Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have had some troubles with blockstates in the past and when you think you got it all, the suddenly a weird bug appears.

I have 2 slabclasses 1 for 16 color blocks and 1 for some stone blocks.

They have both 2 variants. The color slab has HALF and COLOR. The stoneslab class has HALF and VARIANT

 

I had both coded both more or less the way the main issue is in the rendering method here:

for color slab:

@Override
    public void registerModels() {
		
    	if (!isDouble()) {
		Main.proxy.registerItemRenderer(Item.getItemFromBlock(this), 0, "color=white,half=bottom");
		Main.proxy.registerItemRenderer(Item.getItemFromBlock(this), 1, "color=orange,half=bottom");
		Main.proxy.registerItemRenderer(Item.getItemFromBlock(this), 2, "color=magenta,half=bottom");
		Main.proxy.registerItemRenderer(Item.getItemFromBlock(this), 3, "color=light_blue,half=bottom");
		Main.proxy.registerItemRenderer(Item.getItemFromBlock(this), 4, "color=yellow,half=bottom");
		Main.proxy.registerItemRenderer(Item.getItemFromBlock(this), 5, "color=lime,half=bottom");
		Main.proxy.registerItemRenderer(Item.getItemFromBlock(this), 6, "color=pink,half=bottom");
		Main.proxy.registerItemRenderer(Item.getItemFromBlock(this), 7, "color=gray,half=bottom");
    	}
		
	}

and for the stone slab:

    @Override
    public void registerModels() {
		
    	if (!isDouble()) {
		Main.proxy.registerItemRenderer(Item.getItemFromBlock(this), 0, "half=bottom,variant=limestone_raw");
		Main.proxy.registerItemRenderer(Item.getItemFromBlock(this), 1, "half=bottom,variant=marblestone_raw");
		Main.proxy.registerItemRenderer(Item.getItemFromBlock(this), 2, "half=bottom,variant=limestone_cobble");
		Main.proxy.registerItemRenderer(Item.getItemFromBlock(this), 3, "half=bottom,variant=marblestone_cobble");
		Main.proxy.registerItemRenderer(Item.getItemFromBlock(this), 4, "half=bottom,variant=limestone_brick");
		Main.proxy.registerItemRenderer(Item.getItemFromBlock(this), 5, "half=bottom,variant=marblestone_brick");
    	}
		
	}

Now you can see that the color slab has set the "color" variant first and then the "half" variant

The stone class has it vica versa. I had it first in the same order has the color slab class but then i got those errors in the console it can't find an item model. Swapping the variant here solved the problem.

Yet i don't understand why. Here are both blockstate files.

For the terracotta brick slabs (part1):

{
    "forge_marker": 1,
    "defaults": {
        "textures": {
            "top": "#all",
            "bottom": "#all",
            "side": "#all"
        }
    },
    "variants": {
        "half": {
            "bottom": {
                "model": "minecraft:half_slab"
            },
            "top": {
                "model": "minecraft:upper_slab"
            }
        },
        

        "color": {
            "white": {
                "textures": {
                    "all": "tem:blocks/terracotta_white_brick"
                }
            },
            "orange": {
                "textures": {
                    "all": "tem:blocks/terracotta_orange_brick"                    
                }
            },
            "magenta": {
                "textures": {
                    "all": "tem:blocks/terracotta_magenta_brick"
                }
            },
            "light_blue": {
                "textures": {
                    "all": "tem:blocks/terracotta_light_blue_brick"
                }
            },
            "yellow": {
                "textures": {
                    "all": "tem:blocks/terracotta_yellow_brick"
                }
            },
            "lime": {
                "textures": {
                    "all": "tem:blocks/terracotta_lime_brick"
                }
            },
            "pink": {
                "textures": {
                    "all": "tem:blocks/terracotta_pink_brick"
                }
            },
            "gray": {
                "textures": {
                    "all": "tem:blocks/terracotta_gray_brick"
                }
            }
        }
        
    }
}

and here the stoneslabs:

{
    "forge_marker": 1,
    "defaults": {
        "textures": {
            "top": "#all",
            "bottom": "#all",
            "side": "#all"
        }
    },
    "variants": {
        "half": {
            "bottom": {
                "model": "minecraft:half_slab"
            },
            "top": {
                "model": "minecraft:upper_slab"
            }
        },
        

