Jump to content

[SOLVED][SLOTS][1.5.1] limitations to only accept blocks


Recommended Posts

Posted

so i know that when limitating the slot to only accept item you need this code:

    @Override
    public boolean isItemValid(ItemStack par1ItemStack) {
            if (par1ItemStack != null)
           {
                    Item item = par1ItemStack.getItem();
                    return item != null && item == EsteticsPLUS.HydrocroconyxIngot;
            }
            return false;
    }
   
    

 

but how can i do the same thing with blocks so it only accepts  blocks and not items

Posted

I don't know howto do this exactly, butyou have to do something like:

 

@Override

public boolean isItemvalid(ItemStack par1ItemStack) {

    if(par1ItemStack !=null)

    {

        if(par1ItemStack instanceof Block)

        {

            return true;

        }

        return false;

    }

}

Don't PM me with questions. They will be ignored! Make a thread on the appropriate board for support.

 

1.12 -> 1.13 primer by williewillus.

 

1.7.10 and older versions of Minecraft are no longer supported due to it's age! Update to the latest version for support.

 

http://www.howoldisminecraft1710.today/

Posted

Or

 

@Override
public boolean isItemvalid(ItemStack par1ItemStack) {
    if(par1ItemStack !=null)
    {
         if(par1ItemStack.getItem() instanceof Block)
        {
             return true;
        }
        return false;
    }
}

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Posted

Or

 

@Override
public boolean isItemvalid(ItemStack par1ItemStack) {
    if(par1ItemStack !=null)
    {
         if(par1ItemStack.getItem() instanceof Block)
        {
             return true;
        }
        return false;
    }
}

 

this method doesnt work ...

 

 

You actually need to do:

    @Override
    public boolean isItemValid(ItemStack stack) {
            if (stack != null && stack.getItem() != null && Block.blocksList[stack.getItem().itemID] != null)
           {
                    return true;
            }
            return false;
    }

 

but how do i actually define that only blocks cacn be accepted currently this accepts evrything ...

Posted

but how do i actually define that only blocks cacn be accepted currently this accepts evrything ...

 

If Block.blocksList[stack.getItem().itemID] is returning null, that means that the item is not a block, ergo if its not null it must be a block.  Ergo allow it (return true).

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Posted

@Override
public boolean isItemvalid(ItemStack par1ItemStack) {
    if(par1ItemStack !=null)
    {
         if(par1ItemStack.getItem() instanceof Block)
        {
             return true;
        }
    }
    return false;
}

-Fixed. It didn't work because of the return statement. I haven't actually tried to do this, but it should work.

Read my thoughts on my summer mod work and tell me what you think!

http://www.minecraftforge.net/forum/index.php/topic,8396.0.html

 

I absolutely love her when she smiles

Posted

but how do i actually define that only blocks cacn be accepted currently this accepts evrything ...

 

If Block.blocksList[stack.getItem().itemID] is returning null, that means that the item is not a block, ergo if its not null it must be a block.  Ergo allow it (return true).

Actually, I feel like this would give array out of bounds errors if you were looking at an item. The blocksList array only has 4096 spaces and item id's go far higher than that, so wouldn't that end up giving you out of bound errors if it isn't a block?

Read my thoughts on my summer mod work and tell me what you think!

http://www.minecraftforge.net/forum/index.php/topic,8396.0.html

 

I absolutely love her when she smiles

Posted

but how do i actually define that only blocks cacn be accepted currently this accepts evrything ...

 

If Block.blocksList[stack.getItem().itemID] is returning null, that means that the item is not a block, ergo if its not null it must be a block.  Ergo allow it (return true).

Actually, I feel like this would give array out of bounds errors if you were looking at an item. The blocksList array only has 4096 spaces and item id's go far higher than that, so wouldn't that end up giving you out of bound errors if it isn't a block?

 

Probably, but you could check for it.  (i.e. && getItem().itemID < 4096...)

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Posted

but how do i actually define that only blocks cacn be accepted currently this accepts evrything ...

 

If Block.blocksList[stack.getItem().itemID] is returning null, that means that the item is not a block, ergo if its not null it must be a block.  Ergo allow it (return true).

 

but your code doesnt work .... it makes it so evrything is accepted

Posted

but how do i actually define that only blocks cacn be accepted currently this accepts evrything ...

 

If Block.blocksList[stack.getItem().itemID] is returning null, that means that the item is not a block, ergo if its not null it must be a block.  Ergo allow it (return true).

 

but your code doesnt work .... it makes it so evrything is accepted

if you want it so only blocks can be placed in it, you need a custom slot.

Posted

but how do i actually define that only blocks cacn be accepted currently this accepts evrything ...

 

If Block.blocksList[stack.getItem().itemID] is returning null, that means that the item is not a block, ergo if its not null it must be a block.  Ergo allow it (return true).

 

but your code doesnt work .... it makes it so evrything is accepted

if you want it so only blocks can be placed in it, you need a custom slot.

