Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Greetings everyone,

I've been trying to code an automatic shooting weapon recently, and encountered a problem.

My weapon uses an NBT integer tag to store the current magazine contents, and should fire as long as the RMB is held and there is ammo in the magazine.

I use this code:

public void onUsingTick(ItemStack stack, EntityLivingBase player, int count)
	{//Every 3rd tick...
		if (count % 3 == 0)
		{//...get the world we are in...
			World world = player.world;
			//...get magazine contents...
			int magCount = stack.getTagCompound().getInteger("magazine");
			//...if the magazine has ammo...
			if (magCount > 0)
			{
				if (!world.isRemote)
				{
                 	//decrease the ammo...
					stack.getTagCompound().setInteger("magazine", magCount - 1);
					//...create and spawn the bullet, play shot sound.
					EntityGenericBullet bullet = new EntityGenericBullet(world, player, 6.0D, 0.5D, false);
					bullet.shoot(player, player.rotationPitch, player.rotationYaw, 5.0F, 1.0F);
					world.spawnEntity(bullet);
					world.playSound(null, player.posX, player.posY, player.posZ, ModSounds.submachinegunfire, SoundCategory.PLAYERS, 6.0F, 1.0F / (itemRand.nextFloat() * 0.2F + 0.8F));				

				}				
				//Small recoil
				player.setLocationAndAngles(player.posX, player.posY, player.posZ, player.rotationYaw, player.rotationPitch - (itemRand.nextFloat() + 1.0F));
			}
		}

	}

And for some reason, it gives a weird bug: sometimes upon a short RMB press, instead of a short burst, the weapon empties the entire magazine. That does not always happen though.

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks in advance,

Dan

Posted

To trace this sort of thing you should use console statements of IDE debugger to trace the execution. For example, with a console statement it would quickly become apparent if the method is being called more than once per tick. The code looks generally correct to me, so I assume that the method is being called mutliple times in your problem case.

  • Like 1

Check out my tutorials here: http://jabelarminecraft.blogspot.com/

Posted
12 hours ago, jabelar said:

To trace this sort of thing you should use console statements of IDE debugger to trace the execution. For example, with a console statement it would quickly become apparent if the method is being called more than once per tick. The code looks generally correct to me, so I assume that the method is being called mutliple times in your problem case.

OK,

So I added console outputs for onItemRightClick(), onUsingTick() and onPlayerStoppedUsing() and caught a very strange bug:

The onPlayerStoppedUsing is never called.

public void onPlayerStoppedUsing(ItemStack stack, World world, EntityLivingBase entityLiving, int timeLeft)
	{
		if (entityLiving instanceof EntityPlayer)
		{		
			
			System.out.println("Stopped using");
			
			
		}
	}

I never saw it in the console.

Also it looks like it is... unsynchronized? I can't understand why else I could get this kind of messages where it starts firing several times.

[22:11:55] [main/INFO] [STDOUT]: [items.ItemSubmachineGun:onItemRightClick:126]: Starting firing
[22:11:55] [Server thread/INFO] [STDOUT]: [items.ItemSubmachineGun:onItemRightClick:126]: Starting firing
[22:11:55] [Server thread/INFO] [STDOUT]: [items.ItemSubmachineGun:onUsingTick:163]: Shooting @ tick count 72000, 25 ammo left
[22:11:55] [main/INFO] [STDOUT]: [items.ItemSubmachineGun:onItemRightClick:126]: Starting firing
[22:11:55] [Server thread/INFO] [STDOUT]: [items.ItemSubmachineGun:onUsingTick:163]: Shooting @ tick count 71997, 24 ammo left
[22:11:55] [Server thread/INFO] [STDOUT]: [items.ItemSubmachineGun:onItemRightClick:126]: Starting firing
[22:11:55] [Server thread/INFO] [STDOUT]: [items.ItemSubmachineGun:onUsingTick:163]: Shooting @ tick count 71994, 23 ammo left
[22:11:55] [main/INFO] [STDOUT]: [items.ItemSubmachineGun:onItemRightClick:126]: Starting firing
[22:11:55] [Server thread/INFO] [STDOUT]: [items.ItemSubmachineGun:onItemRightClick:126]: Starting firing
[22:11:55] [Server thread/INFO] [STDOUT]: [items.ItemSubmachineGun:onUsingTick:163]: Shooting @ tick count 71991, 22 ammo left
[22:11:55] [Server thread/INFO] [STDOUT]: [items.ItemSubmachineGun:onUsingTick:163]: Shooting @ tick count 71988, 21 ammo left
[22:11:55] [Server thread/INFO] [STDOUT]: [items.ItemSubmachineGun:onUsingTick:163]: Shooting @ tick count 71985, 20 ammo left
[22:11:56] [Server thread/INFO] [STDOUT]: [items.ItemSubmachineGun:onUsingTick:163]: Shooting @ tick count 71982, 19 ammo left
...Firing, firing, firing, although I already let go of the RMB...
...No "Stopped Using" message...

