Jump to content

TileEntity still valid after chunk unloads


JohnyCilohokla

Recommended Posts

Not sure if this is a bug or not but TileEnity stays valid after chunk unloads.

The code for TileEntity (onChunkUnload)

    /**
     * Called when the chunk this TileEntity is on is Unloaded.
     */
    public void onChunkUnload()
    {
    }

As you can see onChunkUnload() doesn't call invalidate()

 

After overriding it with this code:

@Override
public void onChunkUnload() {
	// TODO Auto-generated method stub
	super.onChunkUnload();
	this.invalidate();
}

Everything works and calling isInvalid() for TileEntity returns true.

As i load the TileEntity into List and the execute tick manually I get multiple TileEnities each time chunk reloads.

Also as far as I can tell it could create problem is TileEntity is stored somewhere and unloaded if isInvalid(), as it ever happens if the chunk is unloaded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why the hell are you storing your own list of tile entities and injecting them where they should not be?

Use the systems as intended, its not our problem if you decide to hack shit in and break it.

 

I do Forge for free, however the servers to run it arn't free, so anything is appreciated.
Consider supporting the team on Patreon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure... scanning through all of the entities and calling method only on specific ones makes more sense and is way faster than storing them in separate list and accessing them from there...

Where all you need to do is call invalidate the TileEntity when chunk unload.

 

(compare scanning through lots of entities[called each time] just to find few that you are interested in, to changing 1 variable on chunk unload[called only once])

 

Memory is not an issue.

 

BTW:

Any TileEntity in unloaded chunk is invalid and should be marked as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They may or may not be invalid, there are a few things out there that act wonkey if you call invalidate on unload.

What you should do is hook into the unload event.

And invalidate your list.

 

However, i dont know what you're doing, but it seems like a very bad way to do things....

I do Forge for free, however the servers to run it arn't free, so anything is appreciated.
Consider supporting the team on Patreon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry for the approach, I assumed they get invalidated after chunk unload and was wondering why is doesn't work for over 1 hour and got really pissed off because of it.

I'm aware of the fact that TileEntity gets unloaded straight after chunk gets unloaded, so it is not necessary to call invalidate but it could help mods that store TileEntity instances.

I'm implementing it as @Override method anyway, so that not much of a problem.

I was just trying to suggest that it might be better to make it default or create another TileEntity class (such as CheckedTileEntity)

 

I'm designing a multidimensional system working with inventories.

It will be really complex and needs to be optimized in any possible way to work at any acceptable speed.

Scanning through all TileEntities is not an option.

 

As each time I would need to:

-get item from list

-check if it is instanceof

-cast it if it is

-then work with it

 

Now all I do is:

-invalidate on unload (only when chunk unloads)

-cleanup (from time to time)

-and when I'm calling I check for null pointer and isInvalid() to make sure it is valid

Which works faster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you could do and IF statement and check if the chunk is loaded into the world.

I will be putting in some extra checking (that will be called from time to time):

Probably:

this.worldObj.loadedTileEntityList.contains(this);

 

Or this:

this.worldObj.getChunkProvider().chunkExists(this.xCoord >> 4, this.zCoord >> 4);

But I will have to check this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.