 

 

and thats why i have a custom slot look here:

package EsteticsPLUS;



import net.minecraft.block.Block;
import net.minecraft.inventory.IInventory;
import net.minecraft.inventory.Slot;
import net.minecraft.item.ItemStack;

;

public class SlotTraider3 extends Slot {

    public SlotTraider3(IInventory par1iInventory, int par2, int par3, int par4) {
        super(par1iInventory, par2, par3, par4);
        
    }
    
    @Override
    public boolean isItemValid(ItemStack stack) {
            if (Block.blocksList[stack.getItem().itemID] != null)
           {
                    return true;
            }
            else return false;
           
    }
        
}

Posted

Use:

 

@Override
public boolean isItemvalid(ItemStack par1ItemStack) {
    if(par1ItemStack !=null)
    {
         if(par1ItemStack.getItem() instanceof Block)
        {
             return true;
        }
    }
    return false;
}

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Posted

you could always do this

    
public boolean isItemValid(ItemStack stack) {
try{
            if (stack != null && stack.getItem() != null && Block.blocksList[stack.getItem().itemID] != null)
           {
                    return true;
            }
}catch(Exception e){
            return false;
}
    }

Posted

Dirty hacks version. THIS WORKS. I went in and tried it myself because everything else people are suggesting somehow doesn't work.

    @Override
    public boolean isItemValid(ItemStack par1ItemStack) {
    	if(par1ItemStack !=null)
    	{
    		if(par1ItemStack.itemID < Block.blocksList.length && Block.blocksList[par1ItemStack.itemID] != null &&
    			!Block.blocksList[par1ItemStack.itemID].getLocalizedName().equals("tile.ForgeFiller.name"))
    		{
    			return true;
    		}
    	}
    	return false;
    }

Read my thoughts on my summer mod work and tell me what you think!

http://www.minecraftforge.net/forum/index.php/topic,8396.0.html

 

I absolutely love her when she smiles

Posted

Dirty hacks version. THIS WORKS. I went in and tried it myself because everything else people are suggesting somehow doesn't work.

    @Override
    public boolean isItemValid(ItemStack par1ItemStack) {
    	if(par1ItemStack !=null)
    	{
    		if(par1ItemStack.itemID < Block.blocksList.length && Block.blocksList[par1ItemStack.itemID] != null &&
    			!Block.blocksList[par1ItemStack.itemID].getLocalizedName().equals("tile.ForgeFiller.name"))
    		{
    			return true;
    		}
    	}
    	return false;
    }

 

thanks for finally making something that works :P

Posted

thanks for finally making something that works :P

I have absolutely no idea why nothing else would work. I went in and tried it and I just tried different things until I found something items failed at. Haha.

But, be warned that this is probably not a good solution. I don't know a good solution, but this seems very sketchy to me. It seems to work, but I can't guarantee it continuing to work, so in spare time you may want to look into finding a different solution.

Read my thoughts on my summer mod work and tell me what you think!

http://www.minecraftforge.net/forum/index.php/topic,8396.0.html

 