I am sorry for being bothersome, but I just can't understand why onPlayerStoppedUsing() is never called.

Posted

I'm wondering if the logic for things like isHandActive() are getting a bit screwed up for your implementation. If you trace the call hierarchy you find that the Minecraft#proccessKeyBinds() method will only stop the use if the isHandActive() returns true. For example, you should double check your onItemRightClick() and compare with the ItemBow implementation for example to make sure you're properly setting the hand active in the first place.

 

Part of the problem is that an item like yours is sort of a mix between vanilla item behaviors. For example, food consumes the actual item stack and checks the maximum use duration so there is code that checks to see if the item stack becomes empty, but you have a separate concept of ammo. And a bow has a concept of use but only fires once at the end of use. So I suspect that you're not quite handling some piece of the vanilla logic correctly. Maybe it is the active hand stuff. Or maybe the max use duration stuff.

 

The other issue is that NBT isn't automatically synced between sides. It will get synced, but maybe not as quickly as you might need for your logic. So you might want to force the sync by explicitly sending an item update packet.

 

Regarding "synchronization" though I'm not sure what you are concerned about in your console trace you posted. It looks like the client side (MAIN) detects the firing and sends that to the server which then starts firing. There is of course the problem that you should also see the client detect the stopped using, but otherwise it looks normal to me. What did you expect to see?

 

 

  • Like 1

Check out my tutorials here: http://jabelarminecraft.blogspot.com/

Posted

Thank you, I'll try lowering the rate of fire to around 2 per second and see what happens.

So, lowering the rate helped a bit - the unexpected full auto happens around 1 in 5 times now. It also seems to happen almost exclusively after a short click, while click&hold allows for controllable firing.

Also I detected that as long as I hold the RMB, after each shot a re-equipping animation plays. Is that because of the NBT update?

Dan

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Daniel366Cobra said:

Also I detected that as long as I hold the RMB, after each shot a re-equipping animation plays. Is that because of the NBT update?

Yes.

If I recall correctly, there is a method in the Item class called shouldShowEquipAnimation or showReequip or something like that, override that and return false when all that has changed is your NBT data.

Edited by Draco18s
  • Like 1

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • When I first heard about Bitcoin back in 2018, I was skeptical. The idea of a decentralized, digital currency seemed too good to be true. But I was intrigued as I learned more about the technology behind it and its potential. I started small, investing just a few hundred dollars, dipping my toes into the cryptocurrency waters. At first, it was exhilarating to watch the value of my investment grow exponentially. I felt like I was part of the future, an early adopter of this revolutionary new asset. But that euphoria was short-lived. One day, I logged into my digital wallet only to find it empty - my Bitcoin had vanished without a trace. It turned out that the online exchange I had trusted had been hacked, and my funds were stolen. I was devastated, both financially and emotionally. All the potential I had seen in Bitcoin was tainted by the harsh reality that with decentralization came a lack of regulation and oversight. My hard-earned money was gone, lost to the ether of the digital world. This experience taught me a painful lesson about the price of trust in the uncharted territory of cryptocurrency. While the technology holds incredible promise, the risks can be catastrophic if you don't approach it with extreme caution. My Bitcoin investment gamble had failed, and I was left to pick up the pieces, wiser but poorer for having placed my faith in the wrong hands. My sincere appreciation goes to MUYERN TRUST HACKER. You are my hero in recovering my lost funds. Send a direct m a i l ( muyerntrusted ( @ ) mail-me ( . )c o m ) or message on whats app : + 1 ( 4-4-0 ) ( 3 -3 -5 ) ( 0-2-0-5 )
    • You could try posting a log (if there is no log at all, it may be the launcher you are using, the FAQ may have info on how to enable the log) as described in the FAQ, however this will probably need to be reported to/remedied by the mod author.
    • So me and a couple of friends are playing with a shitpost mod pack and one of the mods in the pack is corail tombstone and for some reason there is a problem with it, where on death to fire the player will get kicked out of the server and the tombstone will not spawn basically deleting an entire inventory, it doesn't matter what type of fire it is, whether it's from vanilla fire/lava, or from modded fire like ice&fire/lycanites and it's common enough to where everyone on the server has experienced at least once or twice and it doesn't give any crash log. a solution to this would be much appreciated thank you!
    • It is 1.12.2 - I have no idea if there is a 1.12 pack
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.