Jump to content

[SOLVED] [1.10.2] World.isRemote bug ?


DBLouis

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

world.isRemote should be set to false in a single player game, right ? Because I'm having an issue here :

 

@SubscribeEvent
public void onWorldLoad(WorldEvent.Load event) {
World world = event.getWorld();

if (world.isRemote) {
	// Executed even in single player
}
}

 

Is it normal ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Client side != Singleplayer!

 

In singleplayer there is still a server running, only accessible for you unless you open to LAN.

World#isRemote

is true on the

client

side (rendering side), and

false

on the server side (logical side).

Don't PM me with questions. They will be ignored! Make a thread on the appropriate board for support.

 

1.12 -> 1.13 primer by williewillus.

 

1.7.10 and older versions of Minecraft are no longer supported due to it's age! Update to the latest version for support.

 

http://www.howoldisminecraft1710.today/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can only use that on the client side, as the

Minecraft

class is client-side only.

Don't PM me with questions. They will be ignored! Make a thread on the appropriate board for support.

 

1.12 -> 1.13 primer by williewillus.

 

1.7.10 and older versions of Minecraft are no longer supported due to it's age! Update to the latest version for support.

 

http://www.howoldisminecraft1710.today/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is different.

Some blocks can be deactivated from the config file. If they are, so are the associated recipes. If a dedicated server deactivate blocks, the connected client should also deactivate them, because if not, the recipes will still show, but the result cannot be obtain. This is ugly.

There might be other issues I'm not thinking about, but with this, the client is always configured the same way as a dedicated server, except for client only settings but there is only one for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's tricky simply because there is no clean way to intercept that the integrated server has been opened to LAN. I searched for a few minutes and saw nothing: The IntegratedServer#shareToLAN method is called from the button or the command, but I didn't see any way to "register a listener" or something like that.

Like you said, it's simpler to always send it. The client can just ignore it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I was left reeling when a glitch on a cryptocurrency exchange caused me to lose $166,000 worth of my hard-earned savings. It felt like my entire world had crumbled in the blink of an eye, leaving me with a sense of hopelessness. Determined not to give up, I delved into research on recovery options, unsure of what to expect. That's when I stumbled upon I was left reeling when a glitch on a cryptocurrency exchange caused me to lose $166,000 worth of my hard-earned savings. It felt like my entire world had crumbled in the blink of an eye, leaving me with a sense of hopelessness. Determined not to give up, I delved into research on recovery options, unsure of what to expect. That's when I stumbled upon DIGITAL HACK RECOVERY, a beacon of hope in my darkest hour. Despite my initial doubts, I decided to take a leap of faith and give them a shot as a final lifeline. The experts at DIGITAL HACK RECOVERY proved to be masters of their craft, guiding me through their exclusive process with precision and expertise. Utilizing cutting-edge blockchain analysis methods, they were able to track down the elusive trail of my missing funds and identify the exact point of failure. Their forensic talents were unparalleled as they tirelessly combed through the intricate web of blockchain data to locate my cryptocurrency. With each step they took, they kept me informed of their progress, never wavering in their belief that my funds could be rescued. After several painstaking weeks, DIGITAL HACK RECOVERY finally located and restored my $166,000 worth of cryptocurrency. I was awestruck that they were able to salvage what I had thought was lost forever. The whole experience restored my faith in the crypto space and proved that even in the worst situations, recovery is possible with the right experts on your side. I will be forever grateful to DIGITAL HACK RECOVERY for giving me back my life savings when I needed it most. Their tireless efforts and technical mastery turned what could have been a devastating loss into an uplifting success story. Book a time with DIGITAL HACK RECOVERY through: digital hack recovery @ techie . com &  +12018871705
    • public class ParticleReboundRecipe implements Recipe<CraftingContainer> { private List<ParticleReboundIngredient> inputs; private ParticleReboundFuel fuel; private ItemStack output; public ParticleReboundRecipe(List<ParticleReboundIngredient> inputs, ParticleReboundFuel fuel, ItemStack output) { this.inputs = inputs; this.fuel = fuel; this.output = output; } // TODO: Implement interface ... // TODO: Move to separate file if desired public record ParticleReboundIngredient(Ingredient ingredient, int count) { public static final Codec<ParticleReboundIngredient> CODEC = RecordCodecBuilder.create( builder -> builder.group( Ingredient.CODEC.fieldOf("ingredient").forGetter((i) -> i.ingredient), Codec.INT.fieldOf("count").forGetter(i -> i.count) ).apply(builder, ParticleReboundIngredient::new) ); } // TODO: Move to separate file if desired public record ParticleReboundFuel(String tag) { public static final Codec<ParticleReboundFuel> CODEC = RecordCodecBuilder.create( builder -> builder.group(Codec.STRING.fieldOf("tag").forGetter(f -> f.tag)).apply(builder, ParticleReboundFuel::new) ); public boolean isFuel(ItemStack stack) { // TODO: Check if fuel item matches the tag } } public class Serializer implements RecipeSerializer<ParticleReboundRecipe> { public static final Codec<ParticleReboundRecipe> CODEC = RecordCodecBuilder.create( builder -> builder.group( ParticleReboundIngredient.CODEC.listOf().fieldOf("inputs").forGetter(r -> r.inputs), ParticleReboundFuel.CODEC.fieldOf("fuel").forGetter(r -> r.fuel), ItemStack.CODEC.fieldOf("output").forGetter(r -> r.output) ).apply(builder, ParticleReboundRecipe::new) ); @Override public @NotNull Codec<ParticleReboundRecipe> codec() { return CODEC; } // TODO: The rest ... } }   ?
    • I'm sure load and SaveAdditional are what you are looking for, probably. Mind sharing your BE class code? You also need to override onLoad method if you haven't
    • well The problem is the data in mi blockentity, its not being saved when i close the game i put items on it i retrive items from it all just seems good, the problem cames until i close minecraft then when i reload the word i have an older version of the items saved or just an empty briefcase   normally when you declare an entity or a block entity or an item capability, forge automatically keeps track of changes and save the data in nbt format all of this by itself  in this moments i have some items whit capabilities, those work right  i have entities , those also works right  but all of mi blockentities all of them are storages briefcase and all of them fails, save the data sometimes most of the time don't  well i have only like 3 blockentities up now       
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.