        "variant": {
            "limestone_raw": {
                "textures": {
                    "all": "tem:blocks/limestone_smooth_top"
                }
            },
            "marblestone_raw": {
                "textures": {
                    "all": "tem:blocks/marblestone_smooth_top"                  
                }
            },
            "limestone_cobble": {
                "textures": {
                    "all": "tem:blocks/limestone_cobble"
                }
            },
            "marblestone_cobble": {
                "textures": {
                    "all": "tem:blocks/marblestone_cobble"
                }
            },
            "limestone_brick": {
                "textures": {
                    "all": "tem:blocks/limestone_brick"
                }
            },
            "marblestone_brick": {
                "textures": {
                    "all": "tem:blocks/marblestone_brick"
                }
            }
        }
        
    }
}

 

As you can see the are structured identical

Perhaps there is something i don't see yet.

Posted

Variants in ModelResourceLocations and blockstates files are simply strings (despite Forge's format providing a way to specify per-property behaviours in any order), they need to match exactly. Minecraft always sorts properties in alphabetical order to form variant strings (unless you provide an IStateMapper that does otherwise) and Forge's blockstates format also performs this sorting for the properties you specify.

Please don't PM me to ask for help. Asking your question in a public thread preserves it for people who are having the same problem in the future.

Posted
5 hours ago, winnetrie said:

Aha this alphabetical order does make sense. I didn't think of that. I was wondering why it behaved so illogical. Perhaps i will use IStateMapper.

I used it once before. I had this issue multiple times before and switching the variants place fixed it, but never understood why.

Good to know. Thank you.

 

Using an IStateMapper to change the property order will mean that you can't use Forge's blockstates format to its full extent, you'll need to use fully-specified variants like in the basic Vanilla format.

 

You can also use an IStateMapper to create property strings in the regular format when registering your models, like I do here, here and here.

Please don't PM me to ask for help. Asking your question in a public thread preserves it for people who are having the same problem in the future.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Back then there was a number which determined the tier of an item and block. If the block tier is lower or equal to the item number, the block would be mined. this however, has changed and now it goes by "needs_netherite_tool" which is fine, until you realized that some mods had items and blocks that exceeded these values. You can make you own "needs_mod_tool" but I feel that this is more limiting(and just more work) than before. So is there anyway to use something similar to the old tier system while also still being compatible with a lot of other mod tools?
    • Well, when I log in to the server, sometimes within an hour, sometimes within a minute, the server closes and informs me that there was a Ticking entity error. Below is the crash report
    • This forum is for Forge, not NeoForge. Please go to them for support.
    • Forge version: 55.0.0 Minecraft version: 1.21.5 Downloads: As this is the start of a new version, it is recommended that you check the downloads page and use the latest version to receive any bug fixes. Downloads page Intro: Good evening! Today, we have released our initial build of Forge 55.0 for Minecraft 1.21.5. 1.21.5 is the newest member of the 1.21 family of versions, which was released yesterday on March 25, 2025. As a reminder, the first minor (X.0) of a Forge version is a beta. Forge betas are marked as such on the bottom left of the title screen and are candidates for any breaking changes. Additionally, there are a couple of important things to note about this update, which I've made sure to mention in this post as well. Feel free to chat with us about bugs or these implementation changes on GitHub and in our Discord server. As always, we will continue to keep all versions of 1.21 and 1.20 in active support as covered by our tiered support policy. Cheers, happy modding, and good luck porting! Rendering Refactor For those who tuned in to Minecraft Live on March 22, 2025, you may already know that Mojang have announced their intention to bring their new Vibrant Visuals overhaul to Java in the future. They've taken the first steps toward this by refactoring how rendering pipelines and render types are handled internally. This has, in turn, made many of Forge's rendering APIs that have existed for years obsolete, as they (for the most part) can be done directly in vanilla. If there was a rendering API that was provided by Forge which you believe should be re-implemented, we're happy to discuss on GitHub through an issue or a pull request. Deprecation of weapon-like ToolActions In 1.21.5, Minecraft added new data components for defining the characteristics of weapons in data. This includes attack speed, block tags which define efficient blocks, and more. As such, we will begin marking our ToolActions solution for this as deprecated. ToolActions were originally added to address the problem of creating modded tools that needed to perform the same actions as vanilla tools. There are still a few tool actions that will continue to be used, such as the shears tool action for example. There are some existing Forge tool actions that are currently obsolete and have no effect given the way the new data components are implemented. We will continue to work on these deprecations and invite you to chat with us on GitHub or Discord if you have any questions.
  • Topics

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.