Jump to content

Some major new hooks for Inficraft II


oliverrook

Recommended Posts

Ok, so I've recently started back up work on my "Great work" of a mod, Inficraft II: Modular Infinity. It's a mod where the player can literally take any block in the game, and give it pretty much any property he/she/it wants.

Basically, think Carpenter's Blocks, but strapped to Tinker's Construct, inside Thaumcraft's Lair, with Natura trying to sneak by EE3 to untie Tinker's Construct, while an Greg Tech Nuclear reactor is having a meltdown, on Galactic Craft's Moon, and you'll have the amount of possibilities with this mod when it comes to customizablity. Suffice to say, I've been working on it since before Tinker's Construct came out, and was the one who took Inficraft off of mDiyo's hands so she could work on said mod.

That being said, however, there is a lot of things I need to be able to do, that forge simply can't supply with it's current hooks.

The most major of these are:

1. I need to be able set all of a block properties on the fly, including things such as hardness, texture, light level, size, shape, material type, crafting/inventory abilities, redstone conductivity, and virtually any property pertaining to a block in real time. For some of these, such as texture, light level, crafting/inventory and hardness are already implemented. However, things such as changing a block's base material, and harvest level are much more difficult to accomplish.

2. I would also like to have hooks to determine when these properties change, which would really help with determining when errors of glitches occur, as well as making it so some properties can be disabled under certain circumstances, or to certain players for multiplayer situations.

3. In addition to all this, I need a hook that allows me to create hooks to check for properties changing. This would have many uses, and would actually benefit forge as a whole. It would basically allow a mod creator to create hook functions for the unique NBT data they put in their mods, which would make it much easier for checks, as well as mod compatability, as a modder could use hooks from other mods, rather than having to go in and use an API that may or may not exist. I also need this because I wish to be able to support custom properties for my mod.

 

Also, I feel forge could benefit from incorporating the Colored Lights API into itself once the mod is done.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would go into modder support, bud  ;)  because forge CAN do that.

 

to do this, you would make a fluid block class, and have all the properties set through the constructor.

 

I would reccomend looking at the qcraft source code, that would prolly be a great asset to you.

 

Edit qcraft source: google code

Also, I should have you know that you are reading my signature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The simple answer to what you want is a hell no.

We're not re-writing the entire game engine to make blocks non-singletons.

That would just be crazy.

 

Long answer if depending on how many block states you want to take up your can in theory do whatever you want with them. You'd just be creating every permutation which can get cumbersome.

 

Most things you want already have location sensitive versions you could hook into but there are just some things that cant be localized due to how Minecraft's engine works.

 

So ya, you're not the first one to say 'I WANNA DO EVERYTHING' and programming simply doesn't work like that. It's not magic.

 

Your 'suggestion' is not very well thought through and is not feasible in the Minecraft engine.

I do Forge for free, however the servers to run it arn't free, so anything is appreciated.
Consider supporting the team on Patreon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually Lex, after looking through a bunch of vanilla minecraft code for a while, it became clear to me that minecraft itself actually supports most of what I wanted, as most of the block variables are set to public by default, meaning they can be changed at any time from any class file, so long as they are imported. In addition, I have 9 years programming experiance, and while I may not be very good at it, I do have the benefits of experiance, and through that I have learned that when you have a game's source code at your fingertips, you can potentially turn something like minecraft into something like skyrim, given enough time and dedication. You would simply have to rewrite almost everything in the sourcecode, but you could still technically use the sourcecode as a base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I could re-write Minecraft.

But i'm not going to.

Forge does not have the authority to re-write the base Minecraft engine.

If you wish to change things at that major of a level, just write your own game.

The point is, The blocks are singletons, so yes you could change the 'public variables' whenever you want, but it would affect EVERY one of the block EVERYWHERE.

But ya, feel free to do whatever you want, but please don't break the engine for every other mod that is installed with yours.

