Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Something I've been noticing and was hoping someone would find a workaround for it is all these conflicting IDs from all these mods, even with 4096 Block IDs available there is still too many IDs being double and triple(or more) used by several different mods.

 

The idea I have is thus: Mod IDs. A "Mod ID" is an ID given to a specific mod so that any Block or Item ID used by that mod are registered to that mod's ID value and therefore referenced through that value. Thus allowing mods to use any and all Block ID values without conflicting with other mods.

 

I do understand that what I'm suggesting may require an extensive overhaul of how Forge is written, and therefore am not afraid of this suggestion not taken too seriously. However, as a solution to a potential future dilemma (possibly even current?), I am making this suggestion to see where everyone's thoughts on the matter lies.

Posted

Won't ever be done, will require changes to be done on mojang's end.

Read the EAQ before posting! OR ELSE!

 

This isn't building better software, its trying to grab a place in the commit list of a highly visible github project.

 

www.forgeessentials.com

 

Don't PM me, I don't check this account unless I have to.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The game crashed whilst unexpected error Error: net.minecraftforge.fml.ModLoadingException: Advanced Mining Dimension (mining_dimension) encountered an error during the done event phase
    • Here is the end of the log. it was way too big to put in pastebin, but I started from when I was online and everything was fine. Error should be in here: https://pastebin.com/Sdhdq593
    • Update: I stand corrected as I was able to dig up a relevant log from my earlier testing which highlights the overall issue but does not explain how to solve it. See, Diagnostic Logs for pack.mcmeta not found: https://pastebin.com/LXS8Rtna
    • Which mod was this? What are all the mods that were in use? It will help if enough information to replicate the problem is available.
    • I have been attempting to create a supplementary resource pack with Patchouli in order to add back the guidebook for Better End but unfortunately in every prototype I have made pack.mcmeta and my resource pack are not recognized. I have tested both zipped and unzipped and either way curseforge does not recognize my resource pack as existing. For testing I stripped my pack down to just the pack.mcmeta file and two empty folders labelled data and assets and I know the data folder is not the problem as firstly my first attempts just had an assets folder following Patchouli instructions and data came later in my flailing attempts to make anything in my pack work. The mcmeta file is not recognized whether or not I use this:  { "pack": { "pack_format": 15, "description": "A replacement for the BetterEnd Guide Book." } "language": { "en_US": { "name": "English", "region": "United States" } } } ,or this:  { "pack": { "pack_format": 15, "description": "A replacement for the BetterEnd Guide Book." } } I have made sure to only use lowercase and the pack folder is named better-end-guide. Is this some magic nonsense from me doing this manually instead of using an IDE or similar tool? Could it be because my files are by default in UTF-8 even though ANSI gives the same results? Is there a specific community secret tool I am supposed to use for zipping or specific settings? I am pulling my hair in distress. Unfortunately as there are no errors involved I lack logs to offer, if that disqualifies this thread please do not be harsh and instead if you can then please direct me to a forum with different rules and sufficiently respectful but knowledgeable as to be of assistance. Most of my experience with the programming community has been poor and so naturally I find myself wary.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.