Jump to content

Using to Ore Dictionary for crafting


bigbaddevil6

Recommended Posts

I just got done reading the Tut on Using the Ore Dictionary to add crafting recipes. I did notice that the guide was made for 1.3.2 so could by why I'm having a problem. But if I do what the Tut says about replacing the item with a string that you specified when you register the ingot, it will throw me a Null Pointer in that recipe.

 

This is my registering of the ingot which is before the recipes.

 OreDictionary.registerOre("ingotTitanium", titaniumIngots); 

 

This is the recipe I'm trying to use.

GameRegistry.addRecipe(new ItemStack(mediumPowerCell, 1, mediumPowerCell.getMaxDamage()), new Object[]{"RXR", "XYX", "RXR", 'X', "ingotTitanium", 'Y', largePowerCore, 'R', Item.redstone});

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure that

largePowerCore

is defined?

 

Also, you don't need the

new Object[]{}

bit.  The parameters of the recipes are declared as

object...

, meaning that it already comes in as an array.

 

Oh, I know what the problem is.

 

Here's one of mine

 

GameRegistry.addRecipe(new ShapedOreRecipe(new ItemStack(BlockPedestal.instance,2), "ggg","g g","sss",'g', thinglass, 's', "stone"));

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea i thought that was the case when it came to not needing the new Object[], I was watching a tut when this came up and I kept to it to follow along. My other recipes didn't have it. Yea I overlooked it when I read the description and only glanced at the code layout.

 

By the way I don't see why people would call you an ass. Every time you post to one of my nub questions seem just fine & helpful to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well its common sense that you will need to. I've watched hours of java tuts and still barely get the grasp of what I'm trying to do here. For anyone to think that they can do this without knowing java is idiotic. I thought I've asked some dumb questions. That brings me to a point I was looking over the "How to make an advanced config" and was wondering how it... works meaning I though java wouldn't agree with this.

 

In the PreInit there are these lines.

int randomBlockID = config.getBlock("RandomBlock", 200).getInt();

int randomItemID = config.getItem("RandomItem", 20000).getInt();

        @PreInit
        public void preInit(FMLPreInitializationEvent event) {
                Configuration config = new Configuration(event.getSuggestedConfigurationFile());

                config.load();

                int randomBlockID = config.getBlock("RandomBlock", 200).getInt();

                int randomItemID = config.getItem("RandomItem", 20000).getInt();

                // Since this flag is a boolean, we can read it into the variable directly from the config.
                someConfigFlag = config.get(Configuration.CATEGORY_GENERAL, "SomeConfigFlag", false).getBoolean(false);
                
                //Notice there is nothing that gets the value of this property so the expression results in a Property object.
                Property someProperty = config.get(Configuration.CATEGORY_GENERAL, "SomeConfigString", "nothing");
                
                // Here we add a comment to our new property.
                someProperty.comment = "This value can be read as a string!";
                
                String someConfigString = someProperty.value;
                // this could also be:
                // int someInt = someProperty.getInt();
                // boolean someBoolean = someProperty.getBoolean(true);

                config.save();
        }

 

They then get passed into randomBlock = (new RandomBlock(randomBlockID , 5))

        @Init
        public void load(FMLInitializationEvent event)
        {
                // now the blockID can be set in a configuration file
                randomBlock = (new RandomBlock(randomBlockID , 5))
                                .setHardness(1.5F)
                                .setResistance(10.0F)
                                .setStepSound(Block.soundStoneFootstep)
                                .setBlockName("Random Block");

                // where 20000 is the ItemID I want to assign it, and 2 is the texture.
                randomItem = (new RandomItem(randomItemID, 2));
        }

 

Now to my knowledge wouldn't randomBlockID and randomItemID be local variable to the first function and wouldn't be able to be called in the second function as they are? Also shouldn't the blocks themselves be defined before the preInit like how they are in the postInit.

 

This is the whole code from the http://www.minecraftforge.net/wiki/How_to_make_an_advanced_configuration_file

 

package mod.dummy;

import net.minecraft.src.*;
import cpw.mods.fml.common.*;
import cpw.mods.fml.common.Mod.*;
import cpw.mods.fml.common.event.*;
/* +Other imports */
import net.minecraftforge.common.Configuration;
import net.minecraft.src.forge.Property;

@Mod( modid = "Dummy", name="Dummy", version="1.0")
public class Dummy
{
        @PreInit
        public void preInit(FMLPreInitializationEvent event) {
                Configuration config = new Configuration(event.getSuggestedConfigurationFile());

                config.load();

                int randomBlockID = config.getBlock("RandomBlock", 200).getInt();

                int randomItemID = config.getItem("RandomItem", 20000).getInt();