I do Forge for free, however the servers to run it arn't free, so anything is appreciated.
Consider supporting the team on Patreon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I am not using hardcoded recipes, I'm using Vanilla's already existing code for leather armor dying. (via extending and implementing DyeableArmorItem / DyeableLeatherItem respectively) I have actually figured out that it's something to do with registering item colors to the ItemColors instance, but I'm trying to figure out where exactly in my mod's code I would be placing a call to the required event handler. Unfortunately the tutorial is criminally undescriptive. The most I've found is that it has to be done during client initialization. I'm currently trying to do the necessary setup via hijacking the item registry since trying to modify the item classes directly (via using SubscribeEvent in the item's constructor didn't work. Class so far: // mrrp mrow - mcmod item painter v1.0 - catzrule ch package catzadvitems.init; import net.minecraft.client.color.item.ItemColors; import net.minecraft.world.item.Item; import net.minecraftforge.registries.ObjectHolder; import net.minecraftforge.fml.event.lifecycle.FMLClientSetupEvent; import net.minecraftforge.fml.common.Mod; import net.minecraftforge.eventbus.api.SubscribeEvent; import net.minecraftforge.client.event.ColorHandlerEvent; import catzadvitems.item.DyeableWoolArmorItem; @Mod.EventBusSubscriber(bus = Mod.EventBusSubscriber.Bus.MOD) public class Painter { @ObjectHolder("cai:dyeable_wool_chestplate") public static final Item W_CHEST = null; @ObjectHolder("cai:dyeable_wool_leggings") public static final Item W_LEGS = null; @ObjectHolder("cai:dyeable_wool_boots") public static final Item W_SOCKS = null; public Painter() { // left blank, idk if forge throws a fit if constructors are missing, not taking the chance of it happening. } @SubscribeEvent public static void init(FMLClientSetupEvent event) { new Painter(); } @Mod.EventBusSubscriber private static class ForgeBusEvents { @SubscribeEvent public static void registerItemColors(ColorHandlerEvent.Item event) { ItemColors col = event.getItemColors(); col.register(DyeableUnderArmorItem::getItemDyedColor, W_CHEST, W_LEGS, W_SOCKS); //placeholder for other dye-able items here later.. } } } (for those wondering, i couldn't think of a creative wool helmet name)
    • nvm found out it was because i had create h and not f
    • Maybe there's something happening in the 'leather armor + dye' recipe itself that would be updating the held item texture?
    • @SubscribeEvent public static void onRenderPlayer(RenderPlayerEvent.Pre e) { e.setCanceled(true); model.renderToBuffer(e.getPoseStack(), pBuffer, e.getPackedLight(), 0f, 0f, 0f, 0f, 0f); //ToaPlayerRenderer.render(); } Since getting the render method from a separate class is proving to be bit of a brick wall for me (but seems to be the solution in older versions of minecraft/forge) I've decided to try and pursue using the renderToBuffer method directly from the model itself. I've tried this route before but can't figure out what variables to feed it for the vertexConsumer and still can't seem to figure it out; if this is even a path to pursue.  The vanilla model files do not include any form of render methods, and seem to be fully constructed from their layer definitions? Their renderer files seem to take their layers which are used by the render method in the vanilla MobRenderer class. But for modded entities we @Override this function and don't have to feed the method variables because of that? I assume that the render method in the extended renderer takes the layer definitions from the renderer classes which take those from the model files. Or maybe instead of trying to use a render method I should be calling the super from the renderer like   new ToaPlayerRenderer(context, false); Except I'm not sure what I would provide for context? There's a context method in the vanilla EntityRendererProvider class which doesn't look especially helpful. I've been trying something like <e.getEntity(), model<e.getEntity()>> since that generally seems to be what is provided to the renderers for context, but I don't know if it's THE context I'm looking for? Especially since the method being called doesn't want to take this or variations of this.   In short; I feel like I'm super super close but I have to be missing something obvious? Maybe this insane inane ramble post will provide some insight into this puzzle?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.