I absolutely love her when she smiles

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I know that this may be a basic question, but I am very new to modding. I am trying to have it so that I can create modified Vanilla loot tables that use a custom enchantment as a condition (i.e. enchantment present = item). However, I am having trouble trying to implement this; the LootItemRandomChanceWithEnchantedBonusCondition constructor needs a Holder<Enchantment> and I am unable to use the getOrThrow() method on the custom enchantment declared in my mod's enchantments class. Here is what I have so far in the GLM:   protected void start(HolderLookup.Provider registries) { HolderLookup.RegistryLookup<Enchantment> registrylookup = registries.lookupOrThrow(Registries.ENCHANTMENT); LootItemRandomChanceWithEnchantedBonusCondition lootItemRandomChanceWithEnchantedBonusCondition = new LootItemRandomChanceWithEnchantedBonusCondition(0.0f, LevelBasedValue.perLevel(0.07f), registrylookup.getOrThrow(*enchantment here*)); this.add("nebu_from_deepslate", new AddItemModifier(new LootItemCondition[]{ LootItemBlockStatePropertyCondition.hasBlockStateProperties(Blocks.DEEPSLATE).build(), LootItemRandomChanceCondition.randomChance(0.25f).build(), lootItemRandomChanceWithEnchantedBonusCondition }, OrichalcumItems.NEBU.get())); }   Inserting Enchantments.[vanilla enchantment here] actually works but trying to declare an enchantment from my custom enchantments class as [mod enchantment class].[custom enchantment] does not work even though they are both a ResourceKey and are registered in Registries.ENCHANTMENT. Basically, how would I go about making it so that a custom enchantment declared as a ResourceKey<Enchantment> of value ResourceKey.create(Registries.ENCHANTMENT, ResourceLocation.fromNamespaceAndPath([modid], [name])), declared in a seperate enchantments class, can be used in the LootItemRandomChanceWithEnchantedBonusCondition constructor as a Holder? I can't use getOrThrow() because there is no level or block entity/entity in the start() method and it is running as datagen. It's driving me nuts.
    • Hi here is an update. I was able to fix the code so my mod does not crash Minecraft. Please understand that I am new to modding but I honestly am having a hard time understanding how anyone can get this to work without having extensive programming and debugging experience as well as searching across the Internet, multiple gen AI bots (claude, grok, openai), and examining source code hidden in the gradle directory and in various github repositories. I guess I am wrong because clearly there are thousands of mods so maybe I am just a newbie. Ok, rant over, here is a step by step summary so others can save the 3 days it took me to figure this out.   1. First, I am using forge 54.1.0 and Minecraft 1.21.4 2. I am creating a mod to add a shotgun to Minecraft 3. After creating the mod and compiling it, I installed the .jar file to the proper directory in Minecraft and used 1.21.4-forge-54.1.0 4. The mod immediately crashed with the error: Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException: Item id not set 5. Using the stack trace, I determined that the Exception was being thrown from the net.minecraft.world.item.Item.Properties class 6. It seems that there are no javadocs for this class, so I used IntelliJ which was able to provide a decompiled version of the class, which I then examined to see the source of the error. Side question: Are there javadocs? 7. This method, specifically, was the culprit: protected String effectiveDescriptionId() {      return this.descriptionId.get(Objects.requireNonNull(this.id, "Item id not set"));  } 8. Now my quest was to determine how to set this.id. Looking at the same source file, I determined there was another method:  public Item.Properties setId(ResourceKey<Item> pId) {             this.id = pId;             return this;   } 9. So now, I need to figure out how to call setId(). This required working backwards a bit. Starting from the constructor, I stubbed out the variable p which is of type Item.Properties public static final RegistryObject<Item> SHOTGUN = ITEMS.register("shotgun", () -> new ShotgunItem(p)); Rather than putting this all on one line, I split it up for readability like this: private static final Item.Properties p = new Item.Properties().useItemDescriptionPrefix().setId(rk); Here is was the missing function, setId(), which takes a type of ResourceKey<Item>. My next problem is that due to the apparent lack of documentation (I tried searching the docs on this site) I could not determine the full import path to ResourceKey. I did some random searching on the Internet and stumbled across a Github repository which gave two clues: import net.minecraft.resources.ResourceKey; import net.minecraft.resources.ResourceLocation; Then I created the rk variable like this: private static ResourceKey<Item> rk = ResourceKey.create(Registries.ITEM, ResourceLocation.parse("modid:shotgunmod")); And now putting it all together in order: private static ResourceKey<Item> rk = ResourceKey.create(Registries.ITEM, ResourceLocation.parse("modid:shotgunmod")); private static final Item.Properties p = new Item.Properties().useItemDescriptionPrefix().setId(rk); public static final RegistryObject<Item> SHOTGUN = ITEMS.register("shotgun", () -> new ShotgunItem(p)); This compiled and the mod no longer crashes. I still have more to do on it, but hopefully this will save someone hours. I welcome any feedback and if I missed some obvious modding resource or tutorial that has this information. If not, I might suggest we add it somewhere for people trying to write a mod that doesn't crash. Thank you !!!  
    • I will keep adding to this thread with more information in case anyone can help, or at the very least I can keep my troubleshooting organized. I decided to downgrade to 54.1.0 in the hopes that this would fix the issue but it didn't. At least now I am on a "recommended" version. The crash report did confirm my earlier post that the Exception is coming from effectiveDescriptionId(). I'll continue to see if I can find a way to set the ID manually.   Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException: Item id not set         at java.base/java.util.Objects.requireNonNull(Objects.java:259) ~[?:?]         at TRANSFORMER/[email protected]/net.minecraft.world.item.Item$Properties.effectiveDescriptionId(Item.java:465) ~[forge-1.21.4-54.1.0-client.jar!/:?]         at TRANSFORMER/[email protected]/net.minecraft.world.item.Item.<init>(Item.java:111) ~[forge-1.21.4-54.1.0-client.jar!/:?]         at TRANSFORMER/[email protected]/com.example.shotgunmod.ShotgunItem.<init>(ShotgunItem.java:19) ~[shotgunmod-1.0.0.jar!/:1.0.0]         at TRANSFORMER/[email protected]/com.example.shotgunmod.ModItems.lambda$static$0(ModItems.java:15) ~[shotgunmod-1.0.0.jar!/:1.0.0]         at TRANSFORMER/[email protected]/net.minecraftforge.registries.DeferredRegister$EventDispatcher.lambda$handleEvent      
    • It just randomly stop working after a rebooted my dedicated server PLEASE HELP!   com.google.gson   Failed to start the minecraft server com.google.gson.JsonSyntaxException: Expected a com.google.gson.JsonObject but was com.google.gson.JsonPrimitive; at path $  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.