                // Since this flag is a boolean, we can read it into the variable directly from the config.
                someConfigFlag = config.get(Configuration.CATEGORY_GENERAL, "SomeConfigFlag", false).getBoolean(false);
                
                //Notice there is nothing that gets the value of this property so the expression results in a Property object.
                Property someProperty = config.get(Configuration.CATEGORY_GENERAL, "SomeConfigString", "nothing");
                
                // Here we add a comment to our new property.
                someProperty.comment = "This value can be read as a string!";
                
                String someConfigString = someProperty.value;
                // this could also be:
                // int someInt = someProperty.getInt();
                // boolean someBoolean = someProperty.getBoolean(true);

                config.save();
        }

        @Init
        public void load(FMLInitializationEvent event)
        {
                // now the blockID can be set in a configuration file
                randomBlock = (new RandomBlock(randomBlockID , 5))
                                .setHardness(1.5F)
                                .setResistance(10.0F)
                                .setStepSound(Block.soundStoneFootstep)
                                .setBlockName("Random Block");

                // where 20000 is the ItemID I want to assign it, and 2 is the texture.
                randomItem = (new RandomItem(randomItemID, 2));
        }
        
        @PostInit
        public void postInit(FMLPostInitializationEvent event) {
                
        }

        // These fields save the IDs between function calls
        public static int randomBlockID;
        public static int randomItemID;

        public static Block randomBlock;
        public static Item  randomItem;
        public static boolean someConfigFlag;
}

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Java is funny about all the different scopes and such, huh.

 

There are variables: local, nonlocal, and even other. vis-a-vis:

You can declare variables in several different places:

[*]In a class body as class fields.

Variables declared here are referred to as class-level variables.

[*]As parameters of a method or constructor.

[*]In a method's body or a constructor's body.

[*]Within a statement block, such as inside a while or for block.

 

Then there is the types of class and member variables: static and nonstatic. And visibility: private, public, and [package].

 

Of course, you then have Integer vs int and "string" vs String...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm using Modrinth as a launcher for a forge modpack on 1.20.1, and can't diagnose the issue on the crash log myself. Have tried repairing the Minecraft instillation as well as removing a few mods that have been problematic for me in the past to no avail. Crash log is below, if any further information is necessary let me know. Thank you! https://paste.ee/p/k6xnS
    • Hey folks. I am working on a custom "Mecha" entity (extended from LivingEntity) that the player builds up from blocks that should get modular stats depending on the used blocks. e.g. depending on what will be used for the legs, the entity will have a different jump strength. However, something unexpected is happening when trying to override a few of LivingEntity's functions and using my new own "Mecha" specific fields: instead of their actual instance-specific value, the default value is used (0f for a float, null for an object...) This is especially strange as when executing with the same entity from a point in the code specific to the mecha entity, the correct value is used. Here are some code snippets to better illustrate what I mean: /* The main Mecha class, cut down for brevity */ public class Mecha extends LivingEntity { protected float jumpMultiplier; //somewhere later during the code when spawning the entity, jumpMultiplier is set to something like 1.5f //changing the access to public didn't help @Override //Overridden from LivingEntity, this function is only used in the jumpFromGround() function, used in the aiStep() function, used in the LivingEntity tick() function protected float getJumpPower() { //something is wrong with this function //for some reason I can't correctly access the fields and methods from the instanciated entity when I am in one of those overridden protected functions. this is very annoying LogUtils.getLogger().info(String.valueOf(this.jumpMultiplier))) //will print 0f return this.jumpMultiplier * super.getJumpPower(); } //The code above does not operate properly. Written as is, the entity will not jump, and adding debug logs shows that when executing the code, the value of this.jumpMultiplier is 0f //in contrast, it will be the correct value when done here: @Override public void tick() { super.tick(); //inherited LivingEntity logic //Custom logic LogUtils.getLogger().info(String.valueOf(this.jumpMultiplier))) //will print 1.5f } } My actual code is slightly different, as the jumpMuliplier is stored in another object (so I am calling "this.legModule.getJumpPower()" instead of the float), but even using a simple float exactly like in the code above didn't help. When running my usual code, the object I try to use is found to be null instead, leading to a crash from a nullPointerException. Here is the stacktrace of said crash: The full code can be viewed here. I have found a workaround in the case of jump strength, but have already found the same problem for another parameter I want to do, and I do not understand why the code is behaving as such, and I would very much like to be able to override those methods as intended - they seemed to work just fine like that for vanilla mobs... Any clues as to what may be happening here?
    • Please delete post. Had not noticed the newest edition for 1.20.6 which resolves the issue.
    • https://paste.ee/p/GTgAV Here's my debug log, I'm on 1.18.2 with forge 40.2.4 and I just want to get it to work!! I cant find any mod names in the error part and I would like some help from the pros!! I have 203 mods at the moment.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.