Jump to content

Looking for people to help test this modeller!


Flenix

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

 

As some of you may have seen, I recently had a lot of issues getting a working tessellator.

I've now got it, so I've modified an old model editor made by IceReaper (from MoreMaterials, a Spout plugin) to hopefully throw out tessellator code.

 

I need people to test it and give me feedback. It's not perfected interface yet (for example there's a bug where once you create a shape, you can't edit/delete it), but if you could make some things, use the code and tell me if you have issues that would be lovely :)

 

 

You'll need to set up the rest of the ISBRH yourself. It only exports the renderWorldBlock method.

 

http://www.silvania.co.uk/model/forge

 

It's very shoddy, and should not be used properly just yet!

 

For an example, here's an upper-half slab:

521341750a29d.jpg

 

And the Export box gave me this code:

    @Override
    @SideOnly(Side.CLIENT)
    public boolean renderWorldBlock(IBlockAccess world, int x, int y, int z, Block block, int modelId, RenderBlocks renderer) {
        int meta = world.getBlockMetadata(x, y, z);
        int side = 0; //Change as required
        Icon icon = block.getIcon(side, meta);

        //Change stone to whatever block you want to mimic for light interaction. Not 100% precise!
        int brightness = Block.blocksList[block.stone.blockID].getMixedBrightnessForBlock(world, x, y, z);

        float u = icon.getMinU();
        float v = icon.getMinV();
        float U = icon.getMaxU();
        float V = icon.getMaxV();

        Tessellator tess = Tessellator.instance;
        tess.addTranslation(x, y, z);
        tess.setBrightness(brightness);
        tess.setColorOpaque_F(1.0F, 1.0F, 1.0F);

        tess.addVertexWithUV(0 1 1, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(1 1 1, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(1 1 0, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(0 1 0, u, v);

        tess.addVertexWithUV(0 0.5 1, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(1 0.5 1, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(1 1 1, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(0 1 1, u, v);

        tess.addVertexWithUV(1 1 1, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(1 0.5 1, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(1 0.5 0, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(1 1 0, u, v);

        tess.addVertexWithUV(0 1 0, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(1 1 0, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(1 0.5 0, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(0 0.5 0, u, v);

        tess.addVertexWithUV(0 0.5 1, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(0 1 1, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(0 1 0, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(0 0.5 0, u, v);

        tess.addVertexWithUV(1 0.5 1, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(0 0.5 1, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(0 0.5 0, u, v);
        tess.addVertexWithUV(1 0.5 0, u, v);

    }

 

The main issue right now is the UVs aren't done yet. You need to edit them for each quad, like so:

U, V

U, v

u, v

u, V

 

(To display your texture upright. Change it if you want to rotate the texture)

 

 

UPDATE:

I've remade it using a different base. It certainly looks much nicer now, and it's text-to-edit instead of button to edit, which makes workflow a bit faster but a slightly steeper learning curve.

 

It also gives you much more control.

 

This version still has the above-mentioned UV bug, and also the cube is currently offset by half a block in each direction. I'll fix that later

http://silvania.co.uk/model/asmt/

 

Tell me which of the two editors you prefer!

width=463 height=200

http://s13.postimg.org/z9mlly2av/siglogo.png[/img]

My mods (Links coming soon)

Cities | Roads | Remula | SilvaniaMod | MoreStats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhm is this use for blocks that needs models ?

 

Blocks which use the tessellator for models, yes. It's quite different to Techne- this wont cover mobs or animated models, just straight up models (for example the in-game Fence)

 

 

I'm re-writing with a different core at the moment which should make it much easier to use.

width=463 height=200

http://s13.postimg.org/z9mlly2av/siglogo.png[/img]

My mods (Links coming soon)

Cities | Roads | Remula | SilvaniaMod | MoreStats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh ok ill try this seems interesting . By the way will you possibly include mobs  and stuff here ?

 

I'm not sure if mobs can actually be made with the tessellator, you'll have to use techne and a model file for that.

Check the OP, just added a link to the newer one.

width=463 height=200

http://s13.postimg.org/z9mlly2av/siglogo.png[/img]

My mods (Links coming soon)

Cities | Roads | Remula | SilvaniaMod | MoreStats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if mobs can actually be made with the tessellator, you'll have to use techne and a model file for that.

