Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

People claim forge is an API but I really don't thinks so. All it does is manage the conflicting parts of minecraft to really do anything you must reach into the minecraft source. I propose that we make an actual API that encapsulates the minecraft source code, much like bukkit. The difference in my mind between forge and bukkit is that with forge the majority of the burden is on the bukkit team while with forge the majority of the burden is on the modders. I absolutely adore forge, but one of the problems is incompatibility between mods and minecraft versions. with bukkit there are three layers: NMS, craftbukkit and bukkit with craftbukkit implementing bukkit. I propose that we take a similar approach and create a real API that modders can use without touching minecraft. There are 100s of dead mods out there and 100s of dead plugins, funny thing is, most of the plugins still function. I would be willing to help with this new API if implemented.

 

Long Live Forge!

Posted

On the other hand, when Minecraft updates, Bukkit takes a year and a half to update all their stuff so that mods are functional with the new version....

Apparently I'm a complete and utter jerk and come to this forum just like to make fun of people, be confrontational, and make your personal life miserable.  If you think this is the case, JUST REPORT ME.  Otherwise you're just going to get reported when you reply to my posts and point it out, because odds are, I was trying to be nice.

 

Exception: If you do not understand Java, I WILL NOT HELP YOU and your thread will get locked.

 

DO NOT PM ME WITH PROBLEMS. No help will be given.

Posted
  On 11/14/2013 at 7:32 PM, Techcable said:
People claim forge is an API but I really don't thinks so. All it does is manage the conflicting parts of minecraft to really do anything you must reach into the minecraft source. I propose that we make an actual API that encapsulates the minecraft source code, much like bukkit.

Lets first off start by saying, that your definition of 'API' is wrong, or, more specifically narrow.

Bukkit is a Abstraction Layer

Forge is Compatibility Layer {Amungst other things}

Forge and Bukkit are both APIs.

 

  Quote
The difference in my mind between forge and bukkit is that with forge the majority of the burden is on the bukkit team while with forge the majority of the burden is on the modders.

Hehehehe.. give me a second.. I need to compose myself ;) hehehe

 

  Quote
I absolutely adore forge, but one of the problems is incompatibility between mods and minecraft versions. with bukkit there are three layers: NMS, craftbukkit and bukkit with craftbukkit implementing bukkit. I propose that we take a similar approach and create a real API that modders can use without touching minecraft. There are 100s of dead mods out there and 100s of dead plugins, funny thing is, most of the plugins still function. I would be willing to help with this new API if implemented.

Why re-implement something that already exists? If you want a bukkit plugin, go use bukkit...

Forge and bukkit have two completely different design philosophies. And, because of that, 1) they can live together {see: MCPC} and 2) You can do things in one that you cannot do in another.

Yes, we could start writing a abstraction layer like you want, but we're not going to.

Bukkit exists, and the next major system like that should come out is the official one, throwing our hat into that is a futile effort and will just fracture the community more.

As for dead mods vs dead plugins... there is nothing wrong with dead mods. Mods die, people move on, typically better mods are produced. And hell if you REALLY want to play a older mod you still can. There is nothing stopping you from loading up a old version of MC and going to town.

I do Forge for free, however the servers to run it arn't free, so anything is appreciated.
Consider supporting the team on Patreon

