Jump to content

can we have a "forgegradle in a nutshell"


hydroflame

Recommended Posts

I followed the above steps, Worked perfectly :)

 

Although it gave me a workspace with an Minecraft project containing just the example mod's src code.

I can see that the example mod is referencing the Minecraft block class without throwing errors, but I can't view the source for it.

 

So how do I get the files needed to attach the source? :)

 

Nvm, it's comming later :)

Just read Lex's new release post.

At the time of this writing, there are still some features that we are wanting to roll out, namely setupDecompWorkspace which will give you a read-only version of the Minecraft code.

If you guys dont get it.. then well ya.. try harder...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

These steps didn't work for me. The 'src' download didn't contain 'gradlew'. I had to:

 

Step 2.5: gradle init

Step 2.6: gradle wrapper

 

*then* gradlew was available.

 

gradlew seems to correctly download everything. I'm thankful for this because the python scripts have been failing for the past 3 days.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... The src download DOES include gradlew what are you talking about?

If it doesn't you're not using the gradle version of the src. {Meaning, you're not using 1.7.2 or using 953-}

I do Forge for free, however the servers to run it arn't free, so anything is appreciated.
Consider supporting the team on Patreon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Better" building process than Maven and "better" dependency management than Ant, supposedly ?

 

It's not "supposedly" - Gradle is better than both Maven and Ant for many reasons.

 

First, Maven:  Maven is happiest if you do things Maven's way.  Customizing your pom is a chore and a half, and despite Maven's dependency management you'll still run into problems with conflicting plugins in a moderately complex project.  There's nothing wrong with Maven's build process - it works great out of the box...if you want to play strictly by Maven's rules.

 

Ant's strength is ease of customization (relative to Maven).  While it's true you get nothing free with Ant (i.e. an out of the box build process) the joke is that there's only ever been one build.xml ever written and it's been passed around and modified ever since.  Practically speaking anyone developing with Ant will grab an existing build script and quickly tweak it for new development work.  Ant does not come with any dependency management - that has to be added on via Ivy.  Ivy itself is a pain to configure so it's not like Ant+Ivy is a dream solution.

 

A major problem with both Ant and Ivy is their respective build scripts (build.xml and pom.xml) are both written in XML.  XML is not a scripting language - it's a markup language.  Any solution based on scripting with XML is going to be problematic.  This is not a knock on Ant (which I love) and Maven (which I don't) - when both projects were started XML was arguably the best choice for the next generation makefile.

 

Enter Gradle (of which I'm a huge fan)...Gradle combines the best of Ant and Maven while improving on both.  Gradle's "makefile", build.gradle, is written in a domain-specific language based on Groovy.  Groovy itself is pretty, uh, groovy, but that's a lecture for another day :)  Gradle comes with out of the box capabilities and dependency management a la Maven and is even more flexible than Ant.  Gradle uses Ivy under the hood and the integration is done so well that dependency management is easier to configure than it is in Maven.

 

Whoever had the foresight to go with Gradle should get a raise :)

 

That being said, the Forge build process is kind of a mess (the absurd number of tasks in build.gradle are evidence of that) and I think that's a big source of confusion for a lot of people.  No matter the build tool of choice (Ant, Maven, or Gradle), the use of an IDE should not be a factor if the build is constructed properly.  It should be possible to pull down the code out of [Git, SVN, whatever] and build a working distro straight from the command line (yes, even with all the hoops that must be jumped through for Minecraft modding).  When it's possible to build a freshly exported codebase from the command line then it's trivial for a developer to use any IDE or text editor.  The more time spent mucking with the build means less time doing the fun stuff...writing code!

 

Oh, and hi, I'm Paul.  I'm pretty handy with Java and such but completely new to Minecraft modding and Forge so I'm sure I'll have a lot of questions.  I'm happy to answer what questions I can and hope to be able to contribute to the project at some point.

 

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That being said, the Forge build process is kind of a mess (the absurd number of tasks in build.gradle are evidence of that) and I think that's a big source of confusion for a lot of people.  No matter the build tool of choice (Ant, Maven, or Gradle), the use of an IDE should not be a factor if the build is constructed properly.  It should be possible to pull down the code out of [Git, SVN, whatever] and build a working distro straight from the command line (yes, even with all the hoops that must be jumped through for Minecraft modding).  When it's possible to build a freshly exported codebase from the command line then it's trivial for a developer to use any IDE or text editor.

Its not a mess, more tasks != mess. Would you rather us bundle everything into a single task and make you have to rerun EVERYTHING every time you setup your env?

As it sits, all you have to care about are the setup* tasks.

I do Forge for free, however the servers to run it arn't free, so anything is appreciated.
Consider supporting the team on Patreon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not a mess, more tasks != mess. Would you rather us bundle everything into a single task and make you have to rerun EVERYTHING every time you setup your env?

As it sits, all you have to care about are the setup* tasks.

 

Don't get me wrong, from what I've seen elsewhere I think Minecraft Forge has the best API and build process going.  If having a boatload of tasks works for the developers and modders, great. 

 

My opinion is that the number of tasks could be greatly reduced by eliminating IDE-specific tasks through an IDE-agnostic build process.  It's also possible the codebase may lend itself to being organized into subprojects but I haven't had a chance to play the with code yet.  I just today finished another side project (building and securing a Multicraft server) so with any luck I'll finally get to tinker with some code!

 

Paul

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a IDE agnostic process, with IDE specific addons because modders are to stubborn/stupid to setup there run configs themselves.

There are only two tasks you should care about 'setupDevWorkspace' and 'jar'

I do Forge for free, however the servers to run it arn't free, so anything is appreciated.
Consider supporting the team on Patreon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.