[solved] [1.14.4] Can't use a null-name for the registry, object air???

[Invilis]

I can't figure out whats causing this crash: "Can't use a null-name for the registry, object air." I've tried commenting out some of the recently added items but no luck. I don't think any of the items have not had the registry name set. What's strange is the "object air" thing, I don't know what it's trying to tell me and the only reference to my code is "at com.Invilis.items.EpicItems.registerItems(EpicItems.java:165)."

 

Latest Log: https://pastebin.com/rqC7kXs1

EpicItems.java: https://pastebin.com/W1q6D4dF

Edited February 15, 2020 by Invilis

[imacatlolol]

athelasTea doesn't appear to be given a registry name, unless you're doing it in the item's constructor or something.

[Invilis]

Oh, I double checked all the items but I didn't see that one because the line was so small ?. If only the error was more helpful.

[Draco18s]

35 minutes ago, Invilis said:

Oh, I double checked all the items but I didn't see that one because the line was so small ?. If only the error was more helpful.

It unfortunately can't be, because when trying to print out what block causes a problem, it queries the registry name. If that's null, the query ends up returning Air.

[Invilis]

2 hours ago, Draco18s said:

It unfortunately can't be, because when trying to print out what block causes a problem, it queries the registry name. If that's null, the query ends up returning Air.

I see, I just remember it being more helpful for other items in the past (like maybe a more specific line number, I can't remember). I just need to remember next time lol ?

Edited February 15, 2020 by Invilis

[Draco18s]

43 minutes ago, Invilis said:

I see, I just remember it being more helpful for other items in the past (like maybe a more specific line number, I can't remember). I just need to remember next time lol ?

You mean this one?

at com.Invilis.items.EpicItems.registerItems(EpicItems.java:165)

"But the error is on 197!" you say.

Except that its not. Its on 165. Because 165 is the starting line for the registerAll() method and the carriage returns don't change that. As far as the JVM knows all of that is on the same line.

Also, don't assign to your mod items fields directly. Either use a DeferredRegister or use the @ObjectHolder annotation.