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • wait, i just did that. why didn't it work? also it's the same. help me!!!!
    • Culprit has been located! It was Tough As Nails + (plus) which was among one of the mods *added* before re-entering, in an attempt to improve compatibility. It, for some reason or another, did not want to work!
    • "You can either try to load it with only the vanilla data pack ("safe mode"), or go back to the title screen and fix it manually." Hello! I encountered this error just now while attempting to re-enter my world for the first time. Notably, no mods were removed before encountering this error and, while being able to find this error elsewhere on the internet, in my scenario it is seemingly caused by a specific mod, of which I cannot isolate. Things I have tried: - Enter "Safe Mode" (fails) - Remove datapacks (no change) - Reverted to old save data (no change) Here is the server log: https://mclo.gs/9vJQEfN I use Modrinth mod loader so please let me know how to share my mod list, and if it is needed.
    • So, i'm hosting (or attempting to host) a port-forwarded modded server for 1.12.2. There's quite a few mods in this pack, but they all run and have no compatibility issues (besides something causing the game to crash if you go fullscreen, a problem ive given up trying to identify or fix). It can run on 6gb of ram or less, and works fine in singleplayer. All of my friends that want to join have the exact same mod/config/game setup as I do (I personally helped them set everything up). Just to be safe, we've all allocated 12 gigabytes of RAM to the installation, and I've also allocated 12GB to the server itself. I am able to join with no issue and it runs fine. However, when they try to join, it gets stuck in the 'logging in' screen before their game becomes unresponsive. When they close it, it gives them the exit code 805306369, which usually means not enough RAM, but this cant be the case. On my screen, in the server, it shows them joining, and then disconnecting, so I dont think its a port-forwarding issue. They can all run it just fine in singleplayer as well. The annoying bit about this particular issue is that it generates no crash log. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks! Here is my debug log, and his, starting from the same place. MINE: [132647] [Netty Client IO #5INFO] [FML] Attempting connection with missing mods [ctm, fusion] at SERVER 132653.817 [132653] [Client threadINFO] [minecraftGuiConnecting] Connecting to 0, 25565 132654.682 [132654] [Netty Client IO #9INFO] [STDOUT] [xaero.common.core.transformer.ClassNodeTransformertransform29] Transforming class brz net.minecraft.client.network.NetHandlerPlayClient 132654.684 [132654] [Netty Client IO #9INFO] [STDOUT] [xaero.map.core.transformer.ClassNodeTransformertransform29] Transforming class net.minecraft.client.network.NetHandlerPlayClient 132654.764 [132654] [Netty Client IO #9INFO] [FML] Server protocol version 2 132654.777 [132654] [Netty Client IO #9INFO] [FML] Attempting connection with missing mods [ctm, fusion] at SERVER 132656.193 [132656] [Client threadINFO] [FML] Injecting existing registry data into this client instance 132659.081 [132659] [Client threadINFO] [FML] Applying holder lookups 132659.082 [132659] [Client threadINFO] [FML] Holder lookups applied 132659.092 [132659] [Netty Client IO #9INFO] [FML] [Netty Client IO #9] Client side modded connection established HIS: [13:12:16] [Netty Client IO #0/INFO] [FML]: Attempting connection with missing mods [ctm, fusion] at SERVER 13:12:25.597 [13:12:25] [Client thread/INFO] [minecraft/GuiConnecting]: Connecting to (my IP address and the server port 25565) 13:12:26.805 [13:12:26] [Netty Client IO #1/INFO] [STDOUT]: [xaero.common.core.transformer.ClassNodeTransformer:transform:29]: Transforming class brz net.minecraft.client.network.NetHandlerPlayClient 13:12:26.808 [13:12:26] [Netty Client IO #1/INFO] [STDOUT]: [xaero.map.core.transformer.ClassNodeTransformer:transform:29]: Transforming class net.minecraft.client.network.NetHandlerPlayClient 13:12:26.936 [13:12:26] [Netty Client IO #1/INFO] [FML]: Server protocol version 2 13:12:27.114 [13:12:27] [Netty Client IO #1/INFO] [FML]: Attempting connection with missing mods [ctm, fusion] at SERVER 13:12:27.480 [13:12:27] [Client thread/INFO] [FML]: Injecting existing registry data into this client instance 13:12:30.669 [13:12:30] [Client thread/INFO] [FML]: Applying holder lookups 13:12:30.671 [13:12:30] [Client thread/INFO] [FML]: Holder lookups applied 13:13:04.700 Process crashed with exit code -805306369 P.S - Both mods "CTM" and "FUSION" are present in both our folders so idk what that's about.
    • Please read the FAQ (link is orange banner at top of page), and post logs as described there, to an external site such as https://mclo.gs  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.