Forums Migration/Upgrade

[Leomelonseeds 28]

@Draco18s Why do you still use windows 7???

[Draco18s 2392]

4 hours ago, Leomelonseeds said:

@Draco18s Why do you still use windows 7???

Because Windows 7 is still better than literally any other version of Windows?

[Leomelonseeds 28]

Rigggghhhht... Id agree on that. but keep in mind ONE thing. I know how to hack windows 7.

Edited March 4, 2017 by Leomelonseeds

[Draco18s 2392]

59 minutes ago, Leomelonseeds said:

Rigggghhhht... Id agree on that. but keep in mind ONE thing. I know how to hack windows 7.

There is no such thing as "perfect security."

 

Actually there is. It's called "unplugging it from the internet and turning it off."

[Awesome_Spider 64]

And even then there's still home invasions...

[Leomelonseeds 28]

 

48 minutes ago, Draco18s said:

Actually there is. It's called "unplugging it from the internet and turning it off."

Nope. My school computers use windows 7. From the startup repair, I can hack the computers. (shhhhh...)

[diesieben07 7461]

Danger, Leomelonseeds is a L33tHaXX0r.

Seriously though, once you have physical access to a computer  there is almost no amount of security in any OS to prevent you from accessing it, apart from an encrypted harddrive.

[Leomelonseeds 28]

9 hours ago, diesieben07 said:

Danger, Leomelonseeds is a L33tHaXX0r.

Lol

[Draco18s 2392]

Another problem:

The last line of this post doesn't text-wrap and I have no idea why.

[Bektor 13]

 

@Mr. Flamegoat  HTTPS would be nice. Firefox always warns me about missing HTTPS on this site.  

Well, Chrome and Vivaldi also do, just not on the login field.

 

The next thing: Inserting an image from URL seems not to work well in Vivaldi (version 1.8, so the latest).

I mean, you click on the "Insert to post" button and nothing happens or it just takes that long that I assume nothing happens.

Not quite sure, but as everyone can see, worked the third time. ^^ Some progress bar or loading bar stuff would be nice there,

so if it takes somehow longer you can see that the website is doing something.

[Busti 72]

Is there a way to simply write inline code in replys? Currently I change the font like this but it is not very pleasant.
Markup uses the ` char but that obviously would not work here.

Edited September 5, 2017 by Busti
Too many ` chars. Stupid deadkeys.

[Draco18s 2392]

On 9/5/2017 at 5:08 PM, Busti said:

Is there a way to simply write inline code in replys? Currently I change the font like this but it is not very pleasant.
Markup uses the ` char but that obviously would not work here.

 

[Cadiboo 365]

On 3/9/2017 at 7:14 AM, Draco18s said:

Another problem:

The last line of this post doesn't text-wrap and I have no idea why.

Sorry for the necro, but this line still doesn't wrap

Edited November 14, 2018 by Cadiboo

[PaleoCrafter 1]

18 hours ago, Cadiboo said:

Sorry for the necro, but this line still doesn't wrap

I took a look at the markup generated for your post and it apparently has completely bogus inline styles applied to it (e.g. a fixed width which causes the line not to wrap and flow out of the container). I honestly can't reproduce this in a post of my own, so you must have hit a magic combination in the editor to achieve this. Trying to edit your post (for testing purposes) showed that removing the formatting (The editor button next to the 'Size' dropdown) from that line fixes the issue.

 

Unfortunately, there isn't much we can do to fix the cause of this, as, alas, WYSIWYG editors work in mysterious ways.

[Cadiboo 365]

5 hours ago, PaleoCrafter said:

I honestly can't reproduce this in a post of my own, so you must have hit a magic combination in the editor to achieve this. Trying to edit your post (for testing purposes) showed that removing the formatting (The editor button next to the 'Size' dropdown) from that line fixes the issue.

 

Unfortunately, there isn't much we can do to fix the cause of this, as, alas, WYSIWYG editors work in mysterious ways.

That makes sense. Its still possible to recreate this by editing the HTML markup while editing I think. I think that you shouldn't try to remove this because letting users customise their comments with markup is pretty cool.

Apparently all you need to do is set the width style and the table-layout style to fixed.

Edited November 15, 2018 by Cadiboo

[DiamondMiner88 2]

Sorry for resurrecting an old post but if you turn on dark mode,

On 11/15/2018 at 3:54 AM, Cadiboo said:

That makes sense. Its still possible to recreate this by editing the HTML markup while editing I think. I think that you shouldn't try to remove this because letting users customise their comments with markup is pretty cool.

This is how that sentence looks:

[Draco18s 2392]

What's up with spoiler blocks lately? They have massive, massive blank sections in them when expanded now:

<div style="height:1411px;width:3548px;">
						&nbsp;
					</div>

Test:

Spoiler

Sample test.

Includes a clode block {

}

 

Ok, its definitely not all of them, but some people that are doing something odd.

 

Here's a post with two such "broken" spoilers:

 

Edited September 27, 2019 by Draco18s

[DaemonUmbra 518]

It's from people copy-pasting rich text

[Draco18s 2392]

1 minute ago, DaemonUmbra said:

It's from people copy-pasting rich text

That would do it. Combined with people going "meh" when their own post looks like garbage.