Jump to content

is 161 stable now


hydroflame

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, title says it all

 

to those who used 1.6.1, would you say its stable now? are most method deofbfuscated yet ?

 

Forge is not yet at it's recommended build, maybe it will be at the beginning of next week according to what's been said.

Forge builds do not change the deofbfuscated names, that is MCP and their mappings. So there we just have to wait some.

Luckly names are easy to fix and change so no worries.

 

So 1.6.X is NOT stable yet and wont be for a least a few days.

Which you could see since there's no recommended build and the release thread for forge for 1.6.X clearly states this :)

If you guys dont get it.. then well ya.. try harder...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah i know theres no "recommended" build, but i wanted to ask people opinion on its stability overall as i don't want to upgrade to something ill spend more time debugging then actually coding my features

 

about the obfuscation mapping being mcp: yeah, sorry i forgot they're 2 different things xD

 

i can read the release thread y'know :P

how to debug 101:http://www.minecraftforge.net/wiki/Debug_101

-hydroflame, author of the forge revolution-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So, lately my modloader (curseforge) has been loading 162 mods instead of the 97 that my modpack only has, appart of that, when I try to join onto my public server the curseforge logs just starts spamming "OpenGL debug message: id=1280, source=API, type=ERROR, severity=HIGH, message='GL error GL_INVALID_ENUM'" and just freezes, my drivers are up to date, I've reinstalled curseforge, same with minecraft launcher, the java is updated, I've got enough ram and I got no viruses, Long after all this happened, my game could enter my online server and it didn't register as many mods, even my game was running at 40 fps, now I can't even play multiplayer, and when I try singleplayer, it goes about 20 fps to 10
    • It does but I'm struggling to see how to make it work in my recipe? (Its structure is the same as OP's, with a serializer subclass)
    • That looks pretty cool, nice!   Sure, so looking at that JSON file I posted, I pretty much made a record class for each "custom" data type in that JSON. The Input is a good example of why ``` "inputs": [ { "ingredient": { "item": "relativedimensions:aberrant_shard" }, "count": 8 } ], ``` So here's the inputs, it's an array, which we can use the Codec builder's builder.listOf to define an array. Each Item is of some arbitrary object with keys "ingredient" (which we know is an Ingredient) and a "count" which is an int. You don't have to have an intermediate class to map this to necessarily but I found that it's just easier to see the data that way, hence the 'ParticleReboundIngredient' represents one of these inputs.   Let me know if that makes sense or not. 
    • Pretty much, although all the recipes im planning to make on it are shapeless. The idea is that the chamber uses energy to "fuse" the items in each of the center slots together, in this case an ingot. The two slots at the sides are fuel. (A special kind of wood in this case). Here is an image of the interface just for reference (The center slot is the output)   As for the code- Can you elaborate a little bit on it? Seeing three different record classes has confused me a lot. (Elaborate as in why make them in three different records. I understand the code itself more or less)
    • Hello im trying to make a mod and the past few days GSON has almost killed me, when i export the mod and then launch it through minecraft launcher i get java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: com.google.gson.JsonParser.parseString(Ljava/lang/String;)Lcom/google/gson/JsonElement; i have literally tried everything here is my build config   dependencies { minecraft("com.mojang:minecraft:1.8.9") mappings("de.oceanlabs.mcp:mcp_stable:22-1.8.9") forge("net.minecraftforge:forge:1.8.9-11.15.1.2318-1.8.9") compileOnly("cc.polyfrost:oneconfig-1.8.9-forge:0.2.2-alpha+") shadowImpl("cc.polyfrost:oneconfig-wrapper-launchwrapper:1.0.0-beta+") { isTransitive = false exclude(module = "gson") } shadowImpl("org.spongepowered:mixin:0.7.11-SNAPSHOT") { isTransitive = false exclude(module = "gson") } annotationProcessor("org.spongepowered:mixin:0.8.5-SNAPSHOT") shadowImpl("org.javassist:javassist:3.15.0-GA") { isTransitive = false exclude(module = "gson") } shadowImpl("com.neovisionaries:nv-i18n:1.28") { isTransitive = false exclude(module = "gson") } shadowImpl("org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.4") { isTransitive = false exclude(module = "gson") } shadowImpl("org.apache.httpcomponents:httpcore:4.4.5") { isTransitive = false exclude(module = "gson") } compileOnly("com.google.code.gson:gson:2.8.6") { isTransitive = false } configurations.all { resolutionStrategy { force("com.google.code.gson:gson:2.8.6") } } shadowImpl(fileTree( mapOf( "dir" to "libs", "include" to listOf("*.jar"), "exclude" to listOf( "asm", "asm-commons", "asm-tree", "gson", "unspecified", "nv-i18n" ) ) )) }  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.