Jump to content

[1.7.2] thoughts about manual deobfuscation


libarclite

Recommended Posts

Since eclipse is so powerful for refactoring, I'm tempted to manually deobfuscate methods as I discover what they do. However, I would like to provide a bread crumb for the reobfuscation process to use when I want to deploy my mod. Has anybody ever considered using Java annotations to leave such a breadcrumb? Something like:

 

@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)

@Target(ElementType.METHOD)

public @interface Breadcrumb

{

    /**

    * The unique mod identifier for this mod

    */

    String obfuscatedName();

}

 

Then when you rename a method, you'd write:

 

@Breadcrumb(obfuscatedName = "func_149711_c")

public Block setHardness(float hardness) { ... }

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That could be very nice if forge would implement that!

Don't PM me with questions. They will be ignored! Make a thread on the appropriate board for support.

 

1.12 -> 1.13 primer by williewillus.

 

1.7.10 and older versions of Minecraft are no longer supported due to it's age! Update to the latest version for support.

 

http://www.howoldisminecraft1710.today/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not gunna happen, interesting idea, but the better solution that will happen, eventually, is that Forge will become independant of the mcp mappings allowing modders to contribuite to the central naming effort and see there work rewarded.

However, that requires some specialized tools to be re-written so will come in time.

I do Forge for free, however the servers to run it arn't free, so anything is appreciated.
Consider supporting the team on Patreon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.