Check the OP, just added a link to the newer one.

 

I'm not sure if mobs can actually be made with the tessellator

yes

 

you'll have to use techne and a model file for that.

or dear god not techne, please use wavefront files :)

 

how to debug 101:http://www.minecraftforge.net/wiki/Debug_101

-hydroflame, author of the forge revolution-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you could techne or write the code manually, I guess techne is easier than that.

But if you want a mob, you would want animations which are easily added to models written manually (or by techne),

but seemingly not that easy with wavefront files?

 

I assume that by using a wavefront file you could create the model and the whole animation in Maya(Or blender or similar 3d editors) and then just import the animation from that? That would be quite a lot better than techne for sure :)

If you guys dont get it.. then well ya.. try harder...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah the thing is we dont have a loader for any animation files. and i dont want to write one xD its sooo f***ing long!

 

but its "possible" to do animation via wavefront ... but it kinda sucks, plus its not like techne support animation either ...

how to debug 101:http://www.minecraftforge.net/wiki/Debug_101

-hydroflame, author of the forge revolution-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've done animations for mobs with techne, but never tried blocks to be honest. I only recommended techne as it's easier for newbies than something like blender.

 

That being said, one of the default plugins of the engine I'm using is a wavefront editor. And, when I get my plugin working on there, you can convert between wavefront and tessellator models at the click of a button. ;)

width=463 height=200

http://s13.postimg.org/z9mlly2av/siglogo.png[/img]

My mods (Links coming soon)

Cities | Roads | Remula | SilvaniaMod | MoreStats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've done animations for mobs with techne

 

good to knwo, i tought it couldnt

 

I only recommended techne as it's easier for newbies than something like blender.

yeha, but blender makes way more efficient models and way more beautifull models :)

 

 

btw if your program ever outputs code, can you have a class that will automaticly use display list ?

how to debug 101:http://www.minecraftforge.net/wiki/Debug_101

-hydroflame, author of the forge revolution-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm developing a dimension, but it's kinda resource intensive so some times during player teleporting it lags behind making the player phase down into the void, so im trying to implement some kind of pregeneration to force the game loading a small set of chunks in the are the player will teleport to. Some of the things i've tried like using ServerLevel and ServerChunkCache methods like getChunk() dont actually trigger chunk generation if the chunk isn't already on persistent storage (already generated) or placing tickets, but that doesn't work either. Ideally i should be able to check when the task has ended too. I've peeked around some pregen engines, but they're too complex for my current understanding of the system of which I have just a basic understanding (how ServerLevel ,ServerChunkCache  and ChunkMap work) of. Any tips or other classes I should be looking into to understand how to do this correctly?
    • https://mclo.gs/4UC49Ao
    • Way back in the Forge 1.17 days, work started for adding JPMS (Java Platform Module Support) to ModLauncher and ForgeModLoader. This has been used internally by Forge and some libraries for a while now, but mods (those with mods.toml specifically) have not been able to take advantage of it. As of Forge 1.21.1 and 1.21.3, this is now possible!   What is JPMS and what does it mean for modders? JPMS is the Java Platform Module System, introduced in Java 9. It allows you to define modules, which are collections of packages and resources that can be exported or hidden from other modules. This allows for much more fine-tuned control over visibility, cleaner syntax for service declarations and support for sealed types across packages. For example, you might have a mod with a module called `com.example.mod` that exports `com.example.mod.api` and `com.example.mod.impl` to other mods, but hides `com.example.mod.internal` from them. This would allow you to have a clean API for other mods to use, while keeping your internal implementation details hidden from IDE hints, helping prevent accidental usage of internals that might break without prior notice. This is particularly useful if you'd like to use public records with module-private constructors or partially module-private record components, as you can create a sealed interface that only your record implements, having the interface be exported and the record hidden. It's also nice for declaring and using services, as you'll get compile-time errors from the Java compiler for typos and the like, rather than deferring to runtime errors. In more advanced cases, you can also have public methods that are only accessible to specific other modules -- handy if you want internal interactions between multiple of your own mods.   How do I bypass it? We understand there may be drama in implementing a system that prevents mods from accessing each other's internals when necessary (like when a mod is abandoned or you need to fix a compat issue) -- after all, we are already modding a game that doesn't have explicit support for Java mods yet. We have already thought of this and are offering APIs from day one to selectively bypass module restrictions. Let me be clear: Forge mods are not required to use JPMS. If you don't want to use it, you don't have to. The default behaviour is to have fully open, fully exported automatic modules. In Java, you can use the `Add-Opens` and `Add-Exports` manifest attributes to selectively bypass module restrictions of other mods at launch time, and we've added explicit support for these when loading your Forge mods. At compile-time, you can use existing solutions such as the extra-java-module-info Gradle plugin to deal with non-modular dependencies and add extra opens and exports to other modules. Here's an example on how to make the internal package `com.example.examplemod.internal` open to your mod in your build.gradle: tasks.named('jar', Jar) { manifest { attributes([ 'Add-Opens' : 'com.example.examplemod/com.example.examplemod.internal' 'Specification-Title' : mod_id, 'Specification-Vendor' : mod_authors // (...) ]) } } With the above in your mod's jar manifest, you can now reflectively access the classes inside that internal package. Multiple entries are separated with a space, as per Java's official spec. You can also use Add-Exports to directly call without reflection, however you'd need to use the Gradle plugin mentioned earlier to be able to compile. The syntax for Add-Exports is the same as Add-Opens, and instructions for the compile-time step with the Gradle plugin are detailed later in this post. Remember to prefer the opens and exports keywords inside module-info.java for sources you control. The Add-Opens/Add-Exports attributes are only intended for forcing open other mods.   What else is new with module support? Previously, the runtime module name was always forced to the first mod ID in your `mods.toml` file and all packages were forced fully open and exported. Module names are now distinguished from mod IDs, meaning the module name in your module-info.java can be different from the mod ID in your `mods.toml`. This allows you to have a more descriptive module name that doesn't have to be the same as your mod ID, however we strongly recommend including your mod ID as part of your module name to aid troubleshooting. The `Automatic-Module-Name` manifest attribute is now also honoured, allowing you to specify a module name for your mod without needing to create a `module-info.java` file. This is particularly useful for mods that don't care about JPMS features but want to have a more descriptive module name and easier integration with other mods that do use JPMS.   How do I use it? The first step is to create a `module-info.java` file in your mod's source directory. This file should be in the same package as your main mod class, and should look something like this: open module com.example.examplemod { requires net.minecraftforge.eventbus; requires net.minecraftforge.fmlcore; requires net.minecraftforge.forge; requires net.minecraftforge.javafmlmod; requires net.minecraftforge.mergetool.api; requires org.slf4j; requires logging; } For now, we're leaving the whole module open to reflection, which is a good starting point. When we know we want to close something off, we can remove the open modifier from the module and open or export individual packages instead. Remember that you need to be open to Forge (module name net.minecraftforge.forge), otherwise it can't call your mod's constructor. Next is fixing modules in Gradle. While Forge and Java support modules properly, Gradle does not put automatic modules on the module path by default, meaning that the logging module (from com.mojang:logging) is not found. To fix this, add the Gradle plugin and add a compile-time module definition for that Mojang library: plugins { // (...) id 'org.gradlex.extra-java-module-info' version "1.9" } // (...) extraJavaModuleInfo { failOnMissingModuleInfo = false automaticModule("com.mojang:logging", "logging") } The automatic module override specified in your build.gradle should match the runtime one to avoid errors. You can do the same for any library or mod dependency that is missing either a module-info or explicit Automatic-Module-Name, however be aware that you may need to update your mod once said library adds one. That's all you need to get started with module support in your mods. You can learn more about modules and how to use them at dev.java.
    • Faire la mise à jour grâce à ce lien m'a aider personnellement, merci à @Paint_Ninja. https://www.amd.com/en/support 
    • When I came across the 'Exit Code: I got a 1 error in my Minecraft mods, so I decided to figure out what was wrong. First, I took a look at the logs. In the mods folder (usually where you'd find logs or crash reports), I found the latest.log file or the corresponding crash report. I read it through carefully, looking for any lines with errors or warnings. Then I checked the Minecraft Forge support site, where you can often find info on what causes errors and how to fix them. I then disabled half of my mods and tried running the game. If the error disappeared, it meant that the problem was with the disabled mod. I repeated this several times to find the problem mod.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.