer and positioned behind DeobfuscationTransformer using IFMLLoadingPlugin.SortingIndex(1011)

 

  The Transformer receives bytecode for transformation(weaving),

  but method/field names are just in the form func_NNNNN_A / field_NNNNN_A ( dumped the class at the end of the transformation chain using legacy.debugClassLoadingSave)

 

 

  a) what to do, to get the method names deobfuscated?

  b) what side effects will it have on the rest of code, bearing in mind that:

    1) asm patches are applied before deobfuscation

    2) rest of the MC/forge/mods code will get same deobf treatment

    3) somwhere in forge i saw even reflection helper/fixer for (de)obf - correct me on this, if need be

  c) if full run-time deobf has no side effects, why is it not turned on

 

any help/tips would be appreciated

 

Thanks

p

Posted

Coremods are heavily discouraged around here.  Sooo....you are unlikely to get any help.

 

That said:

> a) what to do, to get the method names deobfuscated?

> 1) asm patches are applied before deobfuscation

You can't both of these. You're either waiting until after deobf, or you're not.  You can't have both.

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Posted

Fully understand the discouragement, but Core is the only place for bytecode patching, which i have to use.

 

Actually u can have booth, the transformation chain:

takes obfuscated bytecodes,

gives it to ASM patchers (mods seem to provide two sets of patches, one for deobf and one for obf )

patched bytecode is handed to deobfuscation

and then AspectJ patches the bytecode again ( given full deobf ... )

 

the question is if during deobf, mcp remapping can be used instead of srg

Posted

Fully understand the discouragement, but Core is the only place for bytecode patching, which i have to use.

 

The question is "why?"

Nearly everything anyone would want to do can be done without ASM, the rest should be submitted as a pull request to Forge.

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Posted

In most cases I would agree.

 

But unfortunately,  most of the places i need to patch, Forge does not have hooks for.

 

And even if the tables would be turned, me being forge,

considering the request ,

i would decline it, as for most usecases, it would be useless

 

not to mention the patches are intended to be applied on 3rd party mods as well ...

 

Sure one could argue, that 3rd party mods should implement an API,

but seeing the state of modpacking scene ( the slowdown that is added by explicitly implementing interoperability), this approach is much more flexible and expedient and API would be just a fallback option for conflicting situations.

Posted

Using patches via coremod, the mod main code works already surprisingly well,

What I need, is help from coremod folks.

Where / how could i get in touch with them?

 

One could argue, to use second set of patches for obf,

but that would equal to throwing most of the AspectJ advantage out of the window

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I want to create block with entity, that will have height of 3 or more(configurable) and I tried to change first VoxelShape by increasing collision box on height I want and for changing block height on visual side i tried to configure BlockModelBuilder:  base.element() .from(0, 0, 0) .to(16f, 48f, 16f) .face(Direction.UP).texture("#top").end() .face(Direction.DOWN).texture("#bottom").end() .face(Direction.NORTH).texture("#side").end() .face(Direction.SOUTH).texture("#side").end() .face(Direction.WEST).texture("#side").end() .face(Direction.EAST).texture("#side").end() .end(); but, getting crash with next error: Position y out of range, must be within [-16, 32]. Found: %d [48.0]; Looks like game wont to block height modified by more than 32. Is there any way to fix that problem?
    • As long as the packets you are sending aren't lost, there's nothing wrong with what you're currently doing. Although, this sounds like something that would benefit from you making your own datapack registry instead of trying to arbitrarily sync static maps. Check out `DataPackRegistryEvent.NewRegistry`.
    • Hey all, I've been working a lot with datapacks lately, and I'm wondering what the most efficient way to get said data from server to client is.  I'm currently using packets, but given that a lot of the data I'm storing involves maps along the lines of Map<ResourceLocation, CustomDataType>, it can easily start to get messy if I need to transmit a lot of that data all at once. Recently I started looking into the ReloadableServerResources class, which is where Minecraft stores its built-ins.  I see you can access it via the server from the server's resources.managers, and it seems like this can be done even from the client to appropriately retrieve data from the server, unless I'm misunderstanding.  However, from what I can tell, this only works via built-in methods such as getRecipeManager() or getLootTables(), etc.  These are all SimpleJsonResourceReloadListeners, just like my datapack entries are, so it seems like it could be possible for me to access my datapack entries similarly?  But I don't see anywhere in ReloadableServerResources that stores loaded modded entries, so either I'm looking in the wrong place or it doesn't seem to be a thing. Are packets really the best way of doing this, or am I missing a method that would let me use ReloadableServerResources or something similar?
    • Hi, everyone! I'm new to minecraft modding stuff and want ask you some questions. 1. I checked forge references and saw there com.mojang and net.minecraft (not net.minecraftforge) and as I understand it's original game packages with all minecraft logic inside including renderers and so on, right? 2. Does it mean that forge has a limited set of instruments which doesn't cover all the aspects of the game? If make my question more specific then does forge provide such instruments that allow me totally change minecraft itself, like base mechanics and etc.? Or I have to use "original game packages" to implement such things? 3. I actively learning basic concepts with forge documentation and tutorials. So in my plans make different inventory system like in diabloids. Is that possible with forge? 4. It is last question related to the second one. So how deeply I can change minecraft with forge? I guess all my questions above because of that I haven't globally understanding what forge is and how it works inside and how it works with minecraft. It would be great if you provide some links or topics about it or explain it by yourself but I guess it's to big to be explained in that post at once. Anyway, thank you all for any help!
    • Im trying add to block a hole in center, just a usual block and in center of it on up side, there is should be a hole. I tried to add it via BlockModelBuilder, but its not working. Problem is that it only can change block size outside. I tried it to do with VoxelShape and its working, but its has been on server side and looks like its just changed collision shape, but for client, there is a texture covering this hole. I tried to use: base.renderType("cutout"); and removed some pixels from texture. I thought its should work, but game optimization makes block inside looks transparent. So, only